I agree with this call.
Could use asterisk instead to make it more readable but that's an esthetic decision, not substance. Do it how you like.
How about an asterisk next to the "Q's Latest Posts"? What do you think? Doesn't that statement need a qualifier as well?
Thank you Kekbees
I showed 8bit waiting on response and emailed OSS
I still think there should be an asterisk or something next to "Q's Latest Posts"
However you want to note that this is speculative based on Double Zero Delta. Maybe even call it that. That is my single BO opinion at this point. Waiting for input from others.
somebody with Telegram should check him there for that post
ETheFriend is EyeTheSpy
a deboonked LARPer who is advocated by Jim.
Very involved in Julian Assange case now. Defango and Cicada guys have been as well in the past.
Disclosure Backpack debunked one of his videos as a fake a couple years ago and he changed names. I'll see if I can find that debunk video.
Anyone care to apply the google cache trick that Freddy mentioned on this article? It's gone...
We gotta get better at remembering to archive.
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/jim-watkins-duped-fake-q-tripcode/%20%20https:/archive.ph/QuIqO
I personally log in as BO constantly.
There are 3 of us.... Imagine how often it occurs
AMA THREAD
Looks like we've had lots of tech discussion in here today. Don't forget the AMA with Freddy thread. Please forward your speculation, conclusions and questions over there for the 8chan developer to address. We have a rare opportunity to get definitive answers about what is possible and probable given the code he wrote. I doubt he will be reading these breads so posting thoughts and questions there will l get them seen.
Looks like no because SEC said they did not live up to terms
Quit responding to me weirdo
https://www.theepochtimes.com/elon-musk-files-to-exit-twitter-deal_4586582.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=truthsocial
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said he is exiting his multi-billion-dollar deal with Twitter over concerns about its spam bots, a newly revealed SEC filing shows.
“While Section 6.4 of the Merger Agreement requires Twitter to provide Mr. Musk and his advisers all data and information that Mr. Musk requests ‘for any reasonable business purpose related to the consummation of the transaction,’ Twitter has not complied with its contractual obligations,” reads a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated July 8, 2022.
“For nearly two months, Mr. Musk has sought the data and information necessary to ‘make an independent assessment of the prevalence of fake or spam accounts on Twitter’s platform,'” the filing continued.
Musk’s lawyer noted how the information on the pervasiveness of the social media platform’s bot accounts is “fundamental to Twitter’s business and financial performance” and is “necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.”
The information on fake or spam accounts on the platform, Musk’s lawyers continued, “is needed to ensure Twitter’s satisfaction of the conditions to closing, to facilitate Mr. Musk’s financing and financial planning for the transaction, and to engage in transition planning for the business.”
Additional information Musk has been attempting to request from Twitter include the monetizable daily active usage or users (mDAU), Twitter’s process for auditing the inclusion of spam and fake accounts in its mDAU count, the platform’s methods for catching and suspending spam and fake accounts, and materials showing Twitter’s financial condition.
The SEC filing noted how Musk and his Morgan Stanley advisers have been requesting this information since May 9, but Twitter has “failed to provide much of the data and information” Musk requested.
Please qualify the "Q's Latest Posts" in some way, however you like best. It could be 2ZeroDelta Q, Q?, /hm/Q, potential Q, asterisk, whatever you like best. But I do not feel comfortable, as a board, proclaiming those posts to be real Q definitively like that, even though that possibility is far more likely than what they are passing off on /qr/ imo
BO Bella
Ok I think if this board is proclaiming it as a certainty at the top of each bread we need to be clear about it as a group and I thought we're leaning toward the possibility but not a certainty. Since the circumstances are suggestive and yet unclear, I thought designating the /hm/posting Q in some way makes sense. It should represent where we stand as a board , not just my own opinion. Chime in on your thoughts. Do we want to tell everyone visiting this board that is Q for sure? or explain why we think it might be in some way?
I like this
thanks o7
go back
I think the evidence is stronger to believe in this poster than the one on /qr/ but in these murky waters, we need to decide together if we want to state it as fact or provide the evidence of why we are considering it as possibly valid. I think the latter method provides new visitors to the board more information to base their own conclusion on, since these posts will not be on any aggregators. And we DO have a bunch of new visitors. Near double usual
I think it's funny too and don't mean to shit on baker's sense of humor but I am more serious about Q than anything else and feel the responsibility to respect and preserve OG Q on this board. Not sure it would be seen that way if we went that route. kek
Yeah it has to be spelled out in the header for maximum comprehension I think. Everyone would understand the acronym if we use it in our posts then.
BAM
kek
KEK
Thanks anon!