>>>/qresearch/16653628
>>>/qresearch/16653628
I think they deleted all TOR posts in the bread...
^^^ that post is gone, and was most likely the second zero delta post called out ^^^
>How many coincidences before MATHEMATICALLY impossible?
for this anon?
we were LONG PAST coincidence with all of the related comms from scavino/ nunes/ kash
++ US Naval Institute/ all other service branches obviously
notable shout out to US Army Ft. Sill
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
>You are asking Q to hack someone elses website.
no
we are pointing out Jim can just copypasta this new tripcode into his custom_tripcode exploit and post with it if he chooses
how it is safeguarded?
do we still need a 0 delta with POTUS everytime?
>right now I trust Q.
0 delta confirms
no doubt in my mind
>But if I saw that same trip again I wouldn't.
I am kinda in this boat
will be hungry for 0 delta confirmation for any further comms
we have to "test all spirits" at all times
at least thats how I feel on this thing
trust but verify
and then re-verify every fucking time
at least on this comp'd site
and I dont see how we ever arrive at a site that cant be "comp'd"
anti-fragile means we need be comfy living behind enemy lines
sooner that we think, kek
>Holy shit what's your score?
so far I got 3 bans saved for posting Q 0 deltas
but the most cherrished one is the permaban they gave me on my years old clearnet IP hash
what a great reason to never post on that fucking board ever again
I agree
its going to be a bitch to attempt to parse out the Q/ not Q TOR posts from that bread on /qr/
the zero delta post
and the post with the exact zero delta timestamps are the only ones from /qr/ I trust
I trust all the !! tripcodes ones here on /hm/ just now
for whats its worth
our current list from the drops last week
I parsed those on discernment alone
(meaning all the TOR posts we have in our current "Previous Q Drops" list)
I kind of assumed Q would correct us if we scraped innacurately
but that may not be a safe assumption
I am rather open to suggestions/ ideas on this