> place to openly discuss ideas without censorship.
None of that faggotry here so far. Not too thrilled about your ID though.
> place to openly discuss ideas without censorship.
None of that faggotry here so far. Not too thrilled about your ID though.
It was just a shitpost anon. Merry Christmas.
Try to show one of them some data like this now and all you get is that fluoride stare.
I you don't reserve all your rights at the beginning of your interaction with an agent representing a fictional entity, it will be assumed that you have none.
>If you don't
That's why they need to be taught. So the people could become competent again.
Where ever the people standโฆ
Ebot knew
>clarify his definition
Right, that's why it would help many to comprehend the complexity of this labyrinth we navigate.
Probably wouldn't be able to ask those questions in the "public domain"
If it was just you and GEOTUS in a room, the answers would be 'dasting for sure.
>tfw the "invisible enemy is actually a literal thing.
I'm more interested in the "10 days to unfold">>3584
Could swear I read certain things and see that they read one thing, and I look again and they read something else.
>WHAT other universe is it really necessary to not be allowed to answer truthfully, publicly?
I wasn't saying I agree with it anon, and you're absolutely right. The only reason I can see things being like this right now is unless everything is perfectly navigated in a very specific way, staying within some kind of boundary, a big red button will be pushed that results in an instant "Game Over." Other than that I have no idea, and hopefully time will tell.