>>303026

That's the worst thing he could have done. Oh well.

>black dick captcha

>>303078

It's an articulation tactic. Makes people pay more attention to what he's saying.

>>303083

Yeah, the boomer havent noticed that he's on YOUTUBE and not talking to someone in a party.

It does work face to face, but i do agree that it's silly in this medium.

Vee on the other hand is just repulsive. He takes the boomer's tryhardness to the other extreme.

>>303094

That would be fun, however, i think that this will also backfire on him, and he might not even win the lawsuit.

>>303103

I don't get it. I was always the class sperg, but when i did well on the quizes, people liked me more. Might be a boomer thing.

>>303105

>he HAS to prove that it costed him financial damage

Holy shit, this retard has no idea how modern law works. He hasn't even heard of hedonic damage? It's literally the biggest topic on Law in the last 20-30 years.

I think that we can say for sure that he was lying when he said that he has a law degree, kek.

>>303112

Depending on the subject he's going to prosecute whoever it is in, it might not be defamation, but hedonic damages due to the fact that they exposed his personal informations to a large quantity of people with the intention of causing personal damage.

In the case of defamation, he could also easily make a case that, let's say, Sargon calling him a conman to over 200k people damages his image to a considerable part of society, something that could possibly affect his livelyhood, considering that he is a capitalist and makes (or made) most of his money due to business deals that might not be possible anymore. Although i havent looked into romanian law, i'm confident that any case of defamation in which it could actively affect the subject's financial conditions would be covered by some normative device.

I'm a lawyer, you can trust me.

>>303123

Romania has revoked all criminal defamation laws? Kek, the madmen. I mean, morality i think it's the way to go, but people certainly bitch a lot about it.

Anyways, I haven't looked into the romanian civil code, nor it's jurisprudences so i don't actually know how this would work, i guess, but there usually is a legislation which guarantee bussinesses not to be slandered in a way which it would be financially damaging to the company, although i'll concede that i don't actually know about it, just have a strong conviction of it.

>>303128

Nah m8. I'm from a 2nd world shithole as well, and things DO work, when they don't, it's either because the judge was bribed or the other lawyer was much better than yours.

Anyways, all of this is simply speculation, as we all know CRP won't do shit to vee.