Battlespace Analysis
https://image.ibb.co/cOpPcy/01_of_12_Battlefield_Analysis.png
This is a high-level overview of the infrastructure, personnel, and operational behavior of the efforts being deployed to suppress, disrupt, distract, and infiltrate /pol/
The purpose of this analysis is to compromise the efficiency of neural networks and bots while forcing your adversaries to rely entirely on memetically-susceptible humans.
Weaknesses in the Personnel
https://image.ibb.co/h2DHxy/02_of_12_Weaknesses_in_the_Personnel.png
Technical staff can be any combination of private sector contractors and multi-national military personnel. Here's how to look for and exploit their personal signatures:
> Budget constraints determines how many questions they ask on StackOverflow, HackerNews, and Twitter.
< GitHub repositories with machine learning and data science projects provide a list of candidates worth cross checking against.
> LinkedIn profiles with machine learning and data science experience provide a list of candidates worth cross checking against.
< Posing as employers looking to hire data scientists and machine learning can help expose the technical staff as well.
> Looking into bot programming funded by the European Investment Fund can help narrow down those engaging in this behavior.
< Data scientists and data engineers are the most expensive personnel costs, so utilizing any techniques that drives up their operational costs are essential.
> Paid disruptors are the cheapest, but they also have the most cognitively dynamic tasks and are the most prone to psychological compromise.
< The more educated the personnel, the more they believe they are on the “right side of history”. This means the more you make bots behave “incorrectly” (Tay), the more they will justify throwing money into bad AI development techniques and goals.
Weaknesses in the Pipeline
https://image.ibb.co/k0Tjcy/03_of_12_Weaknesses_in_the_Pipeline.png
Machine learning pipelines are complex operations. Each step of the pipeline is susceptible to increasing operational costs to its subsequent steps. This makes psychological and steganographic attacks very profitable.
Categorization means a human reads your response and validates its emotional, contextual, and semantic category. They can categorize an entire post or specific sentences within a post. Categorization is automated at this point, so the more you can force disruptors to be manually involved in the categorization process, the more you drive up their costs to the entire pipeline.
A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale. Think of it like a gigantic book: while it many have nearly every possible combination of words written within it, connecting all that data to actionable knowledge is difficult and expensive. Humans are very good at innuendo, and innuendo the steganography of context. Strategies of steganography can very quickly outpace even the very best of Moore's Law.
Supervised training means teaching the bot how to generate messages based on categorizations and context awareness. Often, when the community labels a post as a “shill”, that helps narrow down what content the bot should be trying to mimic to maximize disruption.
The bot interfaces with the community GUI/API and posts content based on how it determines the contextual and emotional sentiment of the thread or any subsection of a thread. If possible, board owners should find ways to mess around with CSS to try and randomize the underlying HTML structure of a page per page load.
Overview of Natural Language Processing
https://image.ibb.co/ebCAHy/04_of_12_Overview_of_Natural_Language_Processing.png
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is the premiere collection of tools to extract context from symbols and semantic rules. Natural Language Processing biased towards the cheap and widespread availability of human-made corpora.
Challenge/Response Verification
https://image.ibb.co/jPCo4d/05_of_12_Challenge_Respones_Verification.png
As anonymous posters, it's important to confirm you are engaging with people and not bots. Using a simple CHALLENGE/RESPONSE system during conversation within your posts can help acquire confirmation of sentience.
In the pic related are just three examples of the CHALLENGE/RESPONSE system. Feel free to add to this list.
The key to being effective is to make sure that they require a demonstration of either context awareness, which only the most expensive neural networks can do correctly OR to evaluate non-language grammar. Math is the most readily available example of non-language grammar, but there are other examples as well.
The bigger this list gets, the more exceptions a pipeline has to compensate for, the more expensive it is.
Context-Aware Steganography
https://image.ibb.co/n1qxxy/06_of_12_Context_Aware_Steganography.png
This technique requires the most discipline, but it is also the Holy Grail of Gnostic Warfare. It renders any AI pipeline into an expensive paranoid schizophrenic seeing threats everywhere while missing the forest from the trees.
This whole section starts on Page 20 of https://libgen.pw/download/book/5a1f047d3a044650f5fd694f
The Lazy Prisoner and Narrow-Minded Warden
https://image.ibb.co/f6YT4d/07_of_12_The_Lazy_Prisoner_and_the_Narrow_Minded_Warden.png
To survive, you have to appear like a lazy prisoner to a panopticon warden that may see all, but can only understand a small amount of it.
Expensive Steganalytic Attacks
https://preview.ibb.co/hTmgPd/08_of_12_Expensive_Steganalytic_Attacks.png
CAPTCHAs are an example of context-aware steganography: They are neurologically easy but computationally difficult. Using a variation of this, there is a way to massively drive up the cost of an bot operation.
Transmutation Entropy of Epistemology
https://image.ibb.co/fYnXVJ/09_of_12_Transmutation_Entropy_of_Epistemology.png
Here's a diagram that explains the transmutation entropy of epistemology. Knowledge, information, and data are the output of the crypto, stego, and neuro systems. The work these systems do are representation, encryption, decryption, and interpretation. The transmutation waste is represented as cryptanalysis and steganalysis.
Context Switches as Bits
https://image.ibb.co/eAEqHy/10_of_12_Context_Switching_As_Bits.png
Context-aware steganography exploits context switching as a way to encode hidden information into semantically correct sentences.
Incorrect Synonyms
https://image.ibb.co/ctt6qJ/11_of_12_Incorrect_Synonyms.png
In this example, an incorrect synonym with an agreed upon encode transmits hidden information. To uncover the information, the observer would first have to detect the word-sense disambiguation, which is an expensive task for artificial intelligence.
The Power of the Stego CHALLENGE/RESPONSE
https://image.ibb.co/igxMPd/12_of_12_The_Power_of_the_Stego_Challenge_Response.png
This gives us an example of a very powerful tool that heavily negates even the most expensive deep learning techniques and forces adversaries to perpetually deploy expensive human disruptors. During deployments, they can be exposed to our memetic and psychological warfare attacks.
I highly recommend the stego CHALLENGE/RESPONSE for maximum effect. It is easy for humans to resolve and requires more resources that Moore's Law can ever muster to solve reliably.
You're all going to make mistakes using this technique, but you will get better at it with practice. The CHALLENGE/RESPONSE system is much better than accusing a post of being a “shill” as it forces them to prove they are human.
> They can simply self correct and adjust to anything you might do. he system is impervious because the system self corrects as soon as disruptions are made.
Which means I control their evolution.
> Not to mention the whole new emotion Bullshittery isn't even possible.
And yet, you have emotions. How were they created? Or were you just born with emotions divined into your skull by magical forces?
> The only thing that can help is massive exterminations. Death on an industrial scale.
I would recommend not subscribing to the prophecies of James Cameron or the ridiculous assumptions made by those infected with the Progressive Cathedral's version of original sin.
Nuclear annihilation concern me more than you can ever know. The Boomers sat around and got high because they couldn't envision a way out of the madness. I have proposed a different track entirely.
I will talk about Maj. Gen. Weinstein at a later date when the moment is just right.
> You don't control their evolution
This is an insufficient rebuttal that doesn't actually address any points made at all.
> The moment is right; the moment is RIGHT NOW!
I operate on my time table, not on the time table of a person who has confused this board to be an open source therapist instead of a place to discuss Gnostic Warfare.
Bad actor points awarded.
> If you delay any, you're just trying to find an angle.
If that wasn't entirely clear from the very moment I revealed the New Emotion problem months ago, then you hasn't done any homework at all. The angle is this: humanity endures by eliminating the possibility of being wiped out by a single global catastrophe.
thats_the_angle.jpg
It's been out there for months.
More bad actor points awarded.
> Use every weapon the instant it's picked up. Strike now.
You are an incompetent strategist.
Lots of more bad actor points, free of charge.
A warning: you are considered a bad actor on this board. The next time you post as a bad actor, I will edit all of your posts to make you appear to be an incredibly happy person who enjoys the vibrancy of life and, gosh darn it, wants to share it with the world.
I have never turned down criticism. I will not tolerate persistent and juvenile context-invariant nihilism that poorly hides your fear of being openly selfish.
Summary
> If you edit my posts to strip away all of my attempts to demoralize everyone who visits /gw/ and replace my terrible strategy with concise summaries of my critiques, YOU'RE ONLY PROVING YOU ARE THE WORST
Final bad actor points awarded for incorrect conflation of authority.
Your name from here on out is Kittens and Rainbows. I will enjoy reducing your posts to the essentials… and then I will address them with your demoralization attempts removed.
You're not martyr or a wedge issue. You're Kittens and Rainbows and you're the happiest guy here from now on.
I have to say, Kittens and Rainbows, your complete change of mood has been inspirational and you're asking some really valid questions. I'm looking forward to addressing them all over the week.
This is a good find. I'm a huge proponent of adversarial training due to its implied biomimicry.
> Refusing to process an adversarial example is better than misclassifying it, but not a satisfying solution.
I wonder what happens when this is paired with knockout training… could be exciting!
I am not.