>>26888

Are we just going to ignore the elephant in the room that the whole investigation into election fraud in AZ was just dropped, and pretend like it's going to be different this time after doing nothing?

I really don't understand what is going on.

>>26898

>>26909

Seems like at some point you actually have to do something to stop people from just cheating again.

Even if the head is fake and gay, the people cheating really are cheating, and nothing stopped them last time, so what stops them this time? Is that Veritas comms saying they're going to fuck you up this time?

I just have no faith in people anymore. I guess we'll see. More interested in results than predictions.

>>26876

>>26894

>>26908

Random anon agrees, but can I make a suggestion? The posts inside of a day should be in reverse order, so you get a timeline going up/down the links, rather than out of order by day.

o7

Internet down in canadia

>>27239

>>27240

>>27244

>>27245

Are these boards on different servers? How can you attack one board and not bork the whole thing? I don't understand the architecture I guess.

>>27269

I'm just saying if a board is being spammed like crazy, you need to have some pretty sophisticated sharding and spam mitigation for it to only affect one board and not the whole site.

I guess it's theoretically possible that /qresearch/ is treated differently because it's the highest trafficked board by far (most likely? I don't know that for sure), but after looking at the source of the site, I don't have much faith in the admins here to actually pull that off. But I've been surprised before.

>>27275

To be clear: I agree with this. I haven't studied the "attack" at all, and so am just going by what people said happened, but if everything got pushed in 1 minute, it would either take a highly sophisticated external attack (given the rate limiting and the issues anons have posting), or a botched replay attack where the idiot who ran the script forgot to sleep between updating the db.

I still don't get the ultimate point, but that's because I have been in and out with irl shit.

>>27280

You're asking if I think Q might have fucked up their board because they're kike cunts?

I think it's unlikely, but possible. Second scenario is more likely, but not only.

>>27283

>>27282

This is the issue I've had with this whole thing from the beginning. The "good guys" (Q et al) know the answer, the "bad guys" (Jim, kikes et al) know the answer, but I do not know the answer. And I find that immensely frustrating, but I'm not going to pigeon hole myself into one answer because it makes me feel good.

As I tell everyone around me who is starting to wake up: "I can't tell you what is happening, I can only tell you what isn't happening."