What did I miss? Hope OSS isn't missing...
Anyone think that he might have had this happen to him and that's why he's defensive about it?
Milo was defensive about his abuse saying he wanted it for years before he finally admitted it was wrong.
Anyone asking for your money is suspect, but it's more helpful to figure out why he's actually making the statements than to just shout him down. You don't learn anything by being a mob. That being said, if he's condoning this, he should be ostracized. But if he's just saying it's "less bad", well I don't really care about his opinion on more/less bad. He's not a moral authority, much less my moral authority.
God is love. God wins.
>It is not possible to destroy the jew with love, that is an absurd proposition; it's akin to loving your jailer or praising your executioner
And yet the jew was held down for hundreds of years when Catholicism had its rule. The jews then infiltrated and began to weaken the Church because people are weak, and don't want to rock the boat. But it will come back, and they will be destroyed by pure love, whether you like it or not. It's your choice which side you are on.
Most jews are satanists.
The reason Christ destroyed the temple is so that jews could no longer boast of their heritage. Their genealogies have been destroyed. They have no way to trace their lineage back.
If you want, you can be grafted into the tree of Israel by joining Christ's Church. But you will just as quickly be cut out if you fail to live up to His commands.
Fair enough, he's a faggot. But this is far more worth criticizing him for than his "hot takes", which are just complete smokescreens to real issues.
Gotta keep your eye on the ball, as the signal to noise ratio is incredibly low atm.
God does not annihilate anything. They go into the lake of fire.
Peter, Paul, James, Jon, Stephen, James, Andrew, Matthew, Phillip, Thomas, Jude Thaddeus, Bartholomew, Barnabas, Mark, Timothy, Philemon, etc., can all attest what letting your enemies kill you while preaching love can do for the world.
But so can Constantine.
If you're not Constantine, you're going to have much better luck as the former than the latter. But you'd have to actually know God and stop buying into the lies that you know anything, based on what you've said here.
Remember when I wrote this post:
You then responded with inane comments like:
>Ah so the abrupt changing of location and no longer existing on this plane doesn't count because you're taking the view of the Demon?
That's just an inane take. It doesn't actually address what I said at all. It's a question, not an argument, because, believe it or not, questions are not arguments.
So that goes for this as well:
>Have you taken Jesus into account?
As for this:
>Sword from Mouth isn't a literal vision, Millstones around necks and drowning in the sea is good as well,
It's just inane.
>I don't need to resort to hollywood to show you why "God is love" words are used to justify INACTION that God made possible in the first place.
What you have correct here is God did make inaction possible. He also made action possible. The real question is, action to what end. That's the question.
Given that you balk and rebel and screech so loudly over God being love, I think it's quite obvious you need correction on this issue. Because unless you get your ends in order, you're in spiritual danger.
So, there. I addressed your inane comments. Do you want to address my question now? If so, do you believe the following, and if not, what do you disagree with:
I believe in one God,
the Father almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead
and his kingdom will have no end.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins
and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
>The Nicaean Council happened in 325. to keep the lid on as it were.
A lid on what?
>The kjv was a protest bible.
Yes, because the King, after pledging fielty to the Pope, decided he wanted to have sex with someone who wasn't his wife. Then he decided that the Pope wasn't such a great guy because he refused to allow him to get divorce, so he broke away.
Real great role model you got there.
Ah. So when Christ said
>And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
He was just kidding. What He really meant, was that James was the true disciple, and everyone after you I'm too weak to destroy so they're just going to spread heresy for 2000 years?
That's your position?
The q source? You mean the thing scholars made up 1800 years later to cast doubt on the historicity of the Bible? That q source? The one that even Wikipedia says is hypothetical? That's your source? K.
>james did everything right
According to who?
>peter fucked up but jesus chose him anywway
Correct. We agree that God chose Peter, and you're choosing James. Why? Who knows.
>35 And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, come unto him, saying, Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.
>36 And he said unto them, What would ye that I should do for you?
>37 They said unto him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.
>38 But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask: can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?
>39 And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:
>40 But to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.
>41 And when the ten heard it, they began to be much displeased with James and John.
>the romans took peter and figureheaded him in the wrong way,.
According to who? 2000 years of history proves you wrong.
more like c u gay