hello new frens

fake Q sent me here as well

2 seconds into reading those post I felt it was off

Q is very concise. The larp was too wordy. Anyways, good evening o7

>>22675

ty. just catching up and seeing how much effort I want to rededicate to things. Off the top of my head regarding the SC & EPA. There was an article from May where a Judge ruled the SEC's power given to them from Congress was essentially illegal. I will try and find a link to a non paywall article. Ring any bells to anyone?

>>22678

>https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-19/is-the-sec-unconstitutional

>>22679

I meant SC as in supreme court not south carolina but yes. Essentially agencies having power way beyond their initial intended scope

>>22684

appreciate it. I did see that post here, and also the non-trip Q posts in /qr, which to be honest made more sense since that non-trip was seconds before trump as a zero delta, and read more like a true Q post

>>22689

yeah when I read that it reminded me of an article from May >>22681 basically that these agencies have just been makes rules without oversight or congress approval, which seems like they can all be ruled unconstitutional

>>22839

seeing toots brings me back

gm frens

>>22848

>>22849

>SURPRISE WITNESS.

>Who was surprised?

>Who will be surprised?

reading through original Q posts, these 3 lines jump out and just do not seem right. Its simply a gut feeling from having read thousands of posts, over and over. Almonds small