Lich Lord of GamerGate ID: 083525 Oct. 7, 2017, 4:27 p.m. No.331203   🗄️.is 🔗kun

ACID, LOOK HERE PLZ

OK, posting here since we don't have a Meta thread.

In short, we've got someone (or multiple, different IDs yet he speaks like the same person) who won't give in the Timber thread:

>>331199

In short:

> Hey guys stop shitting up /jp/

< How dare you make them come to my board!

> I'm telling them to stop-

< How dare you make them come to my board!

> I can't control other people-

< How dare you make them come to my board!

Etc.

The persistence leads me to believe it's a troll- probably the same one who posted on /jp/ in the first place. The fact they beg for an apology for something we didn't do sounds very familiar.

 

In any case, we need mods to delete those posts, ban those anons, so the important posts (the 1, 2, 3, 4 summarizing what to do like >>331201 ) can be seen from the front of the board. Clear goals help those goals move forward.

 

I get the distinct feeling that even if no one replies to him, he'll reply just so his post is the first one seen on the board. "Oh god, GG is so bad! Isn't it bad? GG shouldn't be allowed on 8ch!"

Lich Lord of GamerGate ID: 083525 Oct. 7, 2017, 4:39 p.m. No.331204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>331141

There was info on UBM a few threads back- and probably in the depths of HQ.

I'd also argue (though this is a new OP), that since Journos opinions are now questioned, we go hard on bad devs. If we're taking out UBM for funding bad shit in vidya, why not purge the industry of the big suits who bankrolled lootboxes and the like.

DeepFreeze- for anti-consumer practices of Devs. Including but not limited to:

  • Gambling for digital goods with real money.

  • Cutting content for DLC.

  • Failing to meet tangible promises ("It's gonna be great" can't be quantified. "It has 10 levels" can.)

  • Review Embargos

  • Price & stock manipulation

  • Encouraging specific ideologies within their companies or audience.

  • Replacing a skilled & demanding audience with a casual and less demanding one. Or simply "dumbing down what the audience desires & expects."

  • Failing to defend freedom of artistic expression. This does not include refusing to do something; anyone can refuse to do anything. This does include canning something already in production due to outcry from someone who is not their target audience.

  • Attempts to avoid competing with Japanese devs via indirect sabotage. I.e. poor localization, encouraging hatred towards content often found in their games, making finding decent translation harder along with inflating import costs, etc.

  • Clear evidence of cutting quality for quantity, shorter dev time, or simply having the promised budget vanish into ~~someone's pocket~~ thin air.

  • Disdain for "nerds & geeks".

  • General jewery.

 

In terms of priority, Google -UBM -> Bad Devs -> Journos (IMO).

Many things fall under those umbrellas.

Net censorship and Youtube's adpocalypse fall under Google (maybe even all net stuff like Twitter). Timber and localization would fall under Bad Devs, etc.