Re-fucking-gardless the 93R is one of the best concealable weapons in existence, the ultimate evolution of the flawed SMG concept. Only thing that comes even vaguely close and only on "huh thats interesting" points is the PP2000.
You can't make me go to space, do you know why? Because I have a Beretta 93R and you won't see it coming until brrrrrrt.
93R can fire in semi-auto mode as well, how is your pic in any way superior?
>as its basically 9mm+P+ with a weird bullet that can penetrate IIIA armor
>in a bull barrel design that spits them out with more accuracy than an assault rifle
Nah not interesting at all.
>loo at the picture in this post
>pictures are sure interesting but sometimes you have to struggle and read the text that comes with them
Look I'm plain NOT GOOD at guessing what the fuck you're thinking, or what you meant to say. So how about you explain it? Put it in terms that you might say to another person, for the purpose of communication.
If you say every third word of a sentence you're thinking about, the other person can't guess the other two words, they're stuck with a mishmash of useless information. Stop thinking between the lines and say what you mean.
>just unusual ammo
And you don't find unusual things interesting?!!?!
>Go back to where you came from
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? What is your problem with someone saying "assault rifle"?
No, assault weapon is the idiotic journalist nomenclature.
In late 18th century the entire concept of battle was broken into "phases". Approach phase, scout phase, supply phase, transport phase, but the final phase was called the assault phase. In WWI, the generals at the time ran into a problem, where it was basically impossible to "dig" an entrenched enemy out and kill him, which meant that fortification basically destroyed the assault phase of military doctrine. This was known as the assault phase problem and was popular in military circles in the interwar period. As a tangent, there existed the German (1932), the French (1910) and about the Russian (1915) school of how to go around that - in order the solution was to ignore the entrenched enemies, to pound him flat with explosives and force a crossing, and to poke holes in his lines and go through them to cut his logistics. America and UK later took the French doctrine and applied it to bombers, and America even invented the ultimate explosive, which painted in broad strokes the next 70 years.
But the POINT is that during and after WWI there were designed a fucktonne of weapons purely for this phase of combat. Assault guns were cannons mounted to armored vehicles that could come close enough (under fire) to be pinpoint accurate and hit the weakest part of fortifications. The Lewis assault phase rifle, the federov avtomat and other such rifles were designed to provide covering fire and make the enemy duck while the troops approached. 20 or 30 guys all firing assault rifles produced an unending stream of bullets, since only half of them would be reloading at any given time.
The assault rifle of today is an evolution of these early concepts.
Assault WEAPON is a retarded term, because it means nothing. A spoon, used in the assault phase of combat, was an "assault weapon". In typical journo fashion, it is a complete misunderstanding of history. And it's actually technically wrong, because the weapons they apply it to are semi automatic which actually completely excludes them from assault phase combat! It's like calling a SUV with a glass window on the roof a "combat vehicle" because some humvees have holes in their roof for .50 cal mounts, not only is it technically wrong because the glass prevents this mounting, but its also figuratively wrong.
tl;dr
<Assault weapon bad
>Assault rifle good
PLEASE COPY THIS POST, NEXT TIME IM JUST POSTING FACEPALMS UNTIL YOU GO AWAY
we are doomed
as a species