Again, why is RRN being used as a valid source?
Why would you post a RRN article unless deliberately trying to state something specific? why else would RRN be posted? Nothing for comment, nothing as context or connection, just the article?
Actions quickly expose the person.
What's amazing is how a flurry of responses from the same anon appears when a valid point is made? That's amazing.
Your attention to try and justify this makes you glow a bit. This anon has always tried to contribute, w/little success, but still attempts…yet here you are…working diligently trying to 'out' this anon as something, while trying really hard to justify a satire site as a legit puzzle piece.
No…not at all suspicious
Again, you are proving my point…
Unless the purpose of Hivemind is to NOT do research…in which case there must be nothing left within the realm of seeking answers, because JewResearch has little of that going on…but you knew that didn't you?
It's quite clear your purpose here. I'll continue to dig, but when I post, it's going to have relevancy and purpose so there's no question why the post was made and what it pertained to…bet you can't say the same, eh?
Yeah, you go ahead and do that, oh and my three posts, as you pointed out, seemed to be so painful that you spent all this time trying to convince others, who BTW have seen/read similar question in the past re: RRN, that RRN should be taken in, without context or connection,..just an article…and just add that to their list of possible good info.
But no…you didn't come here to infil at all.
Nothing to see here…move along.
What happened to the past conversation re: RRN sourcing? Or is this no longer OSS?
You called out one of your helpers, I believe it was a BV and removed them from the position for doing exactly what you just did to this anon.
So…either OSS was removed from access (not likely), this is NOT OSS, which I suppose is possible, or possibly the boards have been take over.
I've state numerous times in the past that this anon is still learning things, but paying attention and could be mistaken due to combat injuries to the brain, however, I am quite certain regarding the above stated events.
Is this OSS or not? If so, do you not remember removing a BV for pushing the RRN?
Not sure how much wrong you can be. This anon has been the one trying to learn how to actually contribute to JewResearch some time ago and trying to understand how everything is supposed to work. Still trying…so not sure how to verify since we're all anons but I've never changed my language or posting style.
ALways VPN in, always. Plus I never contributed enough to be concerned w/ IP Hopping (plus the VPN takes so much time to reconnect I wouldn't see its function in doing so).
Then I;ll take that as this place being infiltrated as well, then. I wasn't sure at first, but the lack of organization for actual research should have been the first aha moment, but again, combat injuries have slowed response and absorption.
Where the actual fook is the research???
I've been watching from the moment you created what I thought was supposed to be a legit location since JewResearch was obviously taken over, and cannot seem to catch onto the digging portion?
Please enlighten the less smart anons on the rhythm here. Are there going to be ongoing digs on info? Is it going to be similar in org to JewResearch (serialized?)? Trying to figure out how to contribute.
Sort of figured it would be laid out like what most anons expected where items are brought forth so anons can dig and produce valid sourcing and proofs. I can't seem to figure out where the topics of interest are (i.e. are they the individual locations here?).
Guidance would be great!
Also, accusations that this anon has been anything other than who they are doesn't show insight but I don't suppose anons can be vetted for authenticity. Patterns of speech don't change though. Not sure that helps anyone in vetting.
So where are the topics of concern?