Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 6:55 p.m. No.3737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.jccf.ca/ottawa-police-decree-is-illegal-justice-centre-warns/

 

Ottawa police decree is illegal, Justice Centre warns | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

 

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre today warned that Ottawa police would be breaking the law if police attempt to intimidate or arrest people who bring food or other supplies to truckers who are peacefully exercising their Charter rights and freedoms in Ottawa.

 

A tweet from Ottawa Police from 11:52 a.m. on Sunday February 6 states “Anyone attempting to bring material supports (gas, etc.) to the demonstrators could be subject to arrest. Enforcement is underway.”

 

“People who bring food, water, gasoline or other supplies to peacefully protesting truckers are not breaking any law. There is no basis for this police threat, that was issued by Twitter this morning,” states lawyer Nicholas Wansbutter, retained by the Justice Centre, which is representing the Freedom Convoy.

 

“In a free and democratic society that is governed by the rule of law, citizens can freely associate with each other, including the giving and receiving of goods and gifts. There is no law that would allow the Ottawa Police to arrest people for giving fuel or food to another Canadian,” continues Mr. Wansbutter.

 

“The truckers themselves are exercising their Charter freedoms of expression, association and peaceful assembly, as they are legally entitled to do,” concludes Mr. Wansbutter.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 6:57 p.m. No.3740   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1490510549737783296

 

Rebel News will crowdfund a legal defence for everyone charged/fined/ticketed in Ottawa tonight.

 

We're updating our crowdfunding website http://TruckerLawyer.ca now.

 

Quote Tweet

 

CanadianCryptonaire - Same as Getter

 

@CCryptonaire

 

· 1h

 

Police giving 5 minute warning to demonstrators. If they do not leave, they will be arrested.

 

9:19 PM · Feb 6, 2022·Twitter Web App

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7 p.m. No.3742   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://sputniknews.com/20220207/west-should-focus-on-real-threat-of-us-nuclear-weapons-in-europe–russian-foreign-ministry-1092808654.html

 

MOSCOW, (Sputnik) - The West should think about the real threat of the deployment of US nuclear weapons in Europe instead of talking about a hypothetical deployment of Russian weapons in Belarus, Vladimir Yermakov, Director of the Department for Nonproliferation and Arms Control of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said.

A senior US State Department official said last month that proposed changes to the Belarusian constitution indicate Minsk's plans to allow both Russian conventional and nuclear forces to be stationed on its territory.

"I would like to counter ask the question of whether our European colleagues see a threat to their security not in the hypothetical Belarusian, but in the actual deployment on the territory of a number of NATO countries of American nuclear weapons capable of hitting targets on the territory of Russia," Yermakov said.

He emphasized that the participation of European non-nuclear states in NATO’s "joint nuclear missions" directly contradicts their basic obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

"We categorically disagree with such duplicity of Western countries," Yermakov told Sputnik.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:02 p.m. No.3744   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russia-might-invade-ukraine-soon-tomorrow-white-house

 

Russia Might Invade Ukraine "As Soon As Tomorrow": White House

 

Here we go again… just days after the White House was forced to awkwardly walk back its prior assessment that a Russian invasion of Ukraine was "imminent" - Biden's national security adviser Jake Sullivan said while making the rounds on Sunday news shows that the invasion will come "any day now" - or even as soon as "tomorrow".

 

"Fox News Sunday" host Martha MacCallum asked Sullivan about the White House's assessment of Russia's troop build-up, to which he began in response: "Well, what I can tell you Martha is that we are in the window. Any day now, Russia could take military action against Ukraine or it could be a couple of weeks from now or Russia could choose to take the diplomatic path instead."

 

"The key thing is that the United States needs to be and is prepared for any of those contingencies in lockstep with our allies and partners," Sullivan continued. He further explained that the US had already informed allies of the near-term possibility of war breaking out.

 

"If war breaks out it will come at an enormous human cost to Ukraine, but we believe that based on our preparations and our response, it will come at a strategic cost to Russia as well," he said.

 

Elsewhere on Sunday, while speaking to ABC's This Week, Sullivan got even more alarmist in his predictions. He started by repeating that President Vladimir Putin "has put himself in a position with military deployments to be able to act aggressively against Ukraine at any time now." And that's when he said there could be an invasion "tomorrow"…

 

"We believe that there is a very distinct possibility that Vladimir Putin will order an attack on Ukraine," Sullivan said. "It could take a number of different forms. It could happen as soon as tomorrow or it could take some weeks yet."

 

The Kremlin rejected the fresh statements and media reports from this weekend predicting Russia will invade soon as "madness and scaremongering."

 

It was only last Wednesday that the White House walked back its prior consistent assertions that a Russian invasion of Ukraine was "imminent".

 

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki had explained at the time: "I used it once. I think others have used that once, and we stopped using it because I think it sent a message that we weren't intending to send, which was that we knew that President Putin had made a decision."

 

❗️Russian invasion of Ukraine no longer “imminent”, says the White House, which had promised a Russian invasion every day for near enough two months

 

For a government that missed the Taliban offensive, foretelling a Russian invasion wasn’t going to be easy pic.twitter.com/TjAerpVu7m

— Murad Gazdiev (@MuradGazdiev) February 2, 2022

 

“I would say the vast majority of times I've talked about it, I've said he could invade ‘at any time,’" she added, trying to obfuscate her own unambiguous prior messaging.

 

Sullivan's latest words on the Sunday shows suggests the White House still can't get its own messaging straight. And certainly it's not on board with its own allies like Ukraine, which has lately said the situation is not as dire as the US is painting it.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:03 p.m. No.3745   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3753 >>4105

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hr-mcmaster-trump-rnc-illegitimate-political-discourse_n_62005017e4b0f8a1b845eb25

 

H.R. McMaster Slams The 'Illegitimate Political Discourse' Of Jan. 6 In Dig At RNC

 

Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster on Sunday blasted the storming of the Capitol last Jan. 6 as an “assault” on the government — flatly contradicting the glowing perspective of events by the Republican National Committee last week.

 

Asked on CBS’ “Face The Nation” if he believed the RNC was “in any way” accurate when it defined the Jan. 6 riot as “legitimate political discourse,” McMasters responded: “No. It was illegitimate political discourse because it was an assault on the first branch of government.”

 

Some 140 police officers were injured in the attack, and more than 740 people at the Capitol that day have been arrested.

 

McMaster also said that former Vice President Mike Pence was “absolutely” correct to say in a speech last week that Trump was “wrong” that Pence had the power to throw out the results of the 2020 election that day to help his former boss.

 

Pence added: “Frankly, there is no idea more un-American than the notion that any one person could choose the American president.”

 

All Americans “should agree with Pence,” said McMaster, and “demand more from our political leaders — demand that they stop compromising confidence in our democratic principles and institutions and processes to score partisan, political points.”

 

McMaster was one of a few additional Republicans who came out of the woodwork over the weekend to support Pence — or condemn the Jan. 6 insurrection following the RNC’s attempt to redefine history as it censured Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) for daring to serve on the House committee probing the insurrection.

 

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said on ABC’s “This Week” that he was “glad” Pence finally spoke out about Trump’s pressure to toss out the election.

 

“Let’s face it. Let’s call it what it is,” said the former Trump ally, referring to Jan. 6. It “was a riot that was incited by Donald Trump in an effort to intimidate Mike Pence and the Congress into doing exactly what he said in his own words last week: ‘Overturn the election.’”

 

Sen. John Barrasso ( R-Wyo.) said on “Fox News Sunday” that Pence “did his constitutional duty that day. It’s not the Congress that elects the president; it’s the American people.”

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:04 p.m. No.3746   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.businessinsider.com/sens-joe-manchin-and-lisa-murkowski-endorse-each-other-2022-2

 

Sens. Joe Manchin and Lisa Murkowski crossed party lines and endorsed each other during a joint interview

 

Chairman Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and ranking member Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., arrive for a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on Wednesday, September 16, 2020.

Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

 

Sens. Joe Manchin and Lisa Murkowski sat for a rare joint interview on Sunday.

The Democratic and Republican senators appeared on CNN's "State of the Union."

Manchin endorsed Murkowski, calling her a "dear friend" and she said she'd do the same if he runs again.

 

In a rare show of bipartisanship, Sens. Joe Manchin and Lisa Murkowski appeared in a joint TV interview on Sunday and exchanged endorsements.

 

Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, and Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, appeared on CNN's "State of the Union," during which Manchin endorsed her and called her a "dear friend."

 

"It's hypocritical to work with a person day-in and day-out and then when they're in cycle you're supposed to be against them because they have an R or a D by their name," Manchin said. "If these are good people I've worked with, we've accomplished a lot, why in the world wouldn't I want to continue to work with them?"

 

—State of the Union (@CNNSotu) February 6, 2022

 

Murkowski, who is facing Trump-endorsed primary challenger Kelly Tshibaka this year, also said she would endorse Manchin if he runs for re-election in 2024.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:05 p.m. No.3747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3754 >>4105

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/06/1078691489/navy-seal-hell-week-death

 

 

One Navy SEAL candidate is dead and another is recovering after completing "Hell Week," a grueling test early in the forces' training program.

 

Kyle Mullen, a 24-year-old man from Manalapan, N.J., was pronounced dead at Sharp Coronado Hospital in Coronado, Calif., the Navy said in a series of statements released over the weekend.

 

An investigation into his cause of death is in progress, according to officials.

 

The second candidate, whose name has not been released, was in stable condition at Naval Medical Center San Diego as of Saturday.

 

Both candidates had completed Hell Week — an assessment during the first phase of Basic Underwater Demolition SEAL (BUD/S) training — hours before reporting symptoms and receiving emergency care, the Navy said. The statement did not specify what those symptoms were.

 

"We extend our deepest sympathies to Seaman Mullen's family for their loss," Rear Adm. H.W. Howard III said in one of the statements. "We are extending every form of support we can to the Mullen family and Kyle's BUD/S classmates."

 

The BUD/S training is an early phase of the SEALs' selection process that's known as Hell Week because of its intensity. Over the span of 5 1/2 days, candidates survive on no more than four hours of sleep, while undergoing a series of tests that involve running, swimming and other activities that test physical endurance and mental "toughness" and pain, according to the Navy SEAL website. Only around 25% of candidates make it through the Hell Week to continue on with their training.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:06 p.m. No.3748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/593054-biden-to-visit-israel-later-this-year

 

Biden to visit Israel later this year | TheHill

 

President Biden spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett on Sunday about tensions in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, while also accepting his invitation to visit Israel.

 

"The President thanked the Prime Minister for his invitation to visit Israel and said he looks forward to a visit later this year," the White House said in a statement about the call.

 

During the call, the leaders also "discussed the recent U.S. operation against the ISIS leader in northwestern Syria and the ongoing U.S. commitment to protect the American people and support the defense of its partners across the Middle East region."

 

The White House’s statement also noted that Biden also voiced "his administration’s full support for replenishing Israel’s Iron Dome system," an air defense system meant to intercept short-range rockets.

 

The leaders also spoke about the potential for Russian aggression against Ukraine and other matters including "the threat posed by Iran and its proxies."

 

Israel has previously voiced concerns about the U.S.-led efforts to restore the Iranian nuclear deal of 2015, an agreement that former President TrumpDonald TrumpUN finds North Korea increased missile capabilities: report DeSantis, state AGs pledge to investigate GoFundMe removing page for Canadian vaccine mandate protest The ruling class and the Supreme Court MORE left in 2018. Israel, a long-time adversary of Iran, was also opposed to the initial agreement and argues that it will not keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons capabilities.

 

Last week, a senior State Department official said that the U.S. and Iran only have “a handful of weeks left to get a deal.”

 

TheHill.com

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:09 p.m. No.3749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/xi-putin-olympics-summit-explicitly-and-primarily-anti-us

 

Xi-Putin Olympics Summit Is Explicitly - And Primarily - Anti-US

 

According to the Kremlin, there were a total of 16 agreements across various spheres of cooperation reached during the meeting. These included economic trade, technology, and energy relations.

 

Coinciding with the opening day of the Winter Olympic Games in Beijing, part of the purpose of the high-level meeting was undoubtedly appearance based. Putin additionally wrote an article for Chinese Communist Party (CCP) outlet Xinhua in which he celebrated the growing relationship between Moscow and Beijing.

 

“Our countries play an important stabilizing role in today’s challenging international environment, promoting greater democracy in the system of international relations to make it more equitable and inclusive,” stated Putin. The Russian president went on to explain that one of the primary means for accomplishing this goal is through support for the United Nations Charter.

 

A joint statement put out by the two countries following the Putin-Xi summit in Beijing went further. It stated that Moscow and Beijing seek to “to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture and the international law-based world order, seek genuine multipolarity with the United Nations and its Security Council playing a central and coordinating role.”

 

Members of the U.N. Security Council gather for a meeting at the United Nations in New York, on Sept. 27, 2018. (Don Emmert/AFP via Getty Images)

 

These statements together place emphasis on the fact that Putin continues to see the U.N. as the primary body through which Russia is able to uphold its international influence. Citing the importance of the U.N. Security Council (UNSC), on which Russia and China both permanently sit, Putin reinforces the primacy of the “democratization of international relations.”

 

Under the veneer of international stability and world peace, this latter point is what is truly of critical importance for actors such as Putin and Xi. The U.N. ensures that Russia has just as much power as the United States or its Western allies, especially considering its crucial veto on the Security Council. By allying with fellow UNSC member China, the two hold significant sway in influencing international decision-making.

 

Given Moscow’s current tensions with NATO over Ukraine, it makes sense that Putin would be highlighting the importance of the U.N. A constant refrain from the Kremlin regarding NATO expansion is that no country’s security should be enhanced in a manner that reduces the relative security of a third country. By referring back to the U.N., Putin claims to be relying on a neutral multilateral organization in which every country has equal standing—this, rather than Western-led institutions such as NATO.

 

Xi and the CCP also gain advantage from promoting this line of thinking. Besides also seeking the type of multipolarity that is referred to in these Russia-China joint statements, the international attention of the Olympics presents a favorable opportunity for the CCP to reference that it is not the United States or NATO that unilaterally set international policy.

 

It is reported that only about 25 countries have sent official diplomatic delegations to the Beijing Olympics. The United States and most of its Western developed allies have chosen to diplomatically boycott the Games over human rights concerns with the CCP’s internal governance of China. Placing the meeting with Putin on the opening day of the Games ensures that the spotlight cannot be ignored: the China-Russia bilateral relationship is secure and constantly growing. The continued reference to the U.N. and the Security Council additionally remind the West that the two nuclear-armed powers hold just as much institutional legitimacy as the United States and its allies.

 

Xi called on both countries “to maintain close high-level exchanges, give strong support to each other in safeguarding sovereignty, security and development interests.” This includes “deepening back-to-back strategic coordination and upholding international equity and justice.”

 

Reading between the lines of the frequent calls for international democracy and equality from two of the world’s most authoritarian regimes reveals the true message: We support one another in the right to conduct our domestic policies as we see fit, independent from the judgment of the United States or other democratic nations.

 

That does not mean that Beijing has irrevocably committed itself to Moscow. Even up until the Feb. 4 meeting, Xi withheld making any definite comment one way or the other regarding the escalating situation in Ukraine. This changed at the opening day of the summit. Following the meeting between Xi and Putin, the two countries released a joint statement on “international relations entering a new era and the global sustainable development.”

 

A convoy of Russian armored vehicles moves along a highway in Crimea, on Jan. 18, 2022. (AP Photo)

 

Notably, this included a joint call to halt further NATO enlargement and for the alliance to “abandon its ideologized cold war approaches.” Moscow also reaffirmed its support of Beijing’s stance regarding Taiwan, and both countries voiced their opposition to the AUKUS security alliance between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

 

This is an important development as, again, Beijing has recently held off from committing itself on the Ukraine issue. The opening up of the Games and the absence of Western delegations may have emphasized the heightened tensions between Washington and Beijing. Putin is the most prominent guest at the Games.

 

As stated by Xi: “We are working together to promote a truly multilateral world. Efforts to uphold the real democratic spirit are a reliable foundation for rallying the world towards overcoming crises and protecting equality.”

 

A “multilateral world” is essential for Russia and China to uphold the legitimacy of their own internal systems. As the U.S.-led order continues to try and isolate the two regimes and cast international condemnation on them for their foreign and domestic policy choices, the strength of the Sino-Russian bilateral relationship is increasingly important to withstanding Western pressures.

 

Xi apparently calculated that the advantage of publicly aligning himself closer to Moscow at this period of heightened international tensions outweighed any potential negative cost.

Anonymous ID: 3880d6 Feb. 6, 2022, 7:10 p.m. No.3750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4105

https://www.voanews.com/a/macron-flies-to-moscow-claiming-his-diplomacy-will-end-ukraine-crisis/6430439.html

 

Macron Flies to Moscow Claiming His Diplomacy Will End Ukraine Crisis

 

French President Emmanuel Macron Sunday downplayed the likelihood of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, saying in a newspaper interview that the massing of Russian forces on Ukrainian borders is likely part of a wider Kremlin strategy to secure Western concessions rather than a prelude to a full-scale offensive.

 

“The geopolitical objective of Russia today is clearly not Ukraine, but to clarify the rules of cohabitation with NATO and the EU,” he told France’s Le Journal de Dimanche just hours before boarding a flight to Moscow, where he will hold face-to-face talks Monday with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

 

In a bold claim, Macron said his negotiations with Russia are likely to head off a military conflict.

 

“The intensity of the dialogue we have had with Russia and this visit to Moscow are likely to prevent [a military operation] from happening. Then we will discuss the terms of de-escalation,” he said. “I have always been in a deep dialogue with President Putin and our responsibility is to build historic solutions.”

 

His remarks diverge noticeably from how the Biden administration characterizes Moscow’s military buildup and the danger of a Russian offensive.

 

A Russian invasion of Ukraine “could happen at any time,” White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said Sunday, in what would be the biggest military operation in Europe since World War II.

 

“We believe that the Russians have put in place the capabilities to mount a significant military operation into Ukraine, and we have been working hard to prepare a response,” Sullivan told NBC’s “Meet the Press” show. Sullivan and other U.S. officials estimate that Russia has 70% of a strike force in place for an invasion.

 

Macron’s claim that his negotiations with Russia will prevent a military conflict prompted scorn from political foes in France who accused him of grandstanding. Some commentators and analysts warned he was putting his credibility as a negotiator on the line, cautioning that his efforts since 2017 to court the Russian leader have come up short.

 

French presidential elections are to be held in April and Macron's electoral opponents have accused him of seeking to weaponize foreign policy to try to boost his reelection hopes.

 

“Whether Macron can win anything from Vladimir Putin is another question entirely,” says Mujtaba Rahman, managing director of the Eurasia Group, a global risk and consulting firm. “Previous attempts by Macron to reason with the Russian president have fallen flat on their face,” he tweeted.

 

Macron’s language “makes the rest of Europe quite nervous,” says foreign policy analyst Ulrich Speck, a visiting fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Berlin, a research group.

 

Macron has long called for Russia to be brought back into the Western fold, despite Moscow’s 2014 annexation of Crimea. In his 2017 campaign book “Revolution,” Macron said, “It would be a mistake to break ties with this eastern European power [over Crimea] rather than forming a lasting relationship.”

 

Shortly after entering office, he hosted Putin in Versailles amid talk of detente, but the trip turned sour, the two leaders didn’t meet eye-to-eye and Macron took Putin to task for a host of actions at a joint press conference. Macron criticized Russia for seeking to meddle in Western elections by spreading fake news, disinformation and falsehoods. Macron talked about “very clear lines” of behavior.

 

Two years later, the French president tried again with his search for detente when he hosted Putin at the French president’s summer residence on the Riviera.

 

In a speech, he warned about Europe being caught in the middle of a new Cold War, saying, “It’s not in our interest to be weak and guilty, to forget all our disagreements and to embrace each other again [but] the European continent will never be stable, will never be in security, if we don't pacify and clarify our relations with Russia.”

 

Macron has been reluctant in the past also to impose fresh sanctions on Putin’s Russia.

 

Some Macron critics say his attempts to reset relations with Moscow are as much about his personal ambitions and aim to boost his role in international affairs as anything else.

 

Much like France’s iconic post-World War II leader, Gen. Charles de Gaulle, Macron sees France as a “balancing power” between Russia and the United States. His diplomatic forays alarm some of France’s European allies, notably Russia’s near neighbors.

 

Polish politicians have accused him of ignoring the fact that Russia hasn’t really changed its expansionist ways and they worry Macron’s efforts as a broker between Russia and the United States will lead to the Europeans placing themselves as an equidistant power between Moscow and Washington.

 

Last month, in a speech at the European Parliament, Macron called for the European Union to pursue its own talks with the Kremlin and said the bloc should negotiate a security and stability pact with the Kremlin. Some central European and Baltic leaders said Macron’s comments were ill-timed and risked encouraging the Kremlin to try to play the U.S. and EU off against each other.

 

Carl Bildt, the former Swedish prime minister, said he was at a loss to understand what Macron meant about coming up with “a new order of security and stability.”

 

“These next few months rather seem to call for firm defense of the existing post-1989 order,” he said. Bildt was referencing the European security system based on NATO.

 

Both the United States and Britain have warned that a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine could be imminent, part of a bid to restore a Russian sphere of influence in eastern and central Europe.

 

Russia has demanded that Ukraine never become a NATO member and says NATO’s military presence should be removed from the former Communist states of eastern Europe that have joined the Western alliance. NATO officials say countries should be free to decide whether to join the alliance.

 

In his interview with Le Journal de Dimanche, Macron spoke again about a new European security arrangement, saying that while “the security and sovereignty of Ukraine or any other European State cannot be a subject for compromise,” it is “also legitimate for Russia to pose the question of its own security.”

 

“We must protect our European brothers by proposing a new balance capable of preserving their sovereignty and peace. This must be done while respecting Russia and understanding the contemporary traumas of this great people and nation,” he said.

 

Justyna Gotkowska of the Warsaw-based Center for Eastern Studies, a research group, questioned who had mandated Macron to talk about a new European security system.

 

“What legitimacy does Macron have to propose this? Europeans haven’t agreed in NATO and in the OSCE on ‘a new balance,’ to the contrary,” she tweeted.

 

French officials say Macron’s trip has been coordinated fully with Western allies and told the Reuters news agency that the Élysée Palace has learned from past errors of judgment to ensure that all EU and NATO allies are kept fully informed about Macron’s talks with Putin.

 

Speck, of the German Marshall Fund, said it would have been better if Macron had been accompanied by other Western leaders for his trip to Moscow. It “would make Europe look much stronger and make sure that there is a united message,” he tweeted.

 

He added, “What we get instead: an open-ended meeting between Macron and Putin” and that nobody else is in the room “besides translators.”