I can confirm that personal details are dropped, but I can't confirm what without confirmation of doxxing details. I'm not the only one who has experienced this from others who has revealed the gaslight.
Imagine you were Frederick Brennan, and he moved in on you, walks away with your board because he's a miserable cunt of a boss and landlord, that you have to flee the country, and he walks away with your board and wants to cause you pain to the point where you break bones and possibly die, because of a grudge that you developed working UNDER him. Do you really think he gives a fuck about anyone's freedom when he simultaneously threatens extradition? Think a moment, Frederick told the truth, as the coder of a feature that either JW doesn't know about OR wants YOU to not know about it.
Jim is, going by marital timing alone. Fred is not, going by hosting wizard chan and Jim buying him hookers (to blackmail, maybe).
Or maybe he tracks IPs and on the IP net will build a dossier about persons of interest like a spy would? It's not hard to do if you've got a logged history, and admin a social engine. Superhuman powers? How many ad tracking companies are there that have started over the last two decades? SUPER human powers every one of them in that industry, huh?
Or gives information to those who have access to or is so lax at security that the servers have been rooted long ago which either or both. How often do you think he updates his servers given that he lets salts alone for so long? Purposely? Think he's a super smarty with patching security holes but hasn't a clue about salt rotation?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/technology/8chan-fredrick-brennan-libel.html
Q obviously did not trust Jim, because trustless design is secure. Thus zero-delta's existence as a ruleset.
People peddling mindless "trust Jim" aren't doing so for their own confirmation, they want you to put on a mind slug and stupidify.
That will happen no matter what gets capped. Don't act oppositely of what they do, or your playbook gets forecastable
>who screamed so loud they screamed on Q's board saying NU UH WE HAD THE BETTER NARRATIVE CHOOSE US PLX
ok faggot, listen here. First of all you're a namefag. Second, you rival the purpose of the board's stated purpose and just like Paul Furber you're fucking complaining and ignoring all Qproofs after you.
Just fucking face it, Scavino is hot stuff, and you're fucking not.
It strikes me that no matter which LARPER we choose, the only way to be absolutely certain is to hold all equally responsible and all equally guilty, in order to ensure that none escape judgement in trying to play the blame name game. It won't work this time. Resolute.
Because, we already see throwing under the bus, and we already he bad actors watching us, so it's a matter of game theory to assume they'll try to shadowbox us, misdirect us. But it doesn't matter because if we up front say it doesn't matter who says what. Babyfist, Steinbart, Defango, Trevor, RDS, Lestat, Thomas Schoenberger, Jim Watkins, Janon, James Kingsley, Dee, Christine Maxwell, Doge, bring out all of your cast, it doesn't matter, all of you are guilty of sin, and all of you would rather hide the truth and control a narrative.
Fed at the Hoover Dam, same deal lol
I demand the big tittied one.
This is one reason they can convince others to participate in they gamified goals LARPs. They twist things until they are the heros. E.g., they have a LARP that says they're revealing that BTC is broken, but the goal of that is .... "breaking BTC cryptography before you tell the world that yes indeed we knew it WAS broken see!!!??? WE knew you were hiding it from everyone!" That's the sort of thing that is likely going on. You see it in B's posts where he is like NO WE REALLY WERE A DUAL TEAM (false) AND WE WERE BETTER (false) AND WE DELIVERED THE PLAYBOOK (false) all based on Defango's bullshit origin story that he went to defcon and had a secret meeting and hey presto he datefags further back, rather than joining discord later, like a fucking faggot.
Bingo. The unfettered access is so good.
QR fuckery tracker
Watch them further rape that anon because I noticed they were and they'll blame them for being me
Maybe the socks was about the punisher symbol, and kash's i was about who it was? As in, someone sang and/or was sentenced to death?
It also relates to 44 via 'infiltration' and the antifa shooter event on independence day.
https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/united-tower/14693
United? Twisty Tower Tavern?
https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/27/how-obama-caved-on-bahrain-manama-human-rights/
https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_HER_149_0022--us-policy-in-the-persian-gulf.htm
https://www.jstor.org/stable/42864122
Much less depressing interpretation, kek
They too shall feel the feeling of independence from the UK, by force if need be! Feeling of impending doom huh.
That's good seeing it all laid out like that.