I don't feel tardy
yes
the dough is made for /qresearch/
links go
from same board (/qresearch/) to same board (/qresearch/)
or from one board to another /comms/ to /qresearch/ or vise' versa
two for same board
three & board name for cross board links
>>10021 same board
>>>/qresearch/8739537 from here to /qresearch/
if you went there and wanted to link those posts...
>>8739537
oh ya
goes waaaaay back
this board was started because AFLB banned me for 3 days mid bake, for no good reason
>golden rule violation
KEK
from the dungheap roses grow
but ya, there's a bit of history with at least one subversive group that has infiltrated the board to near it's highest levels, it's why Q switched from 4 to 8 and then from cbts to qresearch
def gonna have to scrape all these class threads for history
my memory is only so~so
it helps to have many viewpoints
>Because AFLB's antics were never accepted by this anon as being organic.
seemed like an organic slide into mental illness to me at the time and in retrospect, but AFLB did not act alone
I do think there was spoopiness involved and perhaps outright fuckery in that group AFLB was associated with
had a few BVs here before the switch to 8Kun
no real duties, I figured it was good for bakers to see this side of the board
what a BO can and cannot do
I haven't seen any of 'em log in
the login stayed the same
>i figured why not try…
that's why I made this place and Teach started these classes
nothing ventured, nothing gained
>>10222 (cheKEKed)
>but those baker checks weren't training wheels.
ah… but they were
somehow we've managed to wobble along without that "authority" figure
FJ does the scut work
deletes superfluous threads, renumbers the occasional misnumberd bread, answers the reports etc…
what more does the BO really need to do?
it seems the consensus in re: dough revision history
was to add it to the end of the dough as a page #5 that doesn't get posted in the bread
this way the revision history travels with the dough
I'd suggest standard formatting with the newest revision on top
04/09/2020 ~ changed out link for TOR posting URL to plain URL
04/06/2020 - removed link to ancient notables archive at /comms/
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
00/00/2017 dough is born
bread number is implied in the notables list
(last notables + 1 = current bread number)
but both would not be out of line
archives of Baking seminars (all taken 04/10/2020)
#1 Feb 13, 2020 http://archive.md/0VAOg
#2 Feb 20, 2020 http://archive.md/R2nwc
#3 Feb 27, 2020 http://archive.md/z8S3G
#4 Mar 05, 2020 http://archive.md/Sjk7s
#5 Mar 12, 2020 http://archive.md/r4yzo
#6 Mar 19, 2020 http://archive.md/Vg4SO
#7 Mar 26, 2020 http://archive.md/hjrU0
#8 Apr 02, 2020 http://archive.md/Shd6v
> needs to learn how to listen to those who are trying to help him. As do all new bakers.
this part is really rough
who do you trust?
on an anonymous underwater basket weaving forum, just who do you trust
the kind voice?
the major thing I've learned is to care about content instead of container
taking advice and correction is something hard for some people and when the voice trying to advise them isn't familiar or seems similar to an attacker / shill…
it's a good thing baking mistakes aren't deadly, if they were I've racked up enough to wipe out a regiment
One thing about mistakes… you always learn something you didn't know before
do not stop the classes!
the weekly meeting is good for the community
good for new bakers
good for wannabe bakers
bakers do need some sort group meet from time to time
keep it all open to all
but give extra attention to those new bakers who are still learning
be good to each other
bake on!
>CtrlF.
kek, thanks
my Ctrl -Fu is stronk
much can be done with that simple tool
for instance
an example
if you wanted to know aproximately how fast the bread is moving you can
do a series of Ctrl-Fs (lets pretend the bread started at 14:51
15:0 - will give me how many posts between 15:00 & 15:09
15:1 - how many posts between 15:10 & 15:19
15:2
etc…
each will give you the number of posts per 10 minute period
I used the 15:0 as an example starting point but in practice you would use the time of your current bread
>mentoring new bakers
I agree, shift preference would be a starting point to pair newbies with established bakers
>always to admit your mistakes right away.
an error doesn't become a mistake until you fail to admit it
I cannot state strongly enough
WHEN you screw up, fess up quick and fix it
Do NOT be ashamed of making mistakes, the only one's who never make a mistake never do anything worthwhile
You'll notice I said when not IF
no shame in it
it means you tried
keep making the same mistake over and over…
well, that's a subject for a different discussion
>But one thing is clear. Even if there is nothing going on of a nefarious nature (assuming this is true), being overly 'playful', 'in-groupy' or mysterious creates opps for shills to make trouble. Or makes bakers looks like shills themselves. Or bakers to wonder about other bakers. None of which is helpful.
keeping a group paranoid and suspecting each other is a well known tactic
and I'm with you, I find very little is funny about those activities
I have long tried to get all the bakers to chat here, to help with building community and keep it all in the open where all can read it
>I have a problem of thinking everyone is a shill and trusting basically no one but Q
don't trust anything you hear
only trust half of what you see
heck, there's times I don't even trust myself…
(joke)
it's OK, I'm used to it, and BTW, don't change, stay suspicious, there is good reason to be, this is a war
>we're actually all anon coz "gyb" ain't on muh birth certificate.
ya, my mother din't name me Rusty either, a "pen name" I chose due the the cartoon character's paranoia about the governement
not a single person in my life knows, my son just thinks I"m a regular /pol/ ack ( if such people can be called 'regular')
THAT error is when many people are trying to post new threads, it's a lock to prevent sliding of the board by flooding it with spam threads
as far as I know it is NOT per poster it is aggregate meaning it is a perfect way to screw with bakers, it is a 'rolling 60 minute window' with a max limit counter
by posting many new threads just prior to baking time the limit can be reached and no new bread can be baked
it is what happened to you
I'm not sure what the exact parameters are on /qresearch/
I remember discussion about this feature at the beginning of /qresearch/
this discussion has caused me to look at the board owners settings page
>pic related
this is a list of the parameters the BO can set for his board
this shows the current settings here at /comms/
you will find near the very bottom
Maximum number of threads per hour boardwide
here at /comms/ it's set to 20 per hour
I've never needed to mess with it
forgotten all about it til now
>20 threads posted an hour on /comms/
never seen that much activity here on /comms/
but that isn't the question is it
the question is what happened to the baker on /qresearch/ the other night
here is the /qresearch/ board log
if you look you'll see FJ deleted many threads
because the board was being flooded with spam threads
this would cause the problem
not so sure on title
may stir up some shit
not truly expressive of the actions taken
what you have "BTFO" isn't the baker's union but a group of divisionfags and shills that may or may not have anything to do with that original ancient group from over 2 years ago
I think this post
>>>/qresearch/8781857 How To Police To Ensure No Baker Censorship
in bread #11243 was an excellent move by OSS1
nothing we do will satisfy shills
but, posts such as >>>/qresearch/8781857
when a baker puts something like that in the notables it shows that the baker is listening to the complaints
it shows the baker understands the concern and is offering a way to compromise and try to satisfy all anons
when shills ignore it and continue to shill
it makes it obvious that the shills have no intention of actually contributing anything worth while
and if anons do use that format and a baker ignores it...
evidence will pile up that will help bakers to do a better job
>It can only be demonstrated in personal efforts by bakes who lead by example.
very, very true
leading by example
send an e-mail to
RustyBShackelfordJr@protonmail.ch
please do NOT use a personal e-mail
OPSEC
I do not want to know who you are
not sure how much experience you'll get here as BV of /comms/ but I'll help however I can
you don't want to see an "us vs. them" type dynamic evolve out of this…
neither do I
and neither does
a good topic for BAKER discussion
How much does chan culture influence bakers' attitudes towards anons?
there's not much that happens on /comms/ that needs the attention of a BO or BV
pinning (sticky) and unpinning the class thread is about the most action I've seen in a while
and I'm not sure 8kun is going to be the same as endchan in regards the moderator's control panel etc…
most curious
it seems that page has had a few things scrubbed from it
good thing I got an archive shot
http://archive.md/UGCXR
look for post
No.16910985
or ID
dc12be
KEK
ever try 'mountain oysters'?
you get my point, some people cannot handle the ugly facts
IMHO as long as Q posts there and the spam threads are cleared from the catalog all is good.
the intrigue and bullshit are just distractions