random memes/info
start at 2:06 for old vid of joe talking 'truth about options'
'it will take a year to get them out'
https://youtu.be/wycvHg-zaE8
WATCH! 13 Year Old Video Of Joe Biden FOUND! He Is Such A LIAR It's Not Even Funny.
479,884 views
Nov 6, 2021
https://www.washingtontimes.com/ headlines 12/1/2021
>19
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/dec/1/house-transportation-chair-becomes-19th-democrat-a/
House Transportation Committee Chairman Peter DeFazio on Wednesday became the 19th Democrat to announce his retirement from Congress.
Mr. DeFazio, who has represented Oregon’s 4th congressional district since 1987, announced he would not be seeking reelection next year.
“It is time to pass the baton to the best generation so I can focus on my health and well being,” said Mr. DeFazio. “This was a tough decision at a challenging time for our republic with the very pillars of our democracy under threat, but I am bolstered by the passion and principles of my colleagues in Congress and the ingenuity and determination of young Americans who are civically engaged and working for change.”
The exodus of Democratic incumbents is significantly larger than that faced by Democrats ahead of the 2010 elections, when the party lost 63 House seats.
Republicans were quick to point to Mr. DeFazio’s retirement as proof the political environment is souring for Democrats.
“Committee Chairs don’t retire unless they know their majority is gone,” said Courtney Parella, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Congressional Committee. “Nancy Pelosi’s days as speaker are numbered.”
The House transportation committee chairman has been a steadfast ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat. Earlier this year, that relationship was put to the test when the House took up President Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure package.
Mr. DeFazio initially refused to ”rubber stamp” the proposal, which had been negotiated by a group of bipartisan senators and the White House. In particular, Mr. DeFazio attempted to change the package to include more funding for public transit and climate change programs. ..
continuing to test MMRI; good luck on the test Mannarino
kek
26-Jul-2018 4:02:24 PM EDT
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/399010-meadows-swaps-rosenstein-impeachment-efforts-for-contempt-after
Do you understand what is happening?
Think optics.
31-Oct-2017 11:31:00 PM EDT
Get the popcorn, Friday & Saturday will deliver on the MAGA promise. POTUS knows he must clean house (gov't) in order to 'free up' and demonstrate who has authority in order to pass important legislation. This was always the priority. Remember, AG Sessions cannot look like an impartial player that is out to get all former Obama team members as we need him for other important work. All will come into focus and for anyone to think POTUS is not in control is kidding themselves. Also, he's 100% insulated with zero risk of impeachment (fact).
31-Oct-2017 11:00:15 PM EDT
SCI[F]
Military Intelligence.
What is 'State Secrets' and how upheld in the SC?
What must be completed to engage MI over other (3) letter agencies?
What must occur to allow for civilian trials?
Why is this relevant?
What was Flynn's background?
Why is this relevant?
Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o auth?
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?
Was TRUMP asked to run for President?
Why?
By Who?
Was HRC next in line?
Was the election suppose to be rigged?
Did good people prevent the rigging?
Why did POTUS form a panel to investigate?
Has POTUS ever made a statement that did not become proven as true/fact?
What is POTUS in control of?
What is the one organization left that isn't corrupt?
Why does the military play such a vital role?
Why is POTUS surrounded by highly respected generals?
Who guards former Presidents?
Why is that relevant?
Who guards HRC?
Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate?
Why hasn't the MB been classified as a terrorist org?
What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism?
What happens if mayors/ police comms/chiefs do not enforce the law?
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?
Why is this important?
What is Mueller's background? Military?
Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering?
How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?
Who is helping POTUS?
very tricky play ds does imo
did Anons ever use QAnon in their memes?
did QAnon get big on twtr?
after it got big did msm start using it?
then what did Q say? >>109031
also 'Deploy camouflage.
Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc. to avoid ban/termination _censorship install.
Algos [sniffers] bypass.
Keep charging, Midnight Riders!'
now ask 'why in this order?' and 'what results yielded?' - 4734 17-Sep-2020 4:40:53 PM EDT
opps
>Keep charging, Midnight Riders!'
>
>now ask 'why in this order?' and 'what results yielded?' - 4734 17-Sep-2020 4:40:53 PM EDT
Keep charging, Midnight Riders!' - 4734 17-Sep-2020 4:40:53 PM EDT
now ask 'why in this order?' and 'what results yielded?'
so kek, danks
Sather exposes person behind real raw news fyi
https://rumble.com/vny4pi-clickbait-of-the-week-telegram-scams-realrawnews-q-phones-wilcocks-new-insi.html
Clickbait of the Week! - Telegram Scams, RealRawNews, Q Phones!, Wilcock's New Insider, Ben Fulford
Jordan Sather Published October 19, 2021 5,766 Views
i don't trust greenwald but he SHOWs how the left acts kek
https://rumble.com/vq15ht-the-poisonous-left-liberal-mentality-on-dialogue-and-race.html
The Poisonous Left-Liberal Mentality on Dialogue and Race
Glenn Greenwald
Published November 30, 2021 18,181 Views
> fuck man I am trying! kek
you are doing it right
>Do you want to know what we think?
always
>ANONS are so loyal to a fault.. they could not see what was going on, because they want so badly to be apart of it, something so awesome and great.. understood, but they also could not see it from a 5D perspective and see that snakes were in and around them..
>THEY are being led by snakes, we are free, we many not be many, but we still operate like the actual midnight riders did..
that is a hard part
some will leave for the right reasons, some will stay for the wrong reasons and some will stay for the right reasons so i suppose some will leave for the wrong reasons kek
strange game
i heard some numbers on tv (sadly) so i tried them and got those
it prolly means nothing but i posted them for notes i can click back to
i don't know anything about QRs Future re purge or no
those pics were to show that Anons once memed QAnons and even Q+ mentioned QAnon
i think People loved the memes and Anons and Q they started using QAnons
then it got big, so big ds had to do something so they hijacked it
if we let them they win/hijack success, but if we show the whole timeline people will understand what they did; swamp moves
imo imo
reminds me twtr
i was leaving twtr after the election, i even announced it; i thought Trump would win easily based on crowd sizes and momentum
then Trump loses to shady elections so i stay on twtr (until they kicked me off kek)
i stayed thinking if info sharers are getting banned on twtr i should stay until the get me
twtr got me so then i moved to another place which is pretty ok
i guess there are many reasons to stay and leave so i can't really say what's right or wrong
when that fake bo started deleting post i knew what would happen so i left and haven't been back
i still smile thinking about all the wonderful times there and all the cool people
shills were easily filtered or debated
obviously fake banning bo's, well that felt like a waste of time so i moved on
i have no hard feelings for any1 that stayed and wish Anons the best always
when/if Q post again, i will be back to say hi
>.. to let us know what is going on so we can counter the narrative in real time
Q taught Anons and now Anons can almost figure out what is going on and they can def counter the narrative in real time IF/when they work together
also another thing that is dif is back then did Normies believe fake news, what about now?
random info/memes
https://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/502980006/reports-suggest-nsa-director-mike-rogers-is-on-his-way-out
.. GREENE: Why would Donald Trump want someone in his administration who is viewed as failing in many ways during his tenure?
BAMFORD: It's an interesting question. I don't know. He'd have to see who else is out there. The real odd situation is the fact that Admiral Rogers has come out recently and said that he was convinced that it was Russia that launched the DNC attack. So that goes completely opposite to what the Trump people have been saying.
GREENE: Downplaying Russia's involvement, yeah.
BAMFORD: Right. He's been saying that there isn't that much evidence and so forth. So that would make for an interesting conversation during that time in New York.
GREENE: This could be passed off as sort of an internal Washington power struggle, but it sounds like there's a lot at stake here.
BAMFORD: Well, there's a tremendous amount at stake because I think this is where things are going to happen. It's going to happen with cyber, I think, under a Trump administration. I mean, he's come out and said he doesn't want to put boots on the ground in the Middle East. But what he did was he put General Flynn in as his national security adviser, and one of the…
GREENE: General Mike Flynn, yeah, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
BAMFORD: Exactly. And General Flynn, when he was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, he was very adamant on increasing enormously the manpower of intelligence. It would be double what they had. And it would have been basically a competition with the CIA, and that's one of the reasons he was fired.
GREENE: Well, that points to a real question then of what we expect from Donald Trump. I mean, we learned so much from the Edward Snowden situation about the NSA and its power to collect information about people around the world and also within the United States. I mean, what will a President Donald Trump mean for those kinds of programs?
BAMFORD: Well, a lot of the restrictions that have been placed on the U.S. use of NSA were executive orders, and they could be just overturned with the use of a pen.
GREENE: So this could be Mike Rogers perhaps going and saying, hey, President-elect Trump, I'm in that group. I'm on board with you.
BAMFORD: Oh, exactly, yeah. So that's why NSA and cyber-command both under the same person are going to be enormously important players in the Trump administration.
GREENE: OK. James Bamford is a columnist for Foreign Policy, and he's the author of "The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA From 9/11 To The Eavesdropping On America." Thanks so much for coming in.
BAMFORD: My pleasure, David.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nsa-admiral-mike-rogers-says-never-had-discussion-about-collusion-donald-trump/
WASHINGTON – Former National Security Agency Director and commander of U.S. Cyber Command Admiral Mike Rogers said in rare public remarks on Tuesday that, contrary to media reports, he "never had a discussion" about collusion with President Trump or other White House officials.
"I've never had a discussion with collusion with the president of the United States," Rogers said. "I've never been directed to do anything, coerced – any time I had a discussion I felt I was able to say, 'Hey, here's my view on that,'" Rogers said, "I'm very comfortable."
Asked specifically about reports in May 2017 that Mr. Trump had asked Rogers and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats to publicly deny evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, Rogers said, "I was never asked that."
He added with characteristic acerbity that if he spent his time correcting media reports, "I'd never get anything done."
Rogers declined to comment when moderator Nicolle Wallace pressed him on further details from the Washington Post's original story on the conversations between Mr. Trump and his intelligence chiefs, including whether an NSA official took contemporaneous notes about Rogers' conversation with Mr. Trump.
"No comment," he said on stage with three other former intelligence officials at an event called "Secrets, Presidents and Dissent," held at George Mason University's Schar School of Policy and Government.
Rogers, who retired from his dual-hatted role and the Navy on June 1 after serving during both the Obama and Trump administrations, also said he wished Mr. Trump had pushed back more firmly on Russian president Vladimir Putin during the Helsinki summit held in July.
"I thought there was an opportunity there that I wish we had taken advantage of," Rogers said. "I thought that could have sent a very powerful message."
Rogers also indicated that the Trump administration had granted Cyber Command additional authorities to combat Russian attacks, meaningfully updating his testimony before the Senate Armed Service Committee in February.
"You can tell over time we were moving in what I thought was a very positive direction, definitely," he said. "The leadership clearly was part of that… in the sense of formally directing change."
"I was glad to see the broad direction that we were moving in, I'm not going to pretend for a minute it's perfect by any stretch of the imagination," he added.
Rogers was an outlier among the event's other panelists, who included former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former career CIA analyst Phil Mudd. Apart from Rogers, all of the panelists signed letters, circulated among former senior intelligence officials, protesting Mr. Trump's decision last month to revoke former CIA director John Brennan's security clearance.
Brennan calls Trump's denial of Russia collusion "hogwash"
Hayden called the president's move "punitive action for political dissent," adding that it was "pretty easy" to get signatures. (Nearly 200 intelligence and national security officials signed two separate letters protesting the president's move.)
"I felt it was my duty, my obligation, to speak up," Clapper said, though he acknowledged receiving "blowback" from both intelligence and military officials.
For his part, Rogers said he "chose not to" sign a letter – despite agreeing with the fundamental premise that citizens are entitled to express their views – out of concerns about the effectiveness of the measure and whether it had the potential to complicate the work of currently-serving intelligence officials.
"Pouring gasoline on a fire now is not going to reduce the flame," he said. "And we've got enough fires burning right now, guys; we've got to focus on what are the outcomes we've got to achieve as a nation."
Rumble going public, congrats Dan!
https://rumble.com/vq3a4f-breaking-.html
BREAKING 🚨🔥
The Dan Bongino Show
Published December 1, 2021 19,253 Views