/comfy/

I'll be around for discussion and let the teacher do some preaching/teaching.

>>9836

Honestly, that was a thing even before I started baking in 2018. Almost every baker had one when I started baking, and the BO/BVs suggested I get one.

Not sure, maybe another baker could correct me if I'm wrong, but it started before /qresearch/ on the other 8chan boards.

>>9863

So did I at first, went back to baking anonymously after the baker purge.

>>9865

You do not need a pastebin account, free nor pro, to bake.

Some just like it, others don't.

But exactly I wasn't paying close attention to Q related boards back in late 2017 and before /qresearch/ due to IRL, but I knew it started before /qresearch/.

>>9876

>just my way, not better or worse

Exactly.

>>9878

>>9883

>mitigating bad bakes

This usually happens during ebakes.

A "bad" bake I guess would be if it doesn't have notables from the last bread, isn't in the dough format (spacing, text edits, etc), or if it's a legitimate shill like freddy baking or something like that.

You just post a link to the fresher bread than report it to be locked.

>>9893

The board has just been laggy overall. I don't think it's due to a specific browser.

I have noticed though at night it's much better than during the day.

Big props to the day bakers who have been pushing through the lag and glitches like champs.

>>9898

>dealing with shitty unresponsive bakers is another class unto itself

When I bake I try to be as responsive as possible, without sliding the bread which would be unproductive.

>>9900

True kek.

>>9894

I didn't ask the question, that was 8809aa

>>9908

Ebakes are crazy and chaotic.

I used to be prepped for an ebake all the time but now it's mostly late due to lag so I'm less prepared.

I've noticed you cant find the new bread in the catalog for like at least minute now. Before this lag you could refresh the catalog like 10 seconds after it reached 100% and it'd be there.

>>9919

It was so comfy though for like a month or two before the current chinese virus. Now everyone is home all the time during the day, kek.

>>9999

>>10070

I've stopped doing that personally.

The breads are so fast now it's not really worth posting "baking" after posting the final notable bun for the dough.

You lose time by doing that instead of just baking.

Since the seminar is in session, I thought I'd expose how this shill (and his allies) have been attacking bakers for the past week or so:

>>>/qresearch/8740281

This is the same "bakers union" shill who has been attacking bakers with 3 or 4 others. He keeps posting this which happened today.

He is claiming without evidence, that the twitter user (who we all know from crumbs) IET, @inevitable_et , is a baker.

Then because a random anon said "The Doc is brilliant" about a thread by the same twitter user, that must mean IET is Doc the baker.

It's nonsensical and ridiculous, but shills will shill.

>>10106

> last call crew

I love when anons nominate something or want a notable revision at 700 posts after I already baked.

Legitimately nothing I can do.

>>10127

It's so pathetic to see.

It seems like the same attack the BVs were doing before they were fired, and now that they've been fired they're doing it again.

The point for posting that is to IGNORE SHILLS WHEN BAKING.

You'll slide the bread and give them even more ammo they can spread as disinfo if you engage.

Even though it's tempting, kek.

>>10142

I use wearethene.ws for that personally.

>>10137

You report it.

Using the little triangle at the top left of a post.

>>10133

All great tips.

>running list of general and specific bread titles

I usually just take quotes I like from Q and make sure another bread didn't use it by searching it in the catalog. I'm not that creative unless there's a happening going on, kek.

>>10162

>so how many practice before you try baking?

Honestly as many as it takes for you to be comfortable. No real set number.

> night shift better to try 1st time

No doubt.

>>10208

>>10212

Rusty you should unpin the others.

Also was doing a dig in general and missed a bunch of stuff going to read it now.

>>10224

Ah yea you're right. Thought for a sec there were 3 old ones in the catalog. There was just two and there's only one still pinned.

Just thought of that because the anon said he was in the other one.

So bakers, how would you answer this?

>>>/qresearch/8741637

>Why do we collect Notables?

>>10237

>>10236

I replied:

>Notables are collected for a few reason. It's a good way for anons to catch up on what was missed, they're organized so they can be spread from here easily, and they note articles, digs, graphics, and other important posts that might help an anon in their dig, graphic, and other important original content.

It's basically what I say everytime, but it's slightly different each time. I think we discussed this last week or maybe it was somewhere else.

>>10240

That's why I've always loved the idea for a notables aggregator which in my personal opinion wearethene.ws does very well.

I read notables as a part of my morning reading.

>>10242

That's the philosophical, metaphysical answer.

>>10246

Yea that's good too. There's really no wrong answer of course.

Just saw it in the bread and thought it'd be nice to post here too.

>>10251

Thanks bakers, great seminar.

>>10337

>>>/projectdcomms/### ————————––- X (Cap: >>#######)

>>####### ———————––––––––––––––– X (Cap: >>#######)

>>####### rt >>####### ————————— X (Cap: >>#######)

>>>/projectdcomms/### ————————––– X (Cap: >>#######)

>>####### ———————––––––––––––––– X (Cap: >>#######)

>>####### rt >>####### ————————— X (Cap: >>#######)

>>10342

^^^^^ used this to update the template pastebin in the dough:

https://pastebin.com/36a1EXpR