My thinking is:
non-babyfisted Q posts made with TOR
Zero delta found, significantly unlikely to be accident. Follows standard pattern, first Q post, then RPOTUS.
Post with a standard ip ID unseen in thread before and new trip confirming message and thanking /hm/ BOs/patriots.
Only 3 is suspect without a direct delta from RPOTUS.
If it's someone jerking off OSS/8B or OSS himself, shrug. Message still aligns both with the zero delta of 1 and 2, so it doesn't matter.
If it's real Q, all the post did was give credit where credit was due and inform us of future comms based around standard delta confirming methods.
So, you know, discernment 'n shit.
so literally going thousand monkeys with typewriters strategy
desperation doesn't even begin to describe the flailing happening in that camp. Real anon would know when the larp is bust and it's time to switch identities. Fags, all of 'em.
>flood /qr/ with fake q
>claim board under attack
>means original babyfisted torq posts were legit
calling the narrative, go ahead Jim, make my sides burst once more
Noooo, stop anon, you're hurting their feelings!
>They were right. And ow their revolution is upon us.
You got that right, traitors. And this time you ain't hijacking it.
Undeniable and purposeful. Could not be repeated with spamming. Dan also did not post baby fist.
Q strictly meant any future comms if they are necessary. States so in the same post.
Delta was noticed here. No one on /qr/ noticed delta. Q waited for acknowledgement of delta to establish personal legitimacy.
Other points:
>improper vote format
perhaps there is a reason/meaning to it. Dig.
>uprecedented (you) screencap, Q has never posted a (you) before
why should he before, when he had a secure trip to establish id?
>unprecedented filename
are you completely sure of this?
>quoted a sentence of an article without providing the link
quotes without links have been used before, anons found source later on.
>said above article was worth remembering despite the fact that it was only published the morning of the fake Q post
he noted fresh articles at post time before
>no refutation
Dan babyfist
>no indication of future direction
do you expect a roadmap of happenings? When has that ever happened with Q?
>stringers were copy pasted
because they were relevant again, apparently?
>LB instead of (pb)
it's /pb actually.
Dan is confirmed to have been browsing QR and HM. Adopting culture happens.
All you have is conjecture and what-ifs. Tl;dr cry more.
I love how hung up they are on the 5/4 6-3 thing. "Oh no! One judge more than expected turned out to vote in agreement to the thing we wanted in the first place, meaning they're turning faster than expected, hoping to save their skin! THAT MEANS Q IS A LIAR!"
you seem frustrated