wonder what the teacher's gonna look like this year..
Bad bakes:
baking during imagehost problems
baking during extreme lag conditions.
fixing mistakes post-bake
shitty bakes are something idfferent, this anon is keeping the scope to how a legit baker can keep it rolling.
dealing with shitty unresponsive bakers is another class unto itself ;)
>regular anons know bakers start a lot earlier than with 8chan.
this what I'm looking for.. How much earlier are you baking on average? like 100 posts?
How different is baking on kun than chan under nominal net conditions? speedwise?
I've been hesitant because traffic has been so bad, at least from this area. sometimes 3+ minutes between refreshes.. a bred can end and go to hell in 3 minutes.
damn ok, so the conditions are what they are and this location isn't any better or worse than yours. thanks.
>baker's union
there was plenty of evidence of this in /cbts/
but that was then and now is why this is done openly ;)
AFLB was part of that club. That's why when AFLB got banned from the mod team, and then subsequently from baking, the reference from BO at that time was couched in terms of being given a second chance and failing at it.
They actually got 3 chances.
Because the suspicion was already there from the cbts days.
iirc. someone will apply the rod of correction if this anon is mistaken.
<AFLB
I'm sorry teach, should have been clear that this part was this anon's opinion:
>They actually got 3 chances.
>Because the suspicion was already there from the cbts days.
Because AFLB's antics were never accepted by this anon as being organic. gut feel: Do larpers try to represent one side only, or both sides, to appear more organic?
…
But yeah, as far as the whole bakers union thing, it did not last long, but then again neither did cbts…. nor did the storm. So the bakers union was correctly declined and shit upon by anons, but remembered, mabye even gained legend status, now.
As a matter of fact, in the beginning it was assumed that no board would last longer than a couple months. By everyone, including Q.
This anon is impressed that /qresearch/ has held it together. Impressed in a good way :D
>kappy
>I mean organic like flesh
indeed, not fake. wasn't kappy the youtuber that an heroed into a truck off an overpass?
wasn't he organic at first, too?
then he went inorganic.
then he did the flop.
AFLB got lucky in that respect.
The post body is exactly 5000 characters in /qr/. Anon learned this while posting things the shills would actively try to change, in /qr/.
So anon constructed their essay to fit inside of a post with exactly 5000 characters, to make it difficult for shills to modify and repost without changing verbiage in obvious ways.
>re: your linked post
> …
>Nothing will put actual shills to rest.
No. some things may even incite the shills.
There is a dedicated thread already, in the /qr/ catalog, that BO specifically made for notable post rendition, especially in cases where a baker would not include something in their bake.
That was a lungful. if spoken. wew.
The shills refuse to use it. last use is November of last year, the last this anon checked. Ergo, fuck the shills. This anon cannot support appeasement like that. Reagan would never do it.
…
Giving the bakers more to think about past #3 and #4 in >>10437,'s retort is solely at ''each individual baker's discretion''. Trying to enforce ethics codes or anything else for that matter would absolutely be a wedge issue for shills, as it would be pivoted into: a group of folks (this one posting in this thread, actually) is trying to enforce "standards". And Bob's your uncle and there's muh proof of a baker's union.
Stupid? yup. Will they do it? yup. is it not stupid? they will try it. Why does this anon say that?
Because # and #4 is really is all that is required of a "basic" baker. Everything else must come down to individual ethics as a baker. It sucks because nothing agreed to by anyone here can be forced on anyone in /qr/. No matter how good the ideas are.
''It can only be demonstrated in personal efforts by bakes who lead by example.''
>Seems like its ethos rewards the strong and mocks the weak.
In this anons opinion, bakers are merely a subset of anons, themselves; thus there is no reconciliation necessary.
The grouping of individuals into "anons" and "bakers" in your post is something a divisive individual would do.
Not sure what your intent is with that line of questioning, but it's been duly noted.
>Not sure what your intent is with that line of questioning, but it's been duly noted.
That looks harsher than it was meant. let's rephrase..
anon is just trying to call attention to the pitfalls of quantizing things that shouldn't be quantized, is all. Anons are anon because identity politics is a killer. and WW1WGA is for bakers, too.
Shadilay!
>Only if i happen to identify the role i play as "ME."
It will happen to any individual that gets arrogant enough to believe that being a baker makes one somehow different than, or elevated from, any other anon. It undercuts the idea that "anyone can bake".
It's a faceted subject, to be sure… This post correctly assesses the retort given… → >>10453. Precautions are good.
>Some of us have had life experiences that tend to wipe out the illusion that one's job or role has much to do with one's identity
Yes, that's true. Even more so when you see it play out in others. Did a test about 5 years ago, when this anon was still working as a PC tech in a hospital: Asked 10 people "what are you?". THREE people told me they were either a person, or a human being. 1 said they were a potato (not kidding) and the remaining 6 responded with their current job title. Three people answered correctly, in this anon's opinion. PC repair is boring as fuck. The money is attractive though :)