Just lurkin. Is there a way to know if we have a legit baker vs a shill? Been here over 2 years now and can get a general feel, but sometimes it's hard to tell.
Perhaps. Not entirely sure I want to take on that kind of responsibility at the moment.
I would have to agree with this. I don't think bakers should be censors. I would think the job would be to make note of the notables as much as possible and let anons decide for themselves if it is worth pursuing or whatever. Each baker is his own guide kind of thing.
A few times I've made posts that exposed the shills because I would say something that torques their manbuns and then I watch to see who replys.
Just sheer volume and people wanting info etc. I guess it would sort of depend on how crippled the cabal is at that point. If normies start swarming here for info, and the black hats still have some resources, they are probably going to attack even harder with what they have. I know we've survived quite a few already but I would imagine that they would target the source of information because that is what they fear most. It's why they try to control it.
Nite.
Well I be gone. Nite bakers and baker wannabes. God bless us everyone.