Drama in NPOVN Archive 67. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_67
-
NPalgan2 asks if the article on Steve Bannon should have a pic of a protester calling him racist, what with BLP and all. TheValeyard says:
> The connections of Steve Bannon to white nationalist causes is a widely-held point of view, supported by countless reliable sources.
-
Sangdeboeuf is scrubbing the Linda Sarsour page of mentions that people other than the alt-right have protested against her. NorthBySouthBaranof backs him up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Linda_Sarsour#CUNY_speech_controversy
ZinedineZidane98 protested, Nableezy went to his talk page to accuse him of sockpuppetry.
Sangdeboeuf also edit-warred to remove references to the Washington Times, TheBlaze, and Chris Wallace from the page Patriot Prayer. Jorm and K.e.coffman joined in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patriot_Prayer&diff=800353082&oldid=800349891
-
Terrorist96, citing the SPLC, says that black supremacy is racist and so the article should have the template for Racism topics. Wikipedians disagree with this! Malik Shabazz and Grayfell removed the template. Fyddlestix and Pincrete say they can't call it racist without a reliable source and the SPLC doesn't count. Objective3000 concurs with the "no RS" group and lectures someone against saying "call a spade a spade." TheValeyard accused Terrorist96 of "skirting the line of a racist statement" for saying "Black separatists are black supremacists by definition." The Four Deuces adds: "The SPLC article does not say black supremacism is racist."
Carwil cites professor Eduardo Bonilla-Silva to define racism as "prejudice plus power" and not as its actual definition of discriminating against people and considering some better than others on account of their race. The Blade of the Northern Lights objects to this, and NorthBySouthBaranof and EvergreenFir jump in to defend Carwil.