Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 18, 2022, 7:28 p.m. No.5654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5627

this is also why they tried their hardest to isolate us from each other during the plandemic.. when we're alone and lonely, we're more likely to succumb to fear. not to be gay but i'm so glad anons are actually posting on this board. i had given up on qresearch years ago but really missed having a place to talk to awake, likeminded frens, even if it's just to share links and shitpost. hope we can keep this thing going.

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 18, 2022, 7:40 p.m. No.5658   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5659 >>5660

UPDATE: the National Guard Bureau just sent out notices to other states telling them to be prepared to support the DC National Guard.

 

US Park Police and Capitol Police also requested additional assistance.

 

https://twitter.com/BowTiedRanger/status/1494860184119873540

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 18, 2022, 9:33 p.m. No.5667   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5665

yea i'm sure there are lurkers too. it's just easier to shitpost on a board that's 75% shitposting and boomer tier memes

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 9:42 a.m. No.5723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5726 >>5729 >>5882

>>5696

yep, i remember her. i told everyone she was a karen years ago but no one believed me. i knew comms wasn't a good place for bakers to be, because all discussions should have taken place on the board where anons could see. instead, they were taken off qresearch and comms turned from a place to discuss baking to a club/hangout for bakers.

 

i was the baker (or at least the first baker) who they literally excluded from baking because i wasn't part of their club. they refused to hand off to me because i didn't have their retarded ebonics handoff lingo down and didn't namefag. that entire group pretended to be shitty at baking but i knew it was malevolence disguised as incompetence and would call it out every time i saw it.

 

the sad thing is that with Q going mainstream, the majority of anons there are just sheep operating at a slightly higher power level, so they couldn't recognize the patterns until it was too late. each tiny action of subversion means nothing on its own. when you call it out, you look like you're being antagonistic. but you have to see and recognize the larger pattern at play when you connect each data point. newfags were incapable of doing that. just like we connect data points here to form a general map of what's going on in the world. not everyone can do that. many can only see isolated data points and even then, they suffer from amnesia so they forget what has come before. they're also blindly naive and give bakers the benefit of the doubt.

 

it's always been a slippery slope. sure, leaving out a couple notables didn't matter then. continually misnumbering breads didn't matter, then. we gotta "use the whole buffalo" right? each tiny thing didn't matter, especially to fastjack and his BVs. but look where we are now: they own the board. it was always their plan. they weren't subverting slowly bit by bit just for fun. this was always the endgame and nothing was ever done to stop it. if Q comes here, OSS has to make sure he does not repeat the same mistakes.

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 9:48 a.m. No.5728   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5726

that's the thing. problems are always created when discussion are made off the main board. everything should be transparent. all anons who contribute to the board and to the movement should be able to see discussions. it's when that conversation moves to other boards, to private discord servers or other chats, that shit happens. that's where people can be manipulated, alliances and enmities form, we lose our anonymity and human drama takes over. is there a /pol/ server? do people on /pol/ hang out off the board and recognize each other and namefag? no, they don't (afaik). they're all anonymous and don't care who is behind the keyboard. they judge only by the literal words posted in public on the board. qresearch should have been the same way, but it wasn't and here we are.

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 9:51 a.m. No.5730   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5731

>>5726

i am almost certain that those "baker meetings" happened privately somewhere else too. those bakers were way too chummy with each other. at the time, i suspected it was pastebin DMs

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 9:57 a.m. No.5732   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5729

>If I am fucking up, tell me.

mark of a good leader, i will, and thank you.

i would tell fastjack all the time, every time, exactly when/how/why he was fucking up but i was just attacked for it. you have to have a certain level of discernment and emotional intelligence to be able to see who is friend and who is foe. he was surrounded by idiots like pen who thought everyone was out to get him, even anons who only wanted to keep the board from burning to the ground. qresearch was my home and baking there was one of the greatest honors for me. still such a damn shame.

 

a few relevant Bible verses for any lurking biblefags:

 

Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands in not quickly broken. (Ecclesiastes 4: 12).

Where no counsel [is], the people fall: but in the multitude of counselors [there is] safety. (Proverbs 11: 14 KJV).

Plans fail for lack of counsel, but with many advisers they succeed. (Proverbs 15: 22).

Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses. (Proverbs 27: 6).

The way of a fool seems right to him, but a wise man listens to advice. (Proverbs 12: 15).

As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another (Proverbs 27: 17).

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 10:53 a.m. No.5750   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5748

Interesting Alice in Wonderland reference.. I’m phonefagging but can someone cross reference with early Alice Q posts? Can’t be a coincidence given recent Hillary happenings. Tom knows more than he lets on, methinks..

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 1:52 p.m. No.5779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5748

>judicial watch

>Alice & MH

is he referencing this?

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v-State-Hillary-emails-July-2-00687-99-100.pdf

HRC in SA

Posted the same day there's renewed interest in Epstein…

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 2:31 p.m. No.5784   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5785 >>5790 >>5824 >>5866 >>5964

on the NYT article about Q:

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/19/technology/qanon-messages-authors.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

 

anons, i think we really need to dig on this. it's not like any other hit piece. imo the significance here is not that they're trying to find out who Q is or pin it on Ron and Baruch.

 

to my knowledge someone correct me if i'm wrong this is the first time in 4 years that they have printed an actual Q post in an article about Q. 2 of them actually.

 

questions worth pondering:

 

1) why is this article being printed today, February 19, 2022 when there are giant happenings around Canada and Ukraine/Russia? why would they bring up Q now when Q hasn't posted in over a year now?

2) why these 2 posts? out of thousands of posts, why did they choose these 2?

3) what has changed in their strategy against Q and our movement, that they would publish the text of the posts themselves instead of just slandering Q and anons like they usually do?

 

my theory on 1 and 3 is that something must be coming related to Q that they're trying to get ahead of. something like a Q proof on Truth Social by President Trump.. maybe even a "My Fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.." message

 

#2 is trickier

Q67: 11/3/17

>11.3

>implies Tony and John Podesta have escaped the country

>Where is BO?

has someone important fled the country?

we should track Hussein at the very least. last I heard, he was in Hawaii scowling at construction workers renovating his house.

 

and has anyone heard from either of the Podestas lately? we've seen Huma and Hillary in the news, but afaik nothing of the Podestas. this might be changing soon.. we know they love to seed things into the public consciousness. will we be hearing more about the Podestas in the coming weeks?

 

**also, i might be paranoid here but maybe BO has something to do with BO of /qresearch/ - Q changed his references to BHO eventually, so maybe there's some signficance to that

 

Q2943: 3/3/19

Note: THEY CUT OUT OF MOST OF THE POST

i need help digging on this, so i'm not sure exactly what the significance is yet.

is this a warning that all those - in government and media- who claimed to have evidence of collusion but didn't (like Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu) will soon be exposed or held accountable?

 

is this a warning to [them] or something more?

 

angles we could take:

-analyze the dates - today and relevant deltas, 11/3 and 3/3 and relevant deltas and look for relevant happenings at the time and/or match with relevant Q posts

-track obama's movements

-track podesta's movements

-see if there's any connection to the Brunel "suicide"

would be great if there was a planefag in here to look into commercial/private flights out of the country the past few days.

 

i might begrudgingly post this on qresearch too. thoughts?

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 2:42 p.m. No.5788   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5824 >>5964

quote from Senator Ron Johnson for an article in the New York Post, published yesterday

 

https://nypost.com/2022/02/18/dems-knew-and-did-nothing-to-stop-the-russia-collusion-hoax/

 

“Who’s the ringleader here? Was it Clinton? Was it John Podesta? Was it Marc Elias? Michael Sussmann? I think it’s all the above.

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 2:44 p.m. No.5789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5824 >>5964

January 23 article on Tony Podesta:

 

Tony Podesta pulls in $1 million lobbying White House on behalf of Huawei

 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tony-podesta-lobbying-joe-biden-white-house-huawei

 

Tony Podesta made $1 million lobbying the White House on behalf of Chinese telecommunications company Huawei, public disclosure forms show.

 

Podesta earned $500,000 lobbying the "Executive Office of the President" on "Issues related to telecommunication services and impacted trade issues" in the fourth quarter of 2021, the New York Post reported, citing public disclosure forms released last week. He pulled in another $500,000 from Huawei to lobby the "White House Office" on "Issues related to telecommunication services and impacted trade issues" in the third quarter of 2021.

 

Tony Podesta is the older brother of John Podesta, who served as the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential run and as an adviser to President Barack Obama and chief of staff to President Bill Clinton.

 

The FCC designated Huawei a national security threat in 2020 due to its "close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and China’s military apparatus," according to former FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, FOX Business previously reported.

 

The Trump administration also persuaded countries such as Australia and Japan to ban Huawei in 5G projects due to fears it would aid China in surveilling abroad.

 

Huawei has denied working closely with the Chinese government, arguing it is only a supplier of tech resources. A report from the Washington Post last month, however, detailed internal documents from the company showing how it surveils Chinese citizens and political dissidents.

 

The Biden administration described the Chinese company as "a national security threat" after the Washington Post report was published.

 

"I don’t have a comment on the specifics of this report but President Biden and the administration continue to believe Huawei is a national security threat," a National Security Council spokesperson told Fox in December. "That is why it remains on the entity list and why this administration designated it under E.O. 14032 for operating in the defense and related [material] and/or surveillance technology sectors of the PRC economy."

 

Podesta was hired by Huawei over the summer to assist the company with "[t]elecommunications and trade issues," after leaving lobbying for the art world following Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation during the Trump administration.

 

The White House did not immediately respond to FOX Business’ request for comment on the public disclosure forms.

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 19, 2022, 3:01 p.m. No.5796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5824 >>5964

Feb. 10

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-overshadowed-obama-former-president-engages-unseemly-politicking-ncna1288945

too long to post but this was the best sentence:

 

It is almost as if Obama and Trump have emerged as dueling presidents-in-exile to the detriment of the man now in office, and likely those who come after them.

 

referencing this

 

WASHINGTON — Former President Barack Obama will speak to the House Democratic caucus on Thursday, two sources familiar with his plans told NBC News.

 

Theprivate meetingis organized by Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the caucus chair, and is expected to take place virtually.

 

i do wonder what Obama talked about in this private meeting and if he knows he's fucked. and if the New York Times knows he's fucked too. panic panic all around!

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/obama-speak-house-democrats-thursday-rcna15507

Anonymous ID: eb80f9 Feb. 20, 2022, 7:20 a.m. No.5915   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5916

Queen E tested positive for Covid aka they’re waiting to kill her off and/or announce her death til it’s politically expedient.

 

And

 

Fiona Hill is randomly back in the news and trending on twitter. Can’t think of a single reason why that might be happening..

 

https://twitter.com/cnni/status/1495394094201413632

 

Gooood morning, anons