00000000

>>26361

I disagree. These are verified. Q got the 0 delta and then came here and used the same TRIP as last time.

>>26367

We all know who POTUS is, the person Q got the 0 Delta with.

>>26369

>q's posts have all been clearnet. these, are not

The first 0 Delta was a tor post. The only non-tor-posts was the 0 Delta tonight, and the original post on this board. Which was done because they posted screenshots to verify the torpost.

>>26373

You can't post pictures from TOR.

>>26377

If you call them "unverified" you are saying every post on this board is not Q. Do anons believe that to be so?

>>26381

>>26381

>give me a paste for the headpost and i'll use that.

Not sure what you mean, explain

>>26382

>>26383

You're baking, I'm not gonna tell you what to do, but here is how I see it.

First ZD Q posted on qr got a ZD and came here on clearnet on an IP never used before. Posted screenshots to confirm (you)'s and created a trip. Said trip would not be used for verification, a ZD would be used.

Tonight, they got another ZD on a clearnet post. Confirmed it on TOR, came here, stayed on TOR because they did not need to post pics again, and used the previous to establish ID after getting the ZD. Burned old Trip, made new one and 3 posts. Confirming they will always verify with a ZD moving forward.

>>26385

>You're a bo. if you don't like my notes or headpost, tell me what you want. you threw the colors, you tell me.

You asked for instuctions last time from BO, my UID changed when I restarted PC. Still not telling you how to do, giving you my opinion.

>>26387

IMO under these circumstances, it the best/most verification we can get.

>>26393

So, if my understanding is correct, you believe Q only made one post tonight?

>>26399

>If you guys don't tell me how to proceed and give me fucking paste i'm handing off.

I've said my piece, I think they are verified as good as we could hope for. This is not a dictatorship. I leave it up to the anons present.

Same ID has 2 other posts in bread

>>26409

>>>/qresearch/16653931 no Q signiture

How does this post relate?

>>26410

Oh, it's a tor post as well.

>>26419

How? You are basing this off the same id having 2 other posts, I thought we were all well aware Q posted with a trip occasionally. It looks to me more like the ZD poster was jumping back & forth between Tor/clearnet and fucked up. I don't see how someone could game getting a zero delta. And if it was Jim & they wouldn't use the zero delta to shit on themselves.

>>26422

> Q posted without a trip occasionally*

>>26424

No, i gotta work in the AM.

>>26427

>>26429

So the only explanation is the custom_tripcode was used to get the TRIP from last time? How else could they have it?

>>26433

It's not a single whack. it had two !! in the front.

>>26434

>It's not a single whack. it had two !! in the front.

You literally just posted a screenshot of it.

>>26437

Who's they?

>>26441

>>26440

Or, using custom_tripcode someone made posts under the same tripcode that was supposed to never be used again.

>>26446

>>26445

>>26444

Explain what?

>>26449

>>26450

You're both ignoring the custom_tripcode setting. The tripcode part seems easy to explain to than the zero delta.

>>26451

easier*

>>26452

>the zero delta poster having the same IP hash as some rando anon in the /qr/ bread is not as easy for me to reconcile

>like

>at all

Q has been known to post as a regular anon from the same IP, former BVs have screenshots.

>>26454

>so you agree that the thing that happened in here tonight is a larp?

I agree that you seem to be trying to get me to say that.

>>26454

>so you agree that the thing that happened in here tonight is a larp?

I agree the tripcode would be easier to spoof than the ZD while also claiming to be Q.

>>26461

And I agree the tripcode would be MUCH easier to spoof than 2 zero deltas while claiming to be Q. Show me how that happens.

>>26460

> I just think tor Q lied

Your negating the literal reason they said the trip would never be used again. To defend from Jim using custom_tripcode to spoof the new trip. Wasn't that the whole point?

>>26463

I saw a Q same-ip post of Q calling a twitter influencer a fat whore or something along those lines.

>>26465

Show me how it happens twice. Not once.

>>26470

>sorry, not buying the posts here tonight without more..

Why are you apologizing. We just agreed.

>>26474

At this point it throws ALL tripcodes into a completely unconfirmable status.

>>26473

>is theONEof their posts that they signed with a Q

>that would be a remarkable coincidence

>there is no way Jcrew could plan on being able to do that at will

>I will give you that

This. They had 3 posts and only signed 1 as Q. And that one post got the ZD.

>>26481

>>>/qresearch/16653451

>>>/qresearch/16653509

>>26484

One of the posts from the UID was pointing at a TOR post calling it new Q.

>>>/qresearch/16653451

>>>/qresearch/16653442

Then dart banned the TORposter. Maybe they is why they switched to clearnet?

>>26486

Why are you addin the non-signed posts. Q specifically said not to do that.

>>26488

>Then dart banned the TORposter.

>>26494

>>26496

No, Q specifically said to not list posts they make without being signed as Q, for the reason that Q does post as an anon. I can't remember the exact wording and I am to tired to search for it

>>26502

I think we should add the zd one and at leasst the deleted one's cap since the same UID pointed it out.

>>26500

>>26500

>there are at least 2 posts deleted that were referenced by the anons in that bread attempting to track the 0 delta

>we dont know what those posts were or what UID they were posted under

This was the only one I saw.

>>26509

This verifies that the zero poster pointed to the Q posting from tor and called it New Q.

>>26511

I'm pretty sure that was the only one deleted. The zero delta happened 5 minutes after and Dart didn't delete anything else.

>>26512

Same here. G'night all.

>>26517

Which would explain the jump to clearnet.

>>26546

17 stars, holy shit, 17 stars.17 fucking stars

No on cares.