>>3072

>>3073

Welcome back Inauthentic Anon

“The Sons and Daughters of America Are Not Foot Soldiers for Your Party’s Inept Geriatric Despot… To be Dispatched at the Whims of an Idiot” – Rep. Madison Cawthorne

North Carolina Representative Madison Cawthorne dropped some bombs on the House floor while arguing against dispatching troops to Ukraine “on the whims of an idiot”.

Mediaite reported:

Madam Speaker, the sons and daughters of America are not foot soldiers for your party’s inept geriatric despot. They are not expendable pawns to be dispatched at the whims of an idiot, tossed carelessly around the world to godforsaken caves and bloody sand boxes. They are Americans, worthy of honor and dignity. The only salute from them Joe Biden deserves involves one finger…

“The path to American national security does not lie in American international interventionism,” he continued. “It lies in securing our southern border – not the Russia-Ukraine border. Our greatness is forged in our resistance to interference. The war lobby has no ally in the America First Republicans. We will preserve our strength through nationalism. We will champion America First today and America First forever.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/sons-daughters-america-not-foot-soldiers-partys-inept-geriatric-despot-dispatched-whims-idiot-rep-madison-cawthorne/

21-Year-Old Greek Football Player Dies on the Pitch Following Cardiac Arrest

A 21-year-old footballer died during a match after a sudden cardiac arrest with no defibrillator or ambulance available at the First Municipal Stadium during a match against Ermionida on Wednesday.

The attacking midfielder collapsed with just five minutes on the clock while playing for Greek team Ilioupoli. Doctors from both teams rushed in and tried to revive him, according to local reports. Unfortunately, the ambulance arrived at the scene for another 20 minutes so he was not revived immediately, the Sun reported. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

His death was announced by his team through social media without giving any further information about his death.

The club wrote [translated]: “Our Aleko, our friend, our brother, you left so unjustly. The whole team, the whole city is mourning today. The words do not come out… only an unbearable pain and a knot in the stomach. Have a good trip Alecara.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/new-normal-21-year-old-greek-football-player-dies-pitch-following-cardiac-arrest/

President Trump: Why Isn’t Unselect Committee Investigating the Massive Ballot Harvesting Operation that Has Just Been Irrefutably Reported?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/president-trump-isnt-unselect-committee-investigating-massive-ballot-harvesting-operation-just-irrefutably-reported/

Durham Filing Rebuts Inspector General Horowitz’s Claims on Missing Cellphones, Hints at Growing Rift

A supplemental court filing by special counsel John Durham confirms previous reporting that Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz concealed crucial information from Durham in connection with two separate investigations—the ongoing prosecution of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann and the criminal leak investigation of former FBI General Counsel James Baker.

The Jan. 28 filing by Durham updated the court on precisely when Durham first learned of two cellphones that had been used by Baker while he was with the FBI. The existence of these phones was first mentioned in a Jan. 25 filing, in which Durham claimed that the Inspector General’s Office (OIG) had failed to disclose its possession of two FBI cellphones belonging to Baker.

Following the Jan. 25 filing, Horowitz’s office apparently told Durham that the existence of one of the cellphones may have been mentioned on a conference call that took place four years ago.

“The OIG Special Agent had a conference call with members of the investigative team, including Mr. Durham, during which the cellphones likely were discussed,” reads the Jan. 28 court filing.

However, Durham states in the filing that he not only doesn’t recall the conference call, but also that he had no knowledge of Horowitz’s possession of Baker’s cellphones before being informed of their existence by a separate investigative team within the FBI on Jan. 6.

Notably, Horowitz is unable to say with certainty that Baker’s phone was even mentioned on the Feb. 12, 2018, conference call. Moreover, at the time of the conference call, Horowitz’s office was not in possession of either of Baker’s cell phones.

While Horowitz did gain possession of Baker’s phone several days later, on Feb. 15, 2018, there’s no record that he informed Durham. Nor is there any record of subsequent communications between Howowitz’s office and Durham regarding the Baker phone. This despite the fact that Durham was conducting a criminal leak investigation into Baker at around the same time that Horowitz gained access to Baker’s cellphone.

Although it isn’t currently known when Horowitz took possession of a second Baker cellphone, there appears to have been no follow-up from either Horowitz or Durham at the time, suggesting that neither of the phones had ever been mentioned to Durham. This is further supported by the fact that as recently as Jan. 5, Durham was seeking Baker’s “call log data” from the FBI’s Inspection Division, suggesting he didn’t know about Horowitz’s possession of Baker’s phones.

While Horowitz’s objection to Durham’s Jan. 25 filing may have been intended to deflect from his office’s disclosure failures, the latest filing raises further questions.

Even if Horowitz’s new claims about the alleged 2018 conference call were true, this wouldn’t have absolved him from disclosing this information in 2021, when he was formally requested by Durham to do so.

However, the most significant revelation contained in the supplemental filing is that Horowitz didn’t object to the other assertions made by Durham in his Jan. 25 filing.

That filing highlighted Horowitz’s failure to cooperate with Durham’s special counsel investigation. In addition to not disclosing the existence of Baker’s cellphones, Horowitz also failed to disclose that he and his general counsel had personally met with Sussmann regarding a “cyber matter” in March 2017, and Horowitz may have failed to disclose the identity of a Hillary Clinton-connected individual who provided the underlying data to Sussmann that led to the in-person meeting.

All of these undisclosed facts are crucial to Durham’s case against Sussmann.

Notably, Durham didn’t learn about this information from Horowitz, but rather from other sources, including Sussmann himself.

https://www.ntd.com/durham-filing-rebuts-inspector-general-horowitzs-claims-on-missing-cellphones-hints-at-growing-rift_735634.html

J&J and Drug Distributors to Pay $589 Million Settlement to Native American Tribes Over Opioid Crisis

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and three of the nation’s largest drug wholesalers and distributors have agreed to pay $589 million in settlement after hundreds of native tribes accused the companies of fueling the opioid crisis in their communities.

The three pharmaceutical distributors—Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen Corp., and McKesson Corp.—will pay more than $439 million in settlement over seven years. The Janssen-owned Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay $150 million over two years.

The plaintiffs accused J&J of understating the addiction risks of opioids in its marketing campaign, and accused the distributors of letting addictive painkillers be diverted into illegal channels, according to court filings (pdf).

The native tribes, represented by the Tribal Leadership Community, stated in court filings that tribal governments have had to spend “considerable tribal funds to cover the costs of the opioid crisis” including costs for “health care, social services, child welfare, law enforcement, and other government services” which has imposed “severe financial burdens” on the plaintiffs.

“We’re not solving the opioid crisis with the settlement, but we are getting critical resources to tribal communities to address the crisis,” stated Steven Skikos, a lawyer for the tribes, in a telephonic court hearing, according to Reuters.

J&J told Reuters in a statement that it did not admit wrongdoing in the settlement and that the company was “appropriate and responsible” in its role of promoting opioid pain relief prescription medications.

This follows a 2019 lawsuit in which the drug distributors agreed to pay $75 million to resolve similar claims made by Cherokee Nation, one of the largest Cherokee tribes recognized by the federal government.

A 2016 report (pdf) released by the National Congress of American Indians found that American Indians suffered the highest rate (8.4 overdose deaths per capita) of opioid overdoses, followed by whites (7.9 overdose deaths per capita).

All 574 federally recognized tribes will be able to receive money from the settlements even if they had not filed the lawsuits, according to Tara Sutton, an attorney for the tribes, in a Feb. 1 statement to The Wall Street Journal.

The settlement comes a week after 44 U.S. states agreed to a $26 billion settlement proposed by the three drug distributors and J&J to resolve thousands of similar lawsuits accusing the companies of fueling the opioid epidemic.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., and Janssen for comment.

https://www.ntd.com/jj-and-drug-distributors-to-pay-589-million-settlement-to-native-american-tribes-over-opioid-crisis_735654.html

Mike Pompeo

@mikepompeo

The world is safer today because ISIS leader Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi alInauthentic Anonurayshi is dead.

11:17 AM · Feb 3, 2022·Twitter Web App

https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1489271829571194884

JonDoodle setting up a new kayfabe excuse for baker tripcodes

The FDA accepts legal aid from Pfizer and delays releasing licensure pages till May

As the Lynnwood Times reported previously, Federal Judge Mark T. Pittman of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to accelerate the release of an estimated 451,000 pages of material related to the licensing of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on January 6, 2022.

The FDA must produce “more than 12,000 pages” on or before January 31, 2022. From there, the administration is required to produce “the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete,” according to the court order.

Most recently, however, the FDA has asked the court to delay making the first round of 55,000 pages public till May 2022. The FDA has also accepted legal aid from Pfizer.

FDA’s push back due to staffing issues

Pushback from the FDA has primarily focused on staffing issues. As Reuters reported on January 7, “The FDA didn’t dispute it had an obligation to make the information public but argued that its short-staffed FOIA office only had the bandwidth to review and release 500 pages a month.”

According to court documents, the FDA originally only “allocated the equivalent of nearly 11 full-time staff to this project.”

Then, to meet the demand of reviewing so many papers, “The FDA […] plans to hire 15 contractors, ‘detail’ 8 agency employees, and assign 5.5 of its normal review staff to the project, for a total of 28.5 reviewers.” It seems a daunting task, then, to have less than 30 workers review 55,000 pages in one month.

As a result, the FDA “insists it must delay its first 55,000-page production until May 1, 2022 – four months after the Court entered its order.”

However, the FDA received Pfizer’s Biologics License Application (BLA) in May of 2021, which, again, included more than 450,000 pages, and was able to review and approve the application by August that same year according to the administration’s approval letter. To accomplish this task, the FDA would have had to examine roughly 112,500 pages a month.

FDA accepts legal aid from Pfizer

On January 21, the FDA accepted Pfizer’s legal aid. The pharmaceutical company persisted its involvement would be necessary to prevent exposing trade secrets and confidential commercial information to the public.

As the court document states, “due to the unprecedented speed with which the Court has ordered FDA to process the records at issue, FDA anticipates that coordination with Pfizer to obtain the company’s views as to which portions of the records are subject to Exemption 4, the Trade Secrets Act (“TSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1905, or other statutory protections will be a necessary component of the agency’s endeavors to meet the extraordinary exigencies of this case.”

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/81685/the-fda-accepts-legal-aid-from-pfizer-and-delays-releasing-licensure-pages-till.html

https://twitter.com/Independent/status/1488608713841811457

https://mobile.twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1489265190751256580

Don't let Biden WH twist it, local reports from the raid in Syria highlight a total disaster.

-At least 10 women and children murdered.

-ISIS leader blew himself up before he was apprehended.

-US lost a helicopter and was forced to then bomb it.

There's much more to this story.

Police in Canada order truckers to remove their vehIckes, or they will seize them, and take them all to jail.

We have quite the stand-off in Ottawa about to take place, while the whole world watches on with great hope.

https://gab.com/BeachMilk/posts/107734151878871814

So I guess this is confirmaton that Q Research BO is at least concerned @papitrumpo is PDJT, if not they had left the posts and used it for ridicule. Kek, busted again.

Currently the RNC is having discussion about the

@GOP

pulling completely out of the Commission for Presidential Debates

Marc Elias Makes Millions Off Democratic Gerrymandering Efforts

Lawyer is involved in efforts to redraw congressional districts in New York, Maryland

Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias has long decried the evils of gerrymandering. Now, he's getting rich off it.

Democratic and progressive groups paid Elias's firm more than $1 million in the most recent quarter, according to Federal Election Commission records released this week. One of Elias's biggest clients, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, is leading efforts to redraw congressional districts in New York and Maryland. With polls indicating Democratic losses in November, the controversial gerrymander scheme is seen as the party's best hope of maintaining majority control of Congress.

The effort opens both parties up to allegations of hypocrisy. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D., N.Y.), the chairman of the DCCC who worked with Elias to redraw New York’s maps, accused Republicans last year of using gerrymandering to win control of the House. Elias has repeatedly accused Republicans of partisan gerrymandering. He recently sued to block North Carolina and Ohio from adopting maps he claimed are unfair to Democrats.

Elias Law Group has raked in millions of dollars since Elias launched it in August. The DCCC paid the firm $424,048 in December, according to campaign filings. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee paid the firm $492,560. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D., N.Y.) Senate Majority PAC paid Elias Law Group another $162,797.

The firm received another $40,000 collectively from Priorities USA Action, the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, George Soros’s Democracy PAC, and former attorney general Eric Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee. The Lincoln Project, the anti-Trump PAC founded by former Republican operatives, paid Elias Law Group $45,288.

Of all of Elias’s legal maneuverings, his work with the DCCC could have the most political impact in November. Elias and Maloney have pushed for changes to congressional districts that could help Democrats pick up as many as seven seats. FiveThirtyEight said New York's maps were "heavily biased" in favor of Democrats and, if approved by the state legislature, could single-handedly protect the party’s House majority in November.

The proposed map would put Democrats in control of around 80 percent of the state’s House seats, far higher than the 62 percent vote share Democrats received in House races in the Empire State in 2020. Maloney has defended the gerrymandered maps, saying that Republicans are using the tactic to pick up seats in red states. "I believe in bringing a gun to a gunfight," he told Politico.

Elias and the DCCC are behind a similar effort in Maryland. Prior to the DCCC and Elias joining forces with Maryland Democrats to push for the gerrymander in court, state-level Democrats jettisoned their pledge for a transparent redistricting process and crafted their maps almost entirely behind closed doors and with no public input.

This is not the first instance of Democrats doing the type of gerrymandering they decry. Holder, who formed the National Democratic Redistricting Committee to fight gerrymandering, waged an effort to draw up Pennsylvania’s electoral maps to protect Democratic seats. Holder’s group, which is heavily funded by foreign billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, paid Elias’s firm $10,000 in recent months, according to FEC filings.

Elias, whom liberals tout as a champion of election integrity, has a history of defending questionable political tactics. In Nevada, Elias Law Group defended an ad from an advocacy group aligned with Schumer’s Senate Majority PAC that wildly inflated Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto's (D., Nev.) accomplishments.

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/marc-elias-makes-millions-off-democratic-gerrymandering-efforts/

Freedom Convoy Demonised – CIA-colour revolutions celebrated

Since the 22nd of January, despite receiving no mainstream media coverage whatsoever, thousands of Canadian truck drivers and their supporters embarked on a Freedom Convoy throughout the world’s second-largest country, a mass-protest in response to the Canadian government’s decision to widen their already authoritarian Covid measures by mandating that truck drivers re-entering Canada from the United States, the world’s largest land-border and a vital component of the Canadian economy, have to be fully vaccinated – vaccine passports being a key step towards the Digital ID system as envisaged by Klaus Schwab’s concept of the fourth industrial revolution, with the World Economic Forum chairman previously highlighting Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as one of the group’s ‘young global leaders’ during a 2017 conference.

With the Freedom Convoy converging on the Canadian capital Ottawa on Saturday however, the week-long media silence on the protest disappeared only to be quickly replaced by widespread mainstream media condemnation, with the use of likely agent provocateurs leading to the protest being widely lambasted, in lockstep, as ‘far-right’ and ‘fascist’ by corporate-owned outlets – the irony of the Convoy being against the very fascist concept of the fusion of state and corporate power via the use of vaccine mandates being lost it would seem.

This condemnation by the mainstream media of a genuine working-class protest against public officials working on behalf of corporate interests however, lies in stark contrast to their recent response to CIA-engineered regime change operations, masquerading as ‘human rights protests’ and which involved the use of genuine extremists, receiving the full support of the corporate media whilst doing so.

Less than three weeks prior to the Freedom Convoy setting off on its initial journey, protests against rising fuel prices in Kazakhstan rapidly escalated into extreme violence, resulting in the deaths of 18 Kazakh security services members in the space of four days, including two who were decapitated , and leading to the Moscow-led CSTO (Collective Security Treaty Organisation) being deployed into the central Asian nation at the request of Nur-Sultan in order to quell what was a clear attempt at a colour revolution in line with a May 2020 policy document published by Neoconservative think tank , the RAND Corporation – which outlined regime-change in Kazakhstan as a means to destabilise neighbouring Russia in turn.

This attempt at regime change in Kazakhstan, countered by the CSTO in less than two weeks and who subsequently withdrew from Kazakhstan afterwards, came amidst a time of increased tensions between Russia and the West, with Moscow being accused of planning an ‘imminent’ invasion of neighbouring Ukraine since the end of November – with Kiev itself subjected to the 2014 Euromaidan colour revolution, launched by the CIA and MI6 in response to then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s November 2013 decision to suspend an EU trade deal in favour of pursuing closer ties with the Kremlin, and like the colour revolution attempt in Kazakhstan, also involved the use of extremist elements such as the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, who would go on to wage war on the pro-Russian breakaway Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk in the East of the Country.

https://southfront.org/freedom-convoy-demonised-cia-colour-revolutions-celebrated/

NEW - Cross-sectional study finds "evidence of natural immunity in unvaccinated healthy US adults up to 20 months after confirmed COVID-19 infection."

"It is unclear how these antibody levels correlate with protection against future infections." However, the findings merit further consideration for public health implications, the researchers say.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1489293156164292611

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788894

NFL star slams Congress for trading stocks while players are banned from betting on games

Detroit Lions' Tyrell Crosby says lawmakers essentially can manipulate a stock

Normally he protects quarterbacks. But Detroit Lions offensive tackle Tyrell Crosby is straying into politics and causing a stir by questioning why members of Congress are allowed to trade stock when they can influence financial policy.

"If as an NFL player we aren't allowed to bet on games (which I fully agree with), why are government officials allowed to buy stocks/stock options?" Crosby tweeted last month.

He explained on Wednesday's "Just the News" TV show with editor-in-chief John Solomon and cohost Amanda Head his thoughts behind that tweet, after which he started advocating online for reforming trading laws.

"I was just in bed having random thoughts," and after seeing an ad for sports betting, the 26-year-old said, "It just hit me."

"As an NFL player, I'm not allowed to bet on any NFL games. I can't do any of that stuff," he said.

"But then you've got people in Congress, and they're able to trade stocks," despite being able to implement policies that can "drastically affect" the market, Crosby said. "They can essentially manipulate a stock."

Crosby is excited for the Super Bowl and said he predicts it will be a "really good game."

"Joe Burrow has been playing lights out lately, Ja'Marr Chase is a stud. He's just a straight-up stud," Crosby said, adding, that Matthew Stafford is "literally the man. So I'm rooting for Stafford just because I had the privilege of blocking for him."

Stafford was the Lions' primary starter from 2009 to 2020, before he was traded to the Rams. Chase described Stafford as "laser-focused" and said, "whatever he's about to do, it's about to be great."

Turning to Tom Brady's retirement after 22 seasons with the NFL, Crosby said he was surprised, but understands.

"I was shocked that he decided to retire. It makes sense. I mean, with his age and everything he's accomplished," he said, describing Brady as "one of the best football players to ever play."

COVID presented NFL players with unique challenges, specifically with the risk of infecting teammates.

"I love having my family come to games, I love having my friends there," Crosby said, but during COVID, games often did not have an audience.

"It was hard to just live your normal life knowing like if you test positive, you're affecting your whole team," Crosby said. "It was a lot of stress."

Solomon then asked the NFL player for his thoughts on paying college athletes.

https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/detroit-lions-tyrell-crosby-criticizes-congress-they-can-essentially-manipulate

>>3105

kek

>>3107

Let 'em try, I can't think of anything that will send armed Americans over the border faster to support their leaf brothers.

UK Government plans to remove Human Rights in the UK “for the greater good” and will apply reforms to the Unvaccinated

Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill Of Rights

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040409/human-rights-reform-consultation.pdf

In December they produced a document – a consultation to reform the Human Rights Act 1998. I am all for reform, if it is done for the right reasons and in the right way, but there are some worrying parts of the document which I will go through below. All emphasis is my own.

By ‘The Naked Emperor’

On page 35 it discusses “a ‘rights culture’ that displaces personal responsibility and the public interest”. It says –

“the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest. Many of the rights in the Convention are ‘qualified’, recognising explicitly the need to respect the rights of others and the broader needs of society”.

I’m sure we all agree that we should respect other people’s rights and consider the broader needs of society. However, these considerations should not trump an individual’s rights which should remain fundamental in a free society. Any talk of changing laws or removing individual’s rights for the greater good, public interest or the needs of society, has never resulted in good outcomes.

The document continues –

“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.

It goes on to describe examples of prisoners using human rights laws to challenge decisions when they “themselves showed a flagrant disregard for the rights of other”.

We’re not in the school playground but obviously the childhood lesson hasn’t been learnt – two wrongs don’t make a right! So, if someone is to show disregard to the rights of others, they are not allowed to have human rights themselves?

For each case it describes, it mentions the mediocre (in the scheme of things) legal fees that the government has to pay, even when the claimant loses the case. The government has just written off £4.3 billion in Covid loans to fraudsters so I’m sure they have a spare few million to ensure everybody’s (whether they are criminals or not) human rights are adhered to.

The section concludes –

“Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/03/uk-government-to-remove-human-rights-for-the-greater-good/

Schumer-aligned dark money group hauls in record $92 million from hidden donors

A dark money group aligned with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer raked in a record $92 million from anonymous donors to flood groups with money to elect Democrats, records show.

Majority Forward, a nonprofit affiliated with Schumer's Senate Majority PAC, pocketed the cash between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020, its most recently released tax forms show. The group pushed millions to other liberal groups during this time, including the New York Democrat's PAC and nonprofits that work on voter engagement efforts.

But as the left-wing group pulled in record cash, Schumer and other Democratic politicians assailed Republicans over their use of dark money, even as they quietly benefited from far more unidentified donor cash.

"Majority Forward is kind of a dark money empire that the Democrat Party really doesn't want to talk about, especially Chuck Schumer," Parker Thayer, an investigator at the Capital Research Center, told Fox News.

"It's not just them either," he continued. "They control a network of four different dark money nonprofit groups as well, and all of this money eventually goes to Democrat-aligned PACs, and the initial donors behind it are essentially untraceable."

Majority Forward's latest money haul was a $16 million increase over its previous high of $76 million in contributions from its prior fiscal year.

From mid-2015 to mid-2018, the group reported a combined $69 million in revenue, meaning its two most recent fiscal years eclipsed the three previous years before that by nearly $100 million in contributions.

Majority Forward did not respond to a request for comment.

Schumer and other Democratic politicians, meanwhile, recently demanded right-leaning organizations publicly disclose their donors and chastised Republicans over their dark money ties.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-aligned-dark-money-group-hauls-in-record-92-million-from-hidden-donors

My Biker Warriors tell me they want to join Our Beautiful Freedom Fiesta This Spring!!! NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT'S COMING!!!

https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1489305320748986370?cxt=HHwWhMC91Y3TiaspAAAA

>>3115

theepochtimes.com

EXCLUSIVE: Trump on Durham Probe: 'I Hear There's a Lot Coming'

Ivan Pentchoukov

4-5 minutes

Former President Donald Trump has heard that “there’s a lot coming” from the wide-ranging investigation led by Special Counsel John Durham, who is probing the origins of the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

“I hear there’s a lot coming,” Trump told former top aide Kash Patel on The Epoch Times’ “Kash’s Corner.” The interview will premiere at 8 p.m. Eastern on Feb. 7 on EpochTV.com.

“We’re gonna see what happens. But what he’s doing is one of the most important jobs being done right now in America.”

Attorney General William Barr assigned Durham on May 13, 2019, to investigate the origins of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, codenamed Crossfire Hurricane. In October 2020, with the presidential election approaching, Barr designated Durham as a special counsel to protect the criminal investigation in case of a change of guard at the White House in 2021.

Video Player is loading.

Current Time 0:00

Duration -:-

Remaining Time 0:00

Durham secured the first guilty plea in August 2020, prior to his appointment as a special counsel. Former FBI assistant general counsel Kevin Clinesmith admitted to forging an email used to prepare an application to surveil former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page. Clinesmith was sentenced to probation for a single charge of making false statements related to the forgery.

In September and November last year, Durham brought indictments against Russian national Igor Danchenko, the primary source of the infamous Steele dossier, and against Michael Sussman, the attorney for the Clinton campaign in 2016.

Epoch Times Photo

Former President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., on Jan. 31, 2022. (The Epoch Times)

Trump has previously expressed frustration with the pace of Durham’s investigation. In March last year, he issued a statement saying, “Where’s Durham? Is he a living, breathing human being? Will there ever be a Durham report?”

The former president told Epoch TV he still wishes the investigation would move faster.

“I wish it were faster,” Trump said. “It is really the crime of the century and changed everything, including the election.”

John Durham

John Durham speaks at a conference in New Haven, Conn., on Sept. 20, 2018. (Courtesy of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut)

Some of the earliest evidence of misconduct in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation emerged in a report prepared by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee in early 2018.

After, an internal inquiry by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (OIG) yielded two significant reports. The first detailed a pattern of intense political bias against Trump by the key officials involved in the Crossfire Hurricane probe. The second found 17 major errors in the FBI’s Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court applications to spy on Carter Page. The responsibility for the mistakes ran to the top of the chain of command at the FBI, according to the inspector general, Michael Horowitz.

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifies in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington on Dec. 11, 2019. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)

Horowitz ultimately concluded that, despite the errors, the FBI opened the investigation of the Trump campaign on lawful grounds. Durham publicly disagreed with that finding, issuing a formal statement in December 2019 explaining that his investigation reached beyond the Department of Justice and its components.

Recent court filings by Durham in the Sussman case show that Horowitz withheld vital evidence from the special counsel in the Sussman prosecution and the criminal leak investigation of former FBI General Counsel James Baker. According to the filings, Horowitz’s office failed to disclose that it was in possession of two of Baker’s cellphones.

Pelosi says she has not provided any information to Jan. 6 panel

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday said she has not provided any information to the select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Asked during her weekly press conference if she has provided any testimony or documents to the investigative panel, Pelosi said “no,” adding “I keep as far away from the committee as possible.”

Pressed on if she expects to be asked about various matters including evacuation procedures, Pelosi said “I have no idea.”

“I know about what they do the way you do, in the public domain. We authorized them, we give them the resources they need to do what they do, but that is the work of the committee,” she said. “It has nothing to do with me.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/592694-pelosi-says-she-has-not-provided-any-information-to-jan-6-panel