that 3rd URL about the "activist label" is a pretty good point. How come Zoe Quinn isn't categorized as an activist?
Aside from her "about" page, there was 3 references posted supporting that which I found posted on the banned talk after some digging.
Posted them on a new thread >>330590 since it would be nice to have an issues-based positive discussion about Zoe.
Her standing up for depressed people and sex workers is great, and I hope the positive feedback and attention from the UN she gets helps create more support systems for depressed people and sex workers.
I'm not sure why Wikipedia is censoring that she is an activist helping the depressed / sex workers; it is no secret and she declares this openly and it's notable enough to get media coverage.
It's almost like editors there are white-knighting to protect her from her own words even though they've been out there for years and she's never taken them back, and used her past as a depressed person and a sex worker towards the positive aim of helping depressed people and sex workers who are suffering from persecution and being shunned by society.
I think the reason for Wikipedia's censorship of these facts is pretty clear: they don't want people to know about the sex work because they think it will tarnish her image.
That is a very sex-negative viewpoint which I think is slut-shaming by Wikipedia. I have a sex-positive viewpoint and I admire her work in this and how it has helped her grow as a person.
Just like her depression, I don't think it takes away from her, but it actually adds to her, especially since she used both these 2 aspects of herself as a bridge to help others.