Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:45 p.m. No.3360   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3420 >>3464 >>3698 >>4105

 

FBI Agents’ Misconduct Won’t Be Considered in Whitmer Kidnap Case, Judge Rules

 

The misconduct of three FBI agents who investigated the alleged Michigan governor kidnapping plot won’t be used as evidence in court, a U.S. district judge has ruled.

 

With their March 8 trial fast approaching, defendants Adam Fox, Barry Croft, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, and Brandon Caserta filed numerous motions in recent weeks to buttress their argument that the FBI entrapped them in a scheme to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. But the defendants faced a severe blow to their case when U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker made a Feb. 2 order largely siding with government.

 

One of the defendants’ strategies was to bring to the jury’s attention the misconduct of the FBI agents who investigated them. One FBI agent in the Whitmer case was fired from the bureau after beating his wife, another agent has been accused of perjury in a separate case, and a third was pulled from testifying in the trial after it was revealed that he was operating a private intelligence business while investigating the defendants.

 

Judge Jonker said an FBI agent assaulting his wife was irrelevant to the kidnapping case. He made a similar statement about the agent accused of perjury in another matter.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-agents-misconduct-wont-be-considered-in-whitmer-kidnap-case-judge-rules_4256774.html

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:47 p.m. No.3361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3363 >>3370 >>3371

DO NOT FILL OUT THE REFUND FORM - ORGANIZE A MASS CHARGEBACK

 

DO NOT FILL OUT THE REFUND FORM - ORGANIZE A MASS CHARGEBACK

DO NOT FILL OUT THE REFUND FORM - ORGANIZE A MASS CHARGEBACK

DO NOT FILL OUT THE REFUND FORM - ORGANIZE A MASS CHARGEBACK

DO NOT FILL OUT THE REFUND FORM - ORGANIZE A MASS CHARGEBACK

 

>The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

>Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

>The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

>Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

>The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

>Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

The donors should dispute all charges with their credit card companies for services not rendered. The charge was authorized to go to a specific party.

Once disputes reach a certain threshold the payment gateways will pull their services from GoFundMe automatically.

 

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/359711849

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:51 p.m. No.3362   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3420 >>3464 >>3698 >>4105

State Department Releases Damning Emails Revealing Hunter’s Dirty Business ‘Undercut’ US Efforts To Fight Corruption In Ukraine

 

Biden’s seemingly corrupt, derelict son Hunter was harming US efforts to fight corruption in Ukraine but he was making money.

 

A recently declassified email out of the State Department stated that Hunter Biden’s business with Burisma “undercut” US efforts in Ukraine. Just the News reported about this new level of Biden corruption.

 

It has been hidden from the public for five years as Democrats insisted Hunter had no impact on US anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine.

 

This isn’t new but what is new is more proof which will be met with complete disinterest by the media.

 

Former embassy official George Kent, an impeachment witness against Donald Trump, sent an email obtained by Just the News on Nov. 22, 2016 to another impeachment witness, then-U.S. Ambassador to Kiev Marie Yovanovitch. It had the lowest level of classification at ‘confidential’ but was kept hidden.

 

It shows Hunter’s dealings did interfere with US efforts.

 

“The real issue to my mind was that someone in Washington needed to engage VP Biden quietly and say that his son Hunter’s presence on the Burisma board undercut the anti-corruption message the VP and we were advancing in Ukraine,” Kent wrote multiple high-ranking officials in the State Department in Washington.

 

There was intense pressure by Burisma advocates to rehab Burisma’s reputation at the time.

 

Kent even relayed to higher-ups that he had confirmed with Ukrainian prosecutors that Burisma officials had paid a $7 million “bribe” to make one of the cases against the company disappear. The bribe was allegedly paid at a time when Hunter Biden was serving on the Burisma board, a job that landed his firm more than $3 million from the Ukrainian energy company.

 

Kent explained to the officials in Washington that Burisma’s long reputation for alleged corruption and anecdotes like the bribe were one of the main reasons Hunter Biden’s affiliation with the company proved harmful to U.S. efforts to fight Ukrainian corruption.

 

“Ukrainians heard one message from us,” Kent wrote, “and then saw another set of behavior, with the [BIden] family association with a known corrupt figure whose company was known for not playing by the rules in the oil/gas sector.”

 

The email chain also showed that State officials were acutely aware that Hunter Biden had an affiliation with an American business partner also accused — and eventually convicted of — corruption.

 

“I should note that there were two American members of the Burisma board: Hunter Biden and Devon Archer,” another State official on the email chain wrote Kent and Andrews. “Archer was recently indicted in a federal fraud case.”

 

https://en-volve.com/2022/02/04/state-department-releases-damning-emails-revealing-hunters-dirty-business-undercut-us-efforts-to-fight-corruption-in-ukraine/

 

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-02/KentBurismaEmailNov222016.pdf

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 7, 2022, 7:10 p.m. No.3944   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cnns-collapse-now-complete

 

CNN's Collapse Is Now Complete

 

It all began 42 years ago — Ted Turner's creation of a 24/7 news network that would exist on something called cable TV. Few believed it could succeed.

 

And, for its first decade, CNN largely chugged along but wasn't seen as a game-changer or ​a true competitor to big broadcast news entities based in New York in the form of CBS, NBC and ABC. That all changed when war broke out between the United States and Iraq in 1991.

 

On the night war exploded over Baghdad, CNN was the only news organization that was able to broadcast from the city under siege as the U.S. onslaught began, all courtesy of the CNN team’s ability to convince the Iraqi government to grant them a line out of the city to broadcast​, one that the competition could not secure.

 

"How CNN Won the War" was the glowing headline from the Washington Post on a story that perfectly chronicled the events that led to CNN officially becoming a major player. And off it went.

 

Until 2002, CNN was ​No. 1 in the cable news race. But competition that hadn't existed before ended its dominance forever, primarily in the form of Fox News and, to a lesser extent, MSNBC. Despite the ratings results, CNN continued to carry itself as a credible, facts-first network of integrity that leaned heavily on solid reporting with a sprinkling of opinion and infotainment mixed in via programs such as "Larry King Live" and "Crossfire."

 

In 2013, the network hired former NBC Universal president Jeff Zucker to take the reins as ratings continued to be below average at best. This gave Zucker a mandate to radically change the network from its journalistic roots of more than three decades — the months-long wall-to-wall coverage of a missing Malaysian airliner being an early example.

 

But two years later, the move to insert heavy doses of partisan opinion into its news reports only accelerated when Donald Trump – a Zucker hire at NBC for "The Apprentice" – jumped in to the 2016 presidential race. At first, CNN bear-hugged Trump's every move. (Hillary Clinton's giving a speech somewhere? Screw it. Let's show an empty Trump podium with chyrons stating "Trump to speak soon" instead.) The real estate mogul's 17 Republican challengers never had a shot; Trump blotted out the sun in terms of media coverage ​on his way to winning the nomination.

 

At that point, Zucker and CNN began to worry. Because while it was a ratings boon for the network to make Trump the centerpiece, there was growing concern that the guy could actually beat Hillary and become the nation's 45th president. So Zucker unleashed the hounds, but it was too late. Trump would go on to shock the world in November 2016.

 

Undeterred, CNN decided there would be no honeymoon period for the new president. Talk ​about Russian collusion handing Trump the White House began even before the inauguration. And after the nonstop Trump-bashing, Harvard University concluded that CNN led the way, along with Zucker's former home of NBC, in giving Trump 93 percent negative coverage in his first 100 days.

 

For the next four years, CNN served as the leading media resistance to Trump, throwing objectivity out the window. And after Joe Biden got elected, the network cheered the new president as it had throughout the entire campaign while still making Trump a prime centerpiece for over-the-top negative coverage despite ​his being out of office.

 

But as much as CNN tried to resurrect its lead character – who was banned from social media and largely off the grid for the year – his absence ​clearly showed the network was a one-trick partisan pony. Ratings fell 90 percent overall when comparing Jan​uary 2021 to Jan​uary 2022. That’s hard to do.

 

Which brings us to the events of this week: Zucker released a statement saying he had to resign because of a consensual affair with a female executive named Allison Gollust. WarnerMedia apparently has a rule against this, so Zucker – instead of a slap on the wrist for a benign offense – simply had to go abruptly.

 

Nobody believed this excuse. Turns out they may have had plenty of reason to be skeptical.

 

Per several reports, Zucker and Gollust allegedly advised then Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) – the older brother of then-​CNN anchor Chris Cuomo – on what to say during his COVID-19 daily briefings in the spring of 2020. They also reportedly told Cuomo how to respond to and how to criticize then-President Trump, to make it more compelling TV. (Gollust is a former communications director for Andrew Cuomo.)

 

Let's unpack all of this:

 

In the spring of 2020, the country was in a horrific place. Businesses shut completely; people were scared. There were no COVID therapeutics, no vaccines. Hospitals ​were overwhelmed, thousands were dying ​each day. If ​ever there was a time for news organizations to educate and inform the public, this was it.

 

Instead, Zucker apparently believed it was the perfect time to exploit the situation for political gain and to help the network's ratings.

 

Andrew Cuomo benefitted from briefings that made him​ appear to be the adult in the room ​regarding COVID and Trump ​appear to be the villain. ​Cuomo got a $5.1 million book deal as a result.

 

Chris Cuomo and Zucker/Gollust/CNN benefitted from marathon interviews with ​Cuomo's governor/brother, which didn't touch the governor's alleged nursing home scandal. Ratings soared.

 

So, was Zucker's departure ​simply about a consensual relationship with a co-worker? One might be forgiven for questioning that.

 

Moving forward, what's next for CNN when the company falls under the Discovery Channel umbrella later this year? Let's hear from its soon-to-be largest shareholder, John Malone of Liberty Media.

 

"I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing," Malone said in an interview that recently aired on CNBC.

 

The collapse of CNN is now complete: Nine-out-of-ten viewers, gone. Its top-rated anchor, ​Chris Cuomo, gone. Its network president, gone. Its integrity in shambles.

 

​Oh, and new management coming in that is signaling big-time changes … changes that may bring CNN back to the proud network it once was before Jeff Zucker destroyed it.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 4:06 p.m. No.3989   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2022/02/08/mcconnell-blasts-rnc-over-censure-of-cheney-and-kinzinger/?sh=b6cfe3d6ff83

 

McConnell Blasts RNC Over Censure Of Cheney And Kinzinger

 

Topline

 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Tuesday the Republican National Committee should not have censured Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) for serving on the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and disputed its characterization of the riot as “legitimate political discourse.”

 

Key Facts

 

McConnell said at a press briefing that it is "not the job of the RNC" to single out Republicans who hold views that aren't mainstream in the party.

 

The vast majority of the 168 RNC members voted to censure Cheney and Kinzinger at the organization’s winter meeting last week in Salt Lake City, after GOP officials dropped an earlier effort to expel them from the House Republican conference.

 

McConnell also took issue with the RNC’s assertion in its censure resolution that the January 6 attack was "legitimate political discourse," with the senator calling it a “violent insurrection.”

Crucial Quote

 

"It was a violent insurrection for the purpose of trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after a legitimately certified election," McConnell said.

Key Background

 

Cheney and Kinzinger are the only two Republicans on the committee investigating the January 6 attack, and they have faced immense political blowback for voting to impeach former President Donald Trump and accusing him of fomenting the violence on January 6. Cheney last year was stripped from her role as head of the House Republican Conference, while Kinzinger announced he will not seek reelection, in part because he said lies from top political figures are turning the U.S. into a "poisoned country." McConnell was not among the seven Republicans who voted to find Trump guilty of inciting insurrection in his Senate impeachment trial, but he has broken with Republicans by largely shying away from criticizing the investigation into the January 6 attack and repeatedly saying the 2020 presidential election was legitimate. His stance has brought repeated attacks from Trump, who's taken to calling him "the Old Broken-Down Crow" in statements.

Tangent

 

Former Vice President Mike Pence said last week he had "no right to overturn" the 2020 presidential election results when the Electoral College votes were counted on January 6, 2021, despite Trump and his supporters repeatedly claiming he did have that power. “Frankly, there is almost no idea more un-American than the notion that any one person could choose the American president,” Pence said in a speech to the Federalist Society on Friday.

Further Reading

 

RNC Censures Reps. Liz Cheney And Adam Kinzinger For Serving On Jan. 6 Committee (Forbes)

 

Anti-Trump Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger Won’t Seek Reelection (Forbes)

 

Mitch McConnell is suddenly legitimizing the Jan. 6 committee. But why? (Washington Post)

 

Pence Says He ‘Had No Right To Overturn The Election’—And Trump Is ‘Wrong’ To Claim He Did (Forbes)

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 4:09 p.m. No.3990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/pfizer-quietly-adds-language-warning-unfavorable-pre-clinical-clinical-or-safety-data-may

 

Pfizer Quietly Adds Language Warning That 'Unfavorable Pre-Clinical, Clinical Or Safety Data' May Impact Business

by Tyler Durden

 

Two weeks ago, the FDA begged a Texas judge to delay production on the first monthly batch of 55,000 pages of Covid-19 vaccine data submitted to the agency by Pfizer. Originally, the agency was set to produce just 500 pages-per-month.

 

Now, Pfizer - which just forecast $54 billion in Covid-related sales in 2022, appears to be anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Q4 earnings releases.

 

As Rubicon Capital's Kelly Brown notes on Twitter, the changes center around disclosures of unfavorable safety data.

 

For example, in Q4 they added: "or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection."

 

More from Brown, who notes that Pfizer is now highlighting "concerns about clinical data integrity…"

 

(2/3)

"…challenges related to public confidence or awareness of our COVID-19 vaccine or Paxlovid, including challenges driven by misinformation, access, CONCERNS ABOUT CLINICAL DATA INTEGRITY and prescriber and pharmacy education;"

 

(all-caps are mine) pic.twitter.com/bAKH4iqiKs

— Kelly Brown (@rubiconcapital_) February 8, 2022

 

The company also notes that Covid-19 may "diminish in severity or prevalence, or disappear entirely."

 

— Kelly Brown (@rubiconcapital_) February 8, 2022

 

What's behind the curtain, Pfizer?

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 4:09 p.m. No.3991   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-should-end-strategic-ambiguity-on-taiwan-rep-luria_4264547.html

 

US Should End Strategic Ambiguity on Taiwan: Rep. Luria

 

The United States Congress should hold a debate on the possibility of formally announcing military support for Taiwan in the event it is invaded by the Chinese regime, according to Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.)

 

Luria said that ending the United States’ policy of so-called strategic ambiguity, wherein the nation neither openly confirms nor denies it will militarily defend Taiwan, was vital to deterring a Chinese invasion of the island.

 

“I think that our current policy of strategic ambiguity is, it’s time to change that,” Luria said. “I think that we need to provide strategic clarity. We need to be very clear and unambiguous and say that the United States will react in order to maintain the status quo.”

 

Luria made the comments during a recent webinar of U.S. seapower hosted by Washington-based think tank Hudson Institute,

 

Luria is the vice-chair of the House Armed Services Committee and served as a commander in the U.S. Navy. She said that providing strategic clarity, formally saying the United States will or will not defend Taiwan from invasion, was necessary to address the urgency of the situation in the Indo-Pacific.

 

Such a declaration, she said, would also require the United States to position its forces in the region and direct its allies in facilitating the defense of the island—something Luria believes is impossible with the current state of legal and political affairs.

 

“With our current presence, with our current legal and political statements of ambiguity, I think the Chinese see this as a very clear window where they can act and they’re building a fleet to do that,” Luria said.

President Has ‘No Authority’ to Defend Taiwan

 

Luria said that a key reason Congress needed to convene on the issue of defending Taiwan was that the president does not actually have authority to declare war on China in the event it does invade.

 

“The president essentially has no authority to react right now in order to defend Taiwan,” Luria said.

 

She explained that, although the Taiwan Relations Act contains provisions allowing the United States to furnish Taiwan with military technologies with which it can defend itself, it does not include any mutual security agreements.

 

Relatedly, the War Powers Act bars the president from deploying forces where hostilities are likely to occur unless consent is given by Congress.

 

This means, in effect, that if the Chinese regime were to invade Taiwan tomorrow, President Joe Biden would have no legal authority to order a military intervention to stop it until Congress voted on the issue.

 

“We as Congress have a role,” Luria said. “We need to have a debate and we need to be very clear and unambiguous. I think that we should say that we will come to the defense of Taiwan in order to maintain the status quo.”

 

Such an effort, Luria said, would ensure that the president has the authority he needs when he needs it, and would also do more to deter Beijing from invading in the first place.

 

To that end, she said that she would like to see the president make a similar commitment to that made by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, who oversaw the development of a 600-ship Navy following a reduction of forces in the wake of the Vietnam War.

US Needs a More Effective Deterrence

 

Luria’s remarks come nearly a year after then-Adm. Phil Davidson said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would be ready to invade Taiwan in six years, and amid increasing warnings that Beijing is truncating its timeline for just such an invasion.

 

Luria said that the “Davidson window” of invasion by 2027 was confirmed by an academic who advised CCP leader Xi Jinping as being under consideration by the regime’s military.

 

Meanwhile, increasing demands have depleted the U.S. Navy’s fleet readiness, and tight budgets for new ship development continue to constrain the Navy’s ability to build next-generation vessels required for great power competition.

 

Luria said that the state of affairs was owed in part to a lack of cohesive strategy concerning how to integrate maritime forces with broader U.S. goals.

 

“I’ve been clear that I feel there is a lack of a maritime strategy,” Luria said. “I think it’s very important to understand what the strategy is. Where do we need our forces? What type of forces do we need? We’ve gone years without a 30-year shipbuilding plan.”

 

“The truth is that you have to actually have the deterrence,” Luria said. “You have to have the forces.”

 

To that end, the United States’ naval forces total under 300 vessels. The Chinese regime’s, meanwhile, number over 360.

 

The numerical discrepancy is more severe when one considers the strategic situation of the Indo-Pacific. The United States has only about 60 ships in the region. The entirety of the CCP’s maritime militia is located near China’s shores, however, which could bring the effective number of Chinese maritime forces to more than 600.

 

To help mitigate the current poverty of maritime strategy, Luria recommended that the lead commander in the Pacific, Adm. John Aquilino, directly and regularly advise the president on the matter.

 

“This is our number one defense issue,” Luria said. “The sense of urgency that you get from the commander in the theater … the level of urgency, concern, and investment in this, we could clearly see that go up.”

 

To that end, Luria urged people to consider the ramifications of a world in which the United States did not commit to the defense of Taiwan.

 

“If you think about what happens if China invaded Taiwan, what follows from that?” Luria said. “I think that that’s not acceptable to any Americans or any of our allies.”

 

“There’s really a bigger question,” Luria said. “The bigger question is: What is our role in deterrence? In the sense of, is the United States going to react?”

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 4:11 p.m. No.3992   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/08/1079205081/house-passes-stopgap-bill-to-avoid-government-shutdown

 

House passes stopgap bill to avoid government shutdown

 

The House of Representatives has passed a stopgap bill to avoid a government shutdown and buy Congress more time to strike a deal to fund the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

 

The House approved the continuing resolution, 272-162, to fund the government through March 11.

 

House Appropriations Chair Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., who introduced the bill on Monday, described it as a mechanism to keep the government "up and running while Congress completes our important work."

 

Congress now has an extra three weeks to finalize negotiations on an omnibus package for fiscal year 2022.

 

"The continuing resolution passed by the House today reflects our Majority's determination to ensure that the work of government is not disrupted by a shutdown," House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said in a statement after the vote. "We cannot, however, simply allow the government to operate under last year's funding levels for the remainder of the 2022 Fiscal Year."

 

Hoyer had expressed some frustration over the weekend that it was taking so long to come to agreement on the budget bills.

 

"We should have passed all 12 appropriation bills to fund the government for this coming fiscal year that we're now in — fiscal year '22 — we should have passed that by Sept. 30," he said on MSNBC. "We didn't. As a result, we needed to CR…and we're now doing an additional one, because we haven't gotten our work done on time."

 

But he signaled optimism that an overall budget deal is within reach before this next resolution expires.

 

"I think that we're going to get agreement both on the topline — how much spending is going to be and how it will be spent — but it's not there yet," he added.

 

The resolution heads to the Senate, where Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the chamber will act on this latest temporary government funding measure before the last one runs out on February 18.

 

"While negotiations on a full-year funding agreement continue, we will in the meantime avoid a pointless and costly government shutdown," Schumer said on the Senate floor on Tuesday. "This CR provides a little more time to reach a deal for a spending package. It is the responsible and prudent path forward that eliminates the risk of a shutdown."

 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said passing the temporary funding measure is "an obvious, commonsense step."

 

But he also highlighted three issues important to the GOP. The first is parity for defense spending — meaning equal percentage increases in defense and nondefense spending. Democrats are pushing for a larger increase in the latter. Republicans also want to keep in longstanding policy riders, such as the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding ban on federal funding for most abortions, as well as ensure "partisan poisons pills" are kept out of the deal.

 

This is the third time Congress has passed a short-term spending bill to keep the federal government running since the fiscal year began in October.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:38 p.m. No.3994   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/08/johnson-johnson-plant-pauses-covid-vaccine-production-report-says.html

 

Johnson & Johnson plant pauses Covid vaccine production, report says

Kevin Breuninger

3 minutes

 

Syringes and a box of Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

 

Paul Hennessy | SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images

 

The only Johnson & Johnson facility currently making usable batches of the company's single-shot coronavirus vaccine has temporarily halted its production, a new report said Tuesday.

 

The Netherlands-based plant has instead focused on making a different, possibly more profitable vaccine aimed at a different virus, The New York Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

 

The pause in production at the Leiden facility, which began late last year, could reduce the supply of J&J's Covid vaccine by hundreds of millions of doses, one of those people told the Times.

 

It is unclear whether vaccine supplies have been been affected by the company's move, according to the report. J&J is preparing to have the Leiden plant restart Covid vaccine production in March, the Times reported.

 

J&J spokesman Jake Sargent didn't directly comment on the Times' article. He told CNBC in a statement the company is "focused on ensuring our vaccine is available where people are in need," and that it is fulfilling its obligations to the international groups trying to boost access to the Covid vaccine.

 

J&J is continuing to deliver batches of the vaccine materials to sites that bottle and package doses, and "we currently have millions of doses of our Covid-19 vaccine in inventory," Sargent said.

 

"We are proud of the work of our many industry partners and the collaborations we have developed to produce our Covid-19 vaccine," he said.

 

Polls show that many Americans have taken a skeptical eye toward the J&J Covid vaccine, which is the only one approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that requires just a single shot as a primary dose, versus the two-dose regimen of vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna.

 

The FDA last year recommended pausing the use of the J&J vaccine following a small number of reports of recipients developing rare blood clots. It was also found to be less effective against the deadly delta variant that emerged last year.

 

But several studies have shown the shot remains effective at preventing hospitalization and death from Covid, and a booster dose has been shown to be effective in protecting against severe illness from the highly transmissible omicron variant.

 

The J&J vaccine is also easier to transport and distribute, owing to the fact that it requires just one dose and can be stored without a freezer, providing protection for people who may otherwise be unable to get fully vaccinated.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:39 p.m. No.3995   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/08/1079339405/west-virginia-ban-nuclear-power-coal

 

Coal-dependent West Virginia eliminates ban on nuclear power

 

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice on Tuesday signed a bill eliminating the state's ban on nuclear power plants but cautioned against jumping in to diversify the coal-dependent state's energy offerings.

 

Justice said in a letter that any development or placement of nuclear technologies in West Virginia "must be done thoughtfully and, above all, safely."

 

The Republican governor said lawmakers must continue to research and monitor nuclear initiatives "to ensure appropriate regulatory or safety measures are in place as new technologies are developed and implemented."

 

Justice called the bill "a positive step" in modernizing the state's regulatory environment, but said "we must work to ensure only positive outcomes from this legislation by continually evaluating any concerns and implementing best practices in any regulation that may be required."

 

The state's ban on nuclear plants was enacted in 1996, but nuclear power has in recent years gained support as a tool to keep climate change under control, with proponents noting that it emits few planet-damaging emissions and is safer on average than nearly any other energy source.

 

West Virginia is the nation's second-largest coal producer, behind Wyoming, and accounted for 5% of the nation's total energy production in 2019, ranking fifth among the states, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

 

But West Virginia has lost thousands of coal jobs in the past decade as companies and utilities explore using other energy sources such as natural gas, solar and wind.

 

According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, coal provides 88% of West Virginia's energy needs, followed by 5% from natural gas, 3.3% from wind, 3.1% from hydroelectric and 0.2% from other energy sources.

 

There are nuclear power plants in 28 states, although Georgia is the only state with a nuclear project currently under construction. Among surrounding states, there are a combined 8,500 nuclear energy jobs in Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia, according to the NEI.

 

Some states are transitioning away from carbon dioxide-emitting fossil fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stave off the worst effects of a warming planet.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:40 p.m. No.3996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

Peter Thiel Leaving Facebook Parent Meta; Biggest Chip Deal in History Has Collapsed | NTD Business

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/peter-thiel-leaving-facebook-parent-meta-biggest-chip-deal-in-history-has-collapsed-ntd-business_4263372.html

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:41 p.m. No.3997   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-should-end-strategic-ambiguity-on-taiwan-rep-luria_4264547.html

 

US Should End Strategic Ambiguity on Taiwan: Rep. Luria

 

The United States Congress should hold a debate on the possibility of formally announcing military support for Taiwan in the event it is invaded by the Chinese regime, according to Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.)

 

Luria said that ending the United States’ policy of so-called strategic ambiguity, wherein the nation neither openly confirms nor denies it will militarily defend Taiwan, was vital to deterring a Chinese invasion of the island.

 

“I think that our current policy of strategic ambiguity is, it’s time to change that,” Luria said. “I think that we need to provide strategic clarity. We need to be very clear and unambiguous and say that the United States will react in order to maintain the status quo.”

 

Luria made the comments during a recent webinar of U.S. seapower hosted by Washington-based think tank Hudson Institute,

 

Luria is the vice-chair of the House Armed Services Committee and served as a commander in the U.S. Navy. She said that providing strategic clarity, formally saying the United States will or will not defend Taiwan from invasion, was necessary to address the urgency of the situation in the Indo-Pacific.

 

Such a declaration, she said, would also require the United States to position its forces in the region and direct its allies in facilitating the defense of the island—something Luria believes is impossible with the current state of legal and political affairs.

 

“With our current presence, with our current legal and political statements of ambiguity, I think the Chinese see this as a very clear window where they can act and they’re building a fleet to do that,” Luria said.

President Has ‘No Authority’ to Defend Taiwan

 

Luria said that a key reason Congress needed to convene on the issue of defending Taiwan was that the president does not actually have authority to declare war on China in the event it does invade.

 

“The president essentially has no authority to react right now in order to defend Taiwan,” Luria said.

 

She explained that, although the Taiwan Relations Act contains provisions allowing the United States to furnish Taiwan with military technologies with which it can defend itself, it does not include any mutual security agreements.

 

Relatedly, the War Powers Act bars the president from deploying forces where hostilities are likely to occur unless consent is given by Congress.

 

This means, in effect, that if the Chinese regime were to invade Taiwan tomorrow, President Joe Biden would have no legal authority to order a military intervention to stop it until Congress voted on the issue.

 

“We as Congress have a role,” Luria said. “We need to have a debate and we need to be very clear and unambiguous. I think that we should say that we will come to the defense of Taiwan in order to maintain the status quo.”

 

Such an effort, Luria said, would ensure that the president has the authority he needs when he needs it, and would also do more to deter Beijing from invading in the first place.

 

To that end, she said that she would like to see the president make a similar commitment to that made by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, who oversaw the development of a 600-ship Navy following a reduction of forces in the wake of the Vietnam War.

US Needs a More Effective Deterrence

 

Luria’s remarks come nearly a year after then-Adm. Phil Davidson said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would be ready to invade Taiwan in six years, and amid increasing warnings that Beijing is truncating its timeline for just such an invasion.

 

Luria said that the “Davidson window” of invasion by 2027 was confirmed by an academic who advised CCP leader Xi Jinping as being under consideration by the regime’s military.

 

Meanwhile, increasing demands have depleted the U.S. Navy’s fleet readiness, and tight budgets for new ship development continue to constrain the Navy’s ability to build next-generation vessels required for great power competition.

 

Luria said that the state of affairs was owed in part to a lack of cohesive strategy concerning how to integrate maritime forces with broader U.S. goals.

 

“I’ve been clear that I feel there is a lack of a maritime strategy,” Luria said. “I think it’s very important to understand what the strategy is. Where do we need our forces? What type of forces do we need? We’ve gone years without a 30-year shipbuilding plan.”

 

“The truth is that you have to actually have the deterrence,” Luria said. “You have to have the forces.”

 

To that end, the United States’ naval forces total under 300 vessels. The Chinese regime’s, meanwhile, number over 360.

 

The numerical discrepancy is more severe when one considers the strategic situation of the Indo-Pacific. The United States has only about 60 ships in the region. The entirety of the CCP’s maritime militia is located near China’s shores, however, which could bring the effective number of Chinese maritime forces to more than 600.

 

To help mitigate the current poverty of maritime strategy, Luria recommended that the lead commander in the Pacific, Adm. John Aquilino, directly and regularly advise the president on the matter.

 

“This is our number one defense issue,” Luria said. “The sense of urgency that you get from the commander in the theater … the level of urgency, concern, and investment in this, we could clearly see that go up.”

 

To that end, Luria urged people to consider the ramifications of a world in which the United States did not commit to the defense of Taiwan.

 

“If you think about what happens if China invaded Taiwan, what follows from that?” Luria said. “I think that that’s not acceptable to any Americans or any of our allies.”

 

“There’s really a bigger question,” Luria said. “The bigger question is: What is our role in deterrence? In the sense of, is the United States going to react?”

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:43 p.m. No.3998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4004 >>4016 >>4105

https://www.foxnews.com/world/retired-pope-benedict-xvi-asks-for-forgiveness-over-handling-of-clergy-sex-abuse-cases

 

Retired Pope Benedict XVI asks for forgiveness over handling of clergy sex abuse cases, but denies wrongdoing

 

Retired Pope Benedict XVI asked forgiveness Tuesday for any "grievous faults" in his handling of clergy sex abuse cases, but denied any personal or specific wrongdoing after an independent report criticized his actions in four cases while he was archbishop of Munich, Germany.

 

Benedict's lack of a personal apology or admission of guilt immediately riled abuse survivors, who said his response reflected the Catholic hierarchy's "permanent" refusal to accept responsibility for the rape and sodomy of children by priests.

 

Benedict, 94, was responding to a Jan. 20 report from a German law firm that had been commissioned by the German Catholic Church to look into how cases of sexual abuse were handled in the Munich archdiocese between 1945 and 2019. Benedict, the former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, headed the archdiocese from 1977 to 1982.

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI attends a Mass prior to the opening of the Holy Door of St. Peter's Basilica, formally starting the Jubilee of Mercy, at the Vatican on Dec. 8, 2015.

 

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI attends a Mass prior to the opening of the Holy Door of St. Peter's Basilica, formally starting the Jubilee of Mercy, at the Vatican on Dec. 8, 2015. (AP/Gregorio Borgia, File))

 

POPE EMERITUS BENEDICT ATTENDED MEETING WHERE PEDOPHILE PRIEST’S TRANSFER WAS DISCUSSED

 

The report faulted Benedict’s handling of four cases during his time as archbishop, accusing him of misconduct for having failed to restrict the ministry of the four priests even after they had been convicted criminally. The report also faulted his predecessors and successors, estimating there had been at least 497 abuse victims over the decades and at least 235 suspected perpetrators.

 

The Vatican on Tuesday released a letter that Benedict wrote responding to the allegations alongside a more technical reply from his lawyers who had provided an initial 82-page response to the law firm about his nearly five-year tenure in Munich.

 

The conclusion of Benedict’s lawyers was resolute: "As an archbishop, Cardinal Ratzinger was not involved in any cover-up of acts of abuse," they wrote. They criticized the report's authors for misinterpreting their submission, and asserted that the authors provided no evidence that Benedict was aware of the criminal history of any of the four priests in question.

 

Benedict’s response was more nuanced and spiritual, though he went on at length to thank his legal team before even addressing the allegations or the victims of abuse.

 

"I have had great responsibilities in the Catholic Church," the retired pope said in his letter. "All the greater is my pain for the abuses and the errors that occurred in those different places during the time of my mandate."

Pope emeritus Benedict XVI speaks with Pope Francis during a papal mass for elderly people at St Peter's square on Sept. 28, 2014 at the Vatican.

 

Pope emeritus Benedict XVI speaks with Pope Francis during a papal mass for elderly people at St Peter's square on Sept. 28, 2014 at the Vatican. (Photo by TIZIANA FABI/AFP via Getty Images)

 

Benedict issued what he called a "confession," though he didn't confess to any specific sin or fault. He recalled that daily Mass begins with believers confessing their sins and asking forgiveness for their faults and even their "grievous faults." Benedict noted that in his meetings with abuse victims while he was pope, "I have seen at first hand the effects of a most grievous fault."

 

POPE FRANCIS PLEDGES JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF ABUSE AFTER PREDECESSOR FAULTED

 

"I have come to understand that we ourselves are drawn into this grievous fault whenever we neglect it or fail to confront it with the necessary decisiveness and responsibility, as too often happened and continues to happen," he wrote. "As in those meetings, once again I can only express to all the victims of sexual abuse my profound shame, my deep sorrow and my heartfelt request for forgiveness."

 

His response drew swift criticism from Eckiger Tisch, a group representing German clergy abuse survivors, who said it fit into the church's "permanent relativizing on matters of abuse – wrongdoing and mistakes took place, but no one takes concrete responsibility," the group said in a statement.

 

"Joseph Ratzinger can’t bring himself simply to state that he is sorry not to have done more to protect the children entrusted to his church," the group said. "That would be an honest sentence."

 

The response will likely complicate efforts by German bishops re-establishing credibility with the faithful, whose demands for accountability have only increased as the church has come to terms with decades of abuse and cover-up.

 

The head of the German bishops conference, Limburg Bishop Georg Baetzing, had previously said that Benedict needed to respond to the report by distancing himself from his lawyers and advisers. "He must talk, and he must override his advisers and essentially say the simple sentence: ’I incurred guilt, I made mistakes and I apologize to those affected," Baetzing said. "It won’t work any other way."

A relief of Pope Benedict XVI is on display in the Frauenkirche in Munich, Germany.

 

A relief of Pope Benedict XVI is on display in the Frauenkirche in Munich, Germany. (Photo by Sven Hoppe/picture alliance via Getty Images)

 

In a tweet Tuesday, Baetzing noted that Benedict had said he would respond and has now honored that pledge.

 

"I am grateful to him for that and he deserves respect for it," Baetzing wrote. The tweet didn't address the substance of Benedict’s response.

 

POPE FRANCIS URGES PARENTS TO ‘NEVER CONDEMN’ THEIR GAY CHILDREN

 

The law firm report identified four cases in which Ratzinger was accused of misconduct in failing to act against abusers.

 

Two cases involved priests who offended while Ratzinger was archbishop and were punished by the German legal system but were kept in pastoral work without any limits on their ministry. A third case involved a cleric who was convicted by a court outside Germany but was put into service in Munich. The fourth case involved a convicted pedophile priest who was allowed to transfer to Munich in 1980, and was later put into ministry. In 1986, that priest received a suspended sentence for molesting a boy.

 

Benedict’s team had earlier clarified an initial "error" in their submission to the law firm that had insisted Ratzinger was not present at the 1980 meeting in which the priest’s transfer to Munich was discussed. Ratzinger was there, but his return to ministry was not discussed, they said.

 

Benedict said he was deeply hurt that the "oversight" about his presence at the 1980 meeting had been used to "cast doubt on my truthfulness, and even to label me a liar." But he said he had been heartened by the letters and gestures of support he had received, including from his successor.

 

"I am particularly grateful for the confidence, support and prayer that Pope Francis personally expressed to me," he said.

 

The Vatican had already strongly defended Benedict’s record in the aftermath of the law firm report, recalling that Benedict was the first pope to meet with victims of abuse, that he had issued strong norms to punish priests who raped children and had directed the church to pursue a path of humility in seeking forgiveness for the crimes of its clerics.

 

The Vatican’s defense, however, focused primarily on Benedict’s tenure as head of the Holy See’s doctrine office and his eight-year papacy.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:48 p.m. No.4001   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60220702

 

Ukraine tensions: US trying to draw Russia into war, Putin says

 

Russia's President Vladimir Putin has accused the US of trying to draw his country into a war in Ukraine.

 

He said America's goal was to use a confrontation as a pretext to impose more sanctions on Russia.

 

Mr Putin also said the US was ignoring Russia's concerns about the expansion of Nato, the Western military alliance which Ukraine is seeking to join.

 

The US and its allies accuse Russia of planning to invade Ukraine, something Russia has repeatedly denied.

 

On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken tweeted that the US was "committed to preventing a conflict that is in no one's interest".

 

Meanwhile, Spanish newspaper El Pais has released what it says are confidential documents the US and Nato sent to Russia last week - including offers of talks on cutting back on nuclear weaponry and trust-building measures in exchange for reducing tensions over Ukraine.

 

A Nato official told the BBC the alliance never comments on alleged leaks. President Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was aware of the report, but that they did not publish it and did not want to comment on it, according to AFP news agency.

 

In recent weeks Russia has moved about 100,000 troops - equipped with everything from tanks and artillery to ammunition and air power - to Ukraine's border.

 

It comes eight years after the country annexed Ukraine's southern Crimea peninsula and backed a bloody rebellion in the eastern Donbas region.

 

Moscow in turn accuses the Ukrainian government of failing to implement an international deal to restore peace to the east, where at least 14,000 people have been killed and Russian-backed rebels control swathes of territory.

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky however warned on Tuesday that a Russian invasion would "not be a war between Ukraine and Russia - this would be a war in Europe, a full-scale one".

 

Speaking after talks with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in Moscow, Mr Putin said: "It seems to me that the United States is not so much concerned about the security of Ukraine… but its main task is to contain Russia's development. In this sense Ukraine itself is just a tool to reach this goal."

 

Rivalry between Russia and the US, which still possess the world's biggest nuclear arsenals, dates back to the Cold War (1947-89). Ukraine was then a crucial part of the communist Soviet Union, second only to Russia.

 

Mr Putin said the US had ignored Moscow's concerns in its response to Russian demands for legally binding security guarantees, including a block on the Nato alliance's further expansion to the east.

 

He suggested that if Ukraine were granted its wish to join Nato, it could drag the other members into a war with Russia.

 

"Imagine that Ukraine is a Nato member and a military operation [to regain Crimea] begins," the Russian leader said. "What - are we going to fight with Nato? Has anyone thought about this? It seems like they haven't."

 

The US meanwhile insists it is fully committed to dialogue. Speaking after a call with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Tuesday, Mr Blinken said he had emphasised US willingness to continue discussing "mutual security concerns".

 

Earlier this week, the US said it had received a written response from Russia to a US proposal aimed at de-escalating the crisis in Ukraine. But hours later Russia's deputy foreign minister said that was not true and a source told Ria news agency it was still preparing a response.

 

According to the documents published by El Pais, the US proposal suggested "reciprocal commitments by both the United States and Russia to refrain from deploying offensive ground-launched missile systems and permanent forces with a combat mission in the territory of Ukraine".

 

It included a pledge to hold talks about reducing nuclear weaponry and missile launchers, on condition that Russia reduces its threat to Ukraine.

 

The US also suggested a "transparency mechanism" to address Russia's concerns about US missiles in Europe. The US proposed a way for Russia to confirm there are no cruise missiles at Nato bases in Romania and Bulgaria, in exchange for the US doing the same at two Russian bases of its choice.

 

The documents said the US would discuss all issues that affect European security with its allies.

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 5:51 p.m. No.4002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4003 >>4105

https://www.theepochtimes.com/doug-emhoff-husband-of-kamala-harris-evacuated-from-dc-school-officials_4265264.html

 

Doug Emhoff, Husband of Kamala Harris, Evacuated From DC School: Officials

 

Vice President Kamala Harris’s husband, Doug Emhoff, was evacuated from a school after a bomb threat, according to a spokesperson.

 

Reporters who were on the scene said that Secret Service agents approached Emhoff, who was at Dunbar High School for an event in commemoration of Black History Month in Washington, and told him “we have to go.” An Associated Press reporter said Emhoff was taken away from the building and into his motorcade. Photos captured by the AP show him being grabbed by the arm and being moved by an agent.

 

District of Columbia Public Schools spokesman Enrique Gutierrez told the outlet that there was a bomb threat at the school. It’s not clear if it was connected to Emhoff’s visit.

 

“U.S. Secret Service was made aware of a security threat at a school where the @SecondGentleman was meeting with students and faculty,” Emhoff spokesperson Katie Peters wrote in a Twitter post, referring to the honorific used to describe Emhoff. “Mr. Emhoff is safe and the school has been evacuated. We are grateful to Secret Service and D.C. Police for their work.”

 

Earlier, Peters said the school told the Secret Service about the alleged threat, which was described as a “security incident or a report of a potential security incident.”

 

Emhoff’s wife, Harris, was not with him during the incident.

 

The Secret Service has not immediately responded to a request for comment.

 

Enrique Gutierrez, the press secretary for Washington D.C.’s public school system, told ABC News that “it was an apparent bomb threat,” and “we’re taking precautions, evacuation … evacuating everybody. Seems like all the students are out and safe.”

 

Kristen Metzger, a D.C. police spokeswoman, told The Washington Post that police were informed of the bomb threat at around 2:30 p.m. ET. No item or device was found as of 3 p.m., she said.

 

Students at the school were sent home, according to the Post. Teachers remained on the football field as of 3:45 p.m. ET as police dogs searched the premises.

 

“Our protocol is to clear the building and move the kids away,” Dunbar Principal Nadine Smith told reporters. “[The District of Columbia Public Schools] just gave us directions to make sure, to go ahead and send the kids home.”

 

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that she had no updates on the situation involving Emhoff.

 

Earlier, Emhoff’s sent out a news release that he would visit the school “to meet with students who are participating in a program that helps them relate to history on a personal level.”

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 6:02 p.m. No.4005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4006

WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY

 

2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

 

3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. (Karl Rothschild acted as "peacemaker" between the Vatican and her enemies, loaning the Vatican five million pounds in a period of difficulty. Gregory XVI conferred a Papal decoration on Kalman Rothschild since when Rothschilds have been "Guardians of the Vatican Treasury").

 

4. THE KING OF THE JEWS WILL BE THE REAL POPE OF THE UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH

 

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

 

6. In general, then, our contemporary press will continue to CONVICT State affairs, religions, incapacities of the GOYIM, always using the most unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practiced by the genius of our gifted tribe . . . (Calling the Jim Jones massacre in Guyana a mass suicide, not a C.I.A./MK-ULTRA/U.S. Government massacre? Denying the massacre of the Branch Dravidian sect at Waco, Texas, was a needless and deliberate massacre by the B.A.T.F./F.B.I/C.I.A/U.S. Government).

 

7. Our kingdom will be an apologia of the divinity Vishnu, in whom is found its personification - in our hundred hands will be, one in each, the springs of the machinery of social life. We shall see everything without the aid of official police which, in that scope of its rights which we elaborated for the use of the GOYIM, hinders governments from seeing. In our programs ONE-THIRD OF OUR SUBJECTS WILL KEEP THE REST UNDER OBSERVATION from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the State. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy and informer, but a merit: unfounded denunciations, however, will be cruelly punished that there may be no development of abuses of this right.

 

8. Our agents will be taken from the higher as well as the lower ranks of society, from among the administrative class who spend their time in amusements, editors, printers and publishers, booksellers, clerks, and salesmen, workmen, coachmen, lackeys, et cetera. This body, having no rights and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report: verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any person not denouncing anything seen or heard concerning questions of polity will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment, if it be proved that he is guilty of this crime.

 

9. JUST AS NOWADAYS OUR BRETHREN, ARE OBLIGED AT THEIR OWN RISK TO DENOUNCE TO THE KAHAL APOSTATES OF THEIR OWN FAMILY or members who have been noticed doing anything in opposition to the KAHAL, SO IN OUR KINGDOM OVER ALL THE WORLD IT WILL BE OBLIGATORY FOR ALL OUR SUBJECTS TO OBSERVE THE DUTY OF SERVICE TO THE STATE IN THIS DIRECTION.

 

10. Such an organization will extirpate abuses of authority, of force, of bribery, everything in fact which we by our counsels, by our theories of the superhuman rights of man, have introduced into the customs of the GOYIM …. But how else were we to procure that increase of causes predisposing to disorders in the midst of their administration? …. Among the number of those methods one of the most important is - agents for the restoration of order, so placed as to have the opportunity in their disintegrating activity of developing and displaying their evil inclinations - obstinate self-conceit, irresponsible exercise of authority, and, first and foremost, venality. == (Janet Reno? B.A.T.F.? C.I.A.?)

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 8, 2022, 6:16 p.m. No.4010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/02/08/jury-trial-ordered-for-cnns-don-lemon-over-sexual-assault-allegations-n1557362

 

Jury Trial Ordered for CNN’s Don Lemon Over Sexual Assault Allegations

 

In 2019, CNN’s Don Lemon was accused of sexual assault. After more than two years of delays due to a lengthy discovery process and COVID-19, Lemon will soon be going to court. An order for a jury trial was entered into the court system on Dec. 20, 2021, by a federal judge in New York. Lemon reportedly was opposed to a jury trial and had asked for a bench trial, which would have left his fate up to a judge.

 

According to the lawsuit, which was filed by Dustin Hice in August of 2019 in Suffolk County Court, “[Lemon] put his hand down the front of his own shorts, and vigorously rubbed his genitalia, removed his hand and shoved his index and middle fingers into Plaintiff’s mustache and under Plaintiff’s nose.”

 

The incident is alleged to have occurred in a Hamptons bar in 2018.

 

“Lemon intensely pushed his fingers against Plaintiff’s face under Plaintiff’s nose,” the lawsuit continues, “forcing Plaintiff’s head thrust backward as Defendant repeatedly asked Plaintiff ‘Do you like p—y or d–k?’ While saying this, Mr. Lemon continued to shove his fingers into Plaintiff’s face with aggression and hostility.”

Anonymous ID: 010372 Feb. 9, 2022, 7:45 a.m. No.4036   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

Military Tribunal Convicts Dr. Francis Collins

 

On Monday, January 31, a military tribunal found Dr. Francis Collins guilty of treason and mass medical malpractice, sentencing him to hang by the neck until dead.

 

Rear Adm. Darse E. Crandall described the weeping defendant as a “cowardly creature” who refused to “man up” and take accountability for his “war crimes” against the United States of America and its people.

 

In a brief opening statement, the patriotic admiral said Collins, even when confronted with evidence linking him to Covid crimes, tried to absolve himself of responsibility by pinning the administration’s unconstitutional mask and vaccine mandates, and lockdowns, entirely on his co-conspirator, Dr. Anthony Fauci, even though lengthy email chains proved conclusively that the diabolical duo had collaborated from the start.

 

The three officers weighing the case against Collins spent several hours scrutinizing 150 emails in which Collins and Fauci admitted masks do not mitigate the spread of Covid-19 and that vaccines are more likely to sicken or kill recipients than guard against Covid. Moreover, they ruminated the idea of “eliminating meddlesome interlopers” who opposed vaccine and mask mandates and who advocated for alternative therapies such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. In one email, Collins mentioned “how nice it would be if something tragically awful happened to” Drs. Paul Marik, Pierre Kory, and Peter McCullough, all of whom slammed vaccine mandates in favor of treating mild Covid cases with off-label, inexpensive, readily available pharmaceuticals.

 

“We’re not going to get rich endorsing ivermectin, even if it works. The money is in vaccines. We need to discredit doctors opposed to immunization, discredit them, their families, their friends—whatever it takes,” Collins wrote in an email.

 

A later email exchange took a more ominous turn. “Members of the FLCCC and AFLD should all have accidents. The big guy would really like that. It’s not like anyone would miss them if they vanished. Thoughts? Doesn’t have to be all, just the major ones,” Collins wrote on April 22, 2021.

 

His acronyms referenced the Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and American Front-Line Doctors (AFLD,) a coalition of accredited physicians and medical professionals whose peer-reviewed dissertations on the efficacy of alternative therapies have been maligned by Big Medicine and Big Pharma.

 

“These valiant doctors have fought an uphill battle to prescribe for their patients the best possible medications, in this case ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. But because you, Dr. Collins, disagreed with their treatment programs, you laid the groundwork for plans to have them killed? Now, that’s a hard pill to swallow, but the content of your emails is damning and irrefutable,” Rear Adm. Crandall said to the accused.

 

Collins rose to his feet. “I never said that, never wrote that. I was just blowing off steam, and so was Tony.”

 

“And should we believe you were just blowing off steam when you wrote to Fauci that Senator Rand Paul should be assassinated because he was giving Fauci a bad name?” Rear Adm. Crandall asked, and showed the panel yet another email underscoring Collins and Fauci’s animus toward Senator Paul.

 

“If Paul’s removed from the picture, a lot of our problems go away,” Collins wrote, and to which Fauci replied, “He’s an idiot and causing a lot of damage. We could have him disappeared. We’re protected. We should think on it. No rush or rash decisions.”

 

Rear Adm. Crandall asked the panel to silently review 100 more emails, the contents of which were not disclosed publicly. In the end, the panel found Collins guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, mass medical malpractice, and treason, and suggested he be hanged.

 

A date of execution has been set for February 21.

 

https://realrawnews.com/2022/02/military-tribunal-convicts-dr-francis-collins/