Anonymous ID: 370b0a Oct. 6, 2021, 12:22 p.m. No.100458   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0498 >>0509

Not gonna take it: 427,000+ parents fight back against National School Board Assoc calling them “domestic terrorists”

 

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/parent-groups-slam-school-board-assocation-insinuating-they-are-terrorists/

 

Title 18, Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law

 

From SCOTUS "NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN (1964)"

 

"Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials."

 

From SCOTUS "West Virginia State Board of Education vs Barnette (1943)"

 

"Free public education, if faithful to the ideal of secular instruction and political neutrality, will not be partisan or enemy of any class, creed, party, or faction. If it is to impose any ideological discipline, however, each party or denomination must seek to control, or failing that, to weaken the influence of the educational system"

 

"As first and moderate methods to attain unity have failed, those bent on its accomplishment must resort to an ever-increasing severity. As governmental pressure toward unity becomes greater, so strife becomes more bitter as to whose unity it shall be. Probably no deeper division of our people could proceed from any provocation than from finding it necessary to choose what doctrine and whose program public educational officials shall compel youth to unite in embracing."

 

"It seems trite but necessary to say that the First Amendment to our Constitution was designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. Authority here is to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority."

 

"But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."

 

I know there is a drop, can't find yet…