AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Is Working on Resolution to Reclaim Arizona’s 2020 Electors: “I Actually Have A Resolution In Markup Right Now.

The Wisconsin General Assembly voted on Tuesday to advance Rep. Tim Ramthun’s resolution to reclaim the 2020 electors for President and Vice President who were certified under fraudulent purposes.

The Gateway Pundit reported on this huge breaking news yesterday.

Arizona State Representative and Trump-endorsed candidate for Secretary of State Mark Finchem told The Gateway Pundit that he is already working on a five-page resolution to reclaim Arizona’s electors. “We have a mountain of evidence,” said Finchem, and more is being delivered to Attorney General Mark Brnovich daily.”

The Gateway Pundit reported that The Arizona Senate Government Committee recently passed seven sweeping election security measures.

The Gateway Pundit correspondent Jordan Conradson spoke to Rep. Finchem about new election laws, Arizona’s fraudulent electors, and his upcoming event in McAllen, Texas.

Finchem revealed that he is working on a resolution to reclaim Arizona’s 2020 electors!

Finchem: Well, I actually have a resolution in markup right now. We are dotting our T’s, crossing our I’s. We just want to make sure, I mean, this is historic. It doesn’t happen very often. In fact, in the history of our nation, this has not happened more than just a handful. of times over the entire 250 plus years.

Here in Arizona, we have a mountain of evidence, in fact, the resolution that I’m putting together right now we have five pages, and that is growing because more evidence is being turned over to our attorney general’s office. It’s beyond clear and convincing.

I was just reviewing some of the case law that supports the duty of the legislature to act. We have a duty. It’s not an option. It’s a duty.

The mountain of evidence was delivered to Attorney General Brnovich four months ago and Arizona tirelessly awaits the results of his investigation and the ongoing audit of the election routers.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand justice.

Contact Arizona Legislators and demand a yes vote to reclaim Arizona’s fraudulently certified 2020 electors.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/exclusive-az-state-rep-mark-finchem-working-resolution-reclaim-arizonas-2020-electors-actually-resolution-markup-right-now-video/

>>1002

o7

https://mobile.twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1486512837606445058?

US explains why it asked Russia not to make its security response public

Diplomacy thrives in darkness, Washington appears to suggest

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has revealed a list of diplomatic requests sent to his counterpart in Moscow in response to Russia’s security proposals, describing the paper as a “serious diplomatic path forward, should Russia choose it” during a Wednesday press conference.

However, while he restated several of Washington’s talking points with regard to the confrontation over Ukraine, he declined to go into specifics, arguing that “diplomacy has the best chance to succeed when we provide space for confidential talks.”

Russia-US security talks close with both sides citing major differences

Read more

Russia-US security talks close with both sides citing major differences

The top US diplomat described the document as addressing “core principles” that Washington is determined to uphold, such as “Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the right of states to choose their own security arrangements and alliances.”

Other issues covered included “reciprocal transparency measures regarding force posture on Ukraine,” “measures to increase confidence regarding military exercises and maneuvers in Europe” as well as “arms control related to missiles in Europe,” and “a follow-on agreement to the START Treaty that covers all nuclear weapons.” The US and Russia last year extended the New START Treaty by five years, meaning the last remaining arms reduction agreement between the two nations will expire in February 2026.

Blinken insisted the US was “open to dialogue” and would “prefer diplomacy” – but only “if Russia de-escalates its aggression toward Ukraine” and ceases what he called “inflammatory rhetoric.” He explained that NATO had developed and delivered its own paper while insisting the alliance’s document fully reinforced the US’ own and that there was “no daylight” between the country and the transcontinental alliance it controls.

Despite the diplomacy-centered rhetoric, however, the secretary of state boasted the US had provided more weapons to Ukraine in 2022 than in any previous year, as well as authorizing its NATO allies to transfer their own weaponry to the supposedly-imperiled Eastern European nation. The US and NATO have also moved or activated thousands of troops and other military resources in the area in the event of what they insist is a near-inevitable invasion by Russia.

Blinken met with Russian FM Sergey Lavrov last week to discuss the comprehensive list of security guarantees Moscow delivered last month, but the State Department took a confrontational pose on Monday, announcing that it would not make any “concessions” to Russia that did not benefit both nations. One particular sticking point has been Russia’s insistence that NATO cease expansion eastward, a guarantee Washington has thus far refused to consider.

The US Secretary of State added that he expects to speak with his Russian counterpart again “in the coming days.”

https://www.rt.com/news/547453-blinken-response-russia-security-ukraine/

Report: Capitol Police Are Spying On Members Of Congress And The Americans They Meet

As part of their job in screening visitors to the U.S. Capitol (should the complex ever re-open to the public, that is), U.S. Capitol Police often rummage through backpacks and purses. Lately, they may also be rummaging through more than that: your tax records, real estate holdings, and soC_Al media posts. All without your knowledge.

Besty Woodruff Swan and Daniel Lippman broke the details this week of a new Capitol Police initiative that involves deep dives into the speech, background, and lifestyle details of who members of Congress are meeting with, including donors, Hill staff, mayors, state legislators, and other Americans exercising their First Amendment right to petition their government.

In one example Swan and Lippman cite, a donor meeting attended at a private home by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, meant the homeowner and attendees had their soC_Al media scrutinized and evaluated for foreign contacts by Capitol Police. A donor meeting with Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., the House Republican whip, received similar treatment. The Capitol Police were directed to “search for any information about event attendees, including donors and staff, ‘that would cast a member in a negative light.'”

In both cases, the lawmakers and the attendees were unaware these checks were taking place.

All of this is occurring under the guise of the “enhanced security measures” deemed necessary after the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. However, it is unclear how such measures would have actually prevented the Jan. 6 events in the first place.

The Capitol Police have provided no detailed justification. Nor have they said what they are doing with the records, how long those records are being stored, or what other purposes they have. The agency is only subject to congressional oversight — not to public records requests.

One can imagine how easily these searches could become politicized: Personal details on Capitol Hill staff, state legislators, or donors are dispersed to partisans and suddenly leaked at an opportune political moment by some agency conveniently immune to the Freedom of Information Act and subject to limited oversight. After the aggressive leaking, spinning, and shaming that bureaucrats engaged in during the Donald Trump years, we’ve seen what’s possible.

This practice also comes dangerously close to burdening the free exercise of political speech, which includes the right to petition the government “for a redress of grievances” without fear of reprisal. As Rep. Kelly Armstrong, R-N.D., a former criminal defense attorney, pointed out to Swan and Lipmann, these measures also walk right up to the line of “spying on members of Congress, their staff, their constituents and their supporters.”

“Anybody involved with implementing this without making it known to the actual members of Congress should resign or be fired immediately,” Armstrong went on. “And I’m not big on calling for resignations.”

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/26/capitol-police-spying-on-members-visitors-is-more-ruling-class-safety-theater/