Jytdog attacks SlimVirgin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Charlie_Gard_case
Some time ago Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail. SlimVirgin ignored that decision and cited the Daily Mail on the Charlie Gard article. When Jytdog told her that was not allowed, she accused Jytdog of working for a PR firm. Jytdog also accuses her of biased editing.
> Since her first edits at the page, SlimVirgin has trying to create a frame and try to force things into it.
SlimVirgin uses tl;dr as a defense, canvasses another user, and demands to be removed from the complaint against her.
> I'm going to let the length of the above speak for itself. Pinging Coretheapple. I'd appreciate if it someone would remove my name from the heading. SarahSV (talk) 07:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Two of Wikipedia's most politically powerful editors are at ANI. Let's see who takes sides.
Johnuniq ignores the complaint and condemns Jytdog's past behavior in other cases.
Ealdgyth calls this "a classic case of bringing a content dispute to ANI."
Coretheapple, Jusdafax, DynaGirl, and MontanaBW call for a boomerang against Jytdog.
Only Kingofaces43 supports Jytdog's position.
Masem tries to be neutral and suggests that maybe it might have been troutworthy for SlimVirgin to continue accusing Jytdog of being a paid PR operative after he denied it.
Power~enwiki says there is nothing sanction worthy here.
Kingsindian describes the diffs as "mistakes"
An IP with a grudge, 49.195.121.88, attacks Jytdog for his past behavior.
IP 121.216.192.249 accused Jytdog of hating women. Beyond My Ken feels forced to out Jytdog as a woman because that matters more to Wikipedia than whether rules are being violated, so Jytdog is forced to out himself as male to correct the record.
JudeccaXIII put himself on a fast track to being banned:
> I just need to express a few of my concerns. Let's start with SlimVirgin's username being removed from the title of this discussion. This is ANI, I've seen usernames about editors, IPs, and admins in the title of a discussion here. Even now, some of these ANI reports have usernames in the titles of a discussion. But no editor is willing to remove the names accociated with the discussion. Yet, for some reason, there was an exception for this case because of a request. My point is, no one should be getting special treatment at ANI nor hide from an ANI report about them. My other concern is SlimVirgin's first response. She didn't bother to argue with the report, instead, she pings editor Coretheapple. Then she decides to ping editor Whizz40 for what? To me, this is inappropriate WP:CANVASS. And who in the hell are these IPs? They ain't new editors asking for advice. I can understand Jytdogs's frustrations. His/Her behavior is obviously not appropriate, but neither is SlimVirgin's. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 08:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)