Anonymous ID: 2f15f4 March 11, 2022, 9:39 p.m. No.9691   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9689

What's next. manning is Q?

 

 

>>9690

>So Refreshing.

 

<It's what evil is. Not insomuch a fairy tale, where the caricatures signify easy telltale markers, but what human behaviors have given rise to evil.

 

Now to identify the origin of what is truly evil now that a distinction is made. What Justification does evil have to exist? It has none. Ergo

 

>Widespread Famine Versus Individual Necessity

 

If the Famine is Induced specifically for the purpose to harm then is this different from a Famine induced because the farmer had to feed their family alone?

 

Obviously.

 

>Contrasting good is not NOT doing these things, just because you do not be evil doesn't mean you've done good, just that you haven't tripped and fallen on a stupid conception, or purposefully done so.

 

But there comes the weighing of validity of the cause of any action considered "Good" or "Evil"

 

What is "Forgivable 'Evil'" and what is not.

What is "Undoubtedly 'Good'" and what is not.

 

>The idea of doing good however is within what framework, because you can be selfless even to excess, give away all your preparations for upcoming winter months, to people who have yet to learn to prepare themselves.

 

Indeed one can be "Good" even to their own detriment or even self destruction. I do not believe that indicates a presence of evil intent unless there is some invisible force driving the individually to elf-sacrifice to such an extent that they themselves are extinguished in the process… enh. That may be "Evil" but not the person themself I would think as they were un-aware.

 

 

Many arguments over whether or not self righteousness or ignorance as a cause to blame for any evil in that statement but to each their own.

 

<While we are in this realm you have to deal with mortal ideas instead of things that make it easier like conceptually getting rid of the idea of needs or wants first and THEN saying well of course I would choose to follow Jesus if tested at the pearly gates. As a thought experiment it's a gymnastic maneuver to escape tenets and is clever but you see that right?

 

Indeed. Psychedelics are exceptional for thought experiments so long as they are expected and prepared or guided.

 

>In that case it's good at being clever, for whatever it's worth. Control structures will use thought stopping activities to cease these kind of musings because it's not your place to wonder what is good exactly,

But can you do that to people on the regular? C'est Egoiste

Sociopathy unless self induced for concentration, aid others, or escape a dangerous situation.

 

Will have to check it out later on the replayer.

 

Ahh.

>''"Refresh ye others and be ye Refreshed"''