Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 8:04 p.m. No.111250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

[keep in mind Apotex makes generic HCQ]

 

Canada #26 >>>/qresearch/15192133

 

Police Ask for Help to Identify Suspect in Sherman Murders

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/police-ask-for-help-to-identify-suspect-in-sherman-murders_4156751.html

 

Toronto police are asking for the public’s help to identify a suspect in the murders of billionaire philanthropists Barry and Honey Sherman.

 

Det. Sgt. Brandon Price says police have not been able to rule out one individual who was captured on surveillance video around the time of the murders on the evening of Dec. 13, 2017.

 

The founder of the generic pharmaceutical company Apotex and his wife were killed inside their Toronto home.

 

Investigators have said autopsy results showed the pair died by “ligature neck compression.”

 

Police have also said there were no signs of a break-in.

 

Price says the individual walks into the area of the Sherman house, which isn’t captured by video, and stays there a while before leaving.

 

“We have been unable to determine what this individual’s purpose was in the neighbourhood,” Price said.

 

“This invidividual’s actions are highly suspicious.”

 

Late last year, investigators said a person of interest had been identified in the case, but so far, no arrests have been announced.

 

The family offered a reward of up to $10 million for information that would help solve the case that made international headlines.

 

It also hired its own team of private investigators to look into the homicides.

 

Price said video analysis shows the individual is 5’6 to 5’9 tall, but they are unable to say the individual’s, sex, race, or other identifiers.

 

The video shows the individual walking with an unusual gait in his right leg.

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 8:37 p.m. No.111269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1270 >>1271 >>1307

Danish Barge Involved in Collision Starts to Sink

Reuters

December 15, 2021

By Johan Ahlander

 

STOCKHOLM, Dec 15 (Reuters) – A Danish ship involved in a collision off the Swedish coast that left one crew member dead and another missing has started to take on water and may soon sink, the Swedish Coast guard said on Wednesday.

 

At least one person, a Danish crew member from the 55-meter barge Karin Hoj, died in the collision with the 90-meter Scot Carrier, which occurred in fog and darkness off the Danish island of Bornholm in the early hours of Monday.

 

Karin Hoj capsized from the collision but remained afloat, and was towed to shallow water where it was searched. It has now started to take in more water and an unknown quantity of oil has leaked from the barge.

 

“The ship sinking is not something we wanted but have been prepared for,” the Coast Guard said in a statement. “We are now working to limit the oil spill.”

 

It added the ship would still be salvaged but that the process would take longer if it sank.

 

A Swedish prosecutor said earlier on Wednesday that a Croatian national and crew member of the Scot Carrier had been released although he remained under investigation in connection with the incident.

 

A British crew member, held over the collision on several counts including causing death through negligence, remains in custody, Public Prosecutor Tomas Olvmyr said in a statement.

 

A lawyer for the Croatian crew member said he welcomed the decision and denied any wrongdoing. The lawyer for the British citizen declined to comment.

 

The prosecutor said on Tuesday both crew members were found after the collision to be over the legal limit for alcohol.

 

The collision triggered a large rescue operation, which led to the discovery of the dead body of one of the two Danish barge crew members in the hull of the vessel. The other crew member remains missing.

 

Scotline, which owns the Scot Carrier, said in a statement on Tuesday that the crew and company were co-operating fully with the investigation. (Reporting by Niklas Pollard and Johan Ahlander; Editing by Simon Johnson, Gareth Jones, Alexandra Hudson)

 

https://gcaptain.com/danish-barge-involved-in-collision-starts-to-sink/

 

Pic:

Coast guard crews work next to the sinking Danish cargo ship Karin Hoej, whose forehead protrudes from the water, off the beach at Tobisvik, north of Simrishamn, Sweden, December 15, 2021. Johan Nilsson/TT News Agency via REUTERS

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 8:41 p.m. No.111273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

>>111268

Greta Thunberg was born in Sweden on Friday, January 3, 2003 (Generation Z). She is 18 years old and is a Capricorn.

She has over 1.9 million followers on Twitter. She was named by Time Magazine as one of the world’s 25 most influential teenagers in December 2018. She addressed the United Nations Climate Change Conference that same month.

 

She was diagnosed as a young girl with OCD, Asperger syndrome, and selective mutism. She later decided not to attend school until the 2018 Swedish general elections in August 2018 in response to a heat wave and wildfires. The education details are not available at this time. Please check back soon for updates. Greta Thunberg is a member of Richest Celebrities and Activists.

 

https://www.celebsmoney.com/net-worth/greta-thunberg/

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 8:45 p.m. No.111274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

>>111272

From the article in previous bread:

 

The barge was sailing from Sodertalje in Sweden to Nykobing Falster in southern Denmark, while the Scot Carrier was sailing to Montrose on Scotland’s east coast.

 

The British ship’s owner Scotline said it could not comment on details but was assisting local authorities.

 

The SMA said the Danish vessel was empty of cargo and it was unclear what if anything the British ship was carrying.

 

https://gcaptain.com/two-missing-after-collision-off-sweden-criminal-probe-underway/

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 8:58 p.m. No.111275   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1276 >>1307

Drewry: Four Potential Supply Chain Disruptors to Watch For In 2022

The Loadstar

December 15, 2021

 

By Mike Wackett (The Loadstar) –

 

The fractious relationship between ocean carriers and their freight forwarder and NVOCC customers is seen as one of four key disrupters to the supply chain next year, by maritime consultant Drewry.

 

“We are starting to see that some ocean carriers are withdrawing from NVOCC relationships and others making it difficult for NVOs to offer carrier-like fixed-contract rates to shippers under preferential ‘named account’ terms agreed in advance with ocean carriers,” it said.

 

Several forwarding contacts have told The Loadstar they have been unable to secure rate agreements from the lines for January on the Asia-North Europe and transatlantic routes.

 

“Our account manager seems to have gone to ground – 18 months ago we couldn’t get rid of him, now he’s constantly unavailable and doesn’t reply to our e-mails,” said a director of one UK-based NVOCC.

 

Another forwarder said all he got back from his account manager was “excuses” for not quoting January rates, and that the stock answer from carriers was: “Let’s wait until after CNY.”

 

As a consequence, small, and even some mid-sized, forwarders and NVOCCs are unable to offer any guidance on next year’s freight charges to their shipper customers.

 

The fear from this situation is that it will force many smaller shippers to, at best, defer their orders or, in some cases, abandon their product orderbooks altogether, given the uncertainty in the market and the risk that lower-value imports will become unsustainable.

 

Moreover, as a ‘second threat’ to the supply chain in 2022, Drewry also sees the risk of contract disputes involving bigger shippers that have sufficient volume to negotiate long-term deals with carriers.

 

“More BCOs – even the largest ones – will have to accept the new reality of the market: you cannot expect to ship 10 containers one week, 50 containers the next and hope to get 100% capacity for both weekly volumes,” said Drewry.

 

“Carriers are already telling BOs that their capacity in 2022 will be the contractual MQC [minimum quantity commitment] a year ‘divided by 52’,” said the consultant.

 

As a result, disputes about carrier ‘dead freight’ charges for slots not used – more often only seen on the charter market – will arise, as they will when weekly volumes are in excess of the MQC.

 

“Disputes will spread in 2022 about how to deal with excess volume above weekly MQC, and deficit volume below weekly MQC, and about associated penalty clauses,” said Drewry.

 

Meanwhile, the consultant warned shippers on the transpacific using US west coast ports, to be prepared for possible supply chain disruptions around the longshoremen contract renewal negotiations in the first quarter.

 

“For BCOs with long memories of earlier disputes, now is the time to look at alternative routes to avoid US west coast ports,” said Drewry.

 

And the fourth – and constant – threat to the supply chain next year listed by the consultant is, of course, the pandemic.

 

“China’s current zero-tolerance Covid policy makes it particularly likely to shut down – and without prior warning – more secondary ports, more barge operations and more feeder operations, as new cases arise,” said Drewry.

 

“Further lockdown measures in other countries, triggered by new Covid variants or pandemic waves, also cannot be ruled out,” it added.

 

https://gcaptain.com/drewry-four-potential-supply-chain-disruptors-to-watch-for-in-2022/

 

[Non-vessel-operating common carrier is company providing point-to-point international transport of goods although it does not necessarily operate or own transport vehicles or equipment. NVCCOs will commonly contract with a shipper to move goods from the exporter´s premises to the importer´s premises and will issue their own door-to-door transport document, although they will in fact sub-contract the different stages of the transport chain to various road haulers and ocean carriers.]

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 9:30 p.m. No.111282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

U.S. Navy Plans to Finish Separating Non-Vaccinated Sailors by June

Published Dec 15, 2021 10:00 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

The U.S. Navy is moving full steam ahead on its plans to separate servicemembers who refuse to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.

 

“In order to ensure a fully vaccinated force, U.S. Navy policy is, first, that all Navy service members receive the vaccine as directed and, second, that any who refuse the vaccine be processed for separation at the earliest possible opportunity,” said Vice Adm. John B. Nowell, Jr., the chief of naval personnel, in a message to the fleet.

 

Though the deadline for getting the vaccine has passed, Nowell left the door open for refusers to change their minds. If they should decide to start a course of vaccination during the separation process, the Navy's COVID Consolidated Disposition Authority (CCDA) will generally pause or halt the proceedings.

 

“While the vast majority of Navy service members have already received the vaccine, it remains in the interest of the Navy to encourage remaining Navy service members to become fully vaccinated as soon as possible and, at such time, consider them for retention," he said.

 

Those who continue to refuse the vaccine can expect to see their separation proceedings accelerated in order to “maximize speed and equity in achieving a fully vaccinated force,” Nowell said.

 

The disposition of refusers' cases will vary by how long they have been in the Navy and their status. Sailors who are already on track to end their first six years of service by June 1, 2022 will not be processed for separation, and will end their Navy careers at that point. Those in the middle of their first six years can expect an honorable discharge without further hearings; at the other end of the spectrum, those who are planning for retirement or separation by June 1 can request to have their departure accelerated. In exchange, they will generally be granted an honorable discharge.

 

Graduates of the U.S. Naval Academy and the NROTC program who have not completed their service requirements will be required to repay their educational expenses if they are separated for vaccine refusal.

 

The U.S. Navy has shown a strong commitment to adding the COVID-19 vaccine to its long list of servicemember vaccination requirements. The sailors deployed on its ships and submarines live together in cramped conditions for weeks or months, and a COVID outbreak on board disrupts operations, with implications for national defense. However, top leadership has also signaled that it would like to retain the small number of personnel who have so far turned down vaccination.

 

“Let me be clear up front: We want every sailor to receive the vaccine and stay Navy,” said Rear Adm. James Waters III, director of military personnel, plans and policy, at a press conference on Tuesday. “If a sailor gets their shot, we will honor that and make every effort to retain them.”

 

https://maritime-executive.com/article/u-s-navy-plans-to-finish-separating-non-vaccinated-sailors-by-june

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 9:33 p.m. No.111283   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1284 >>1307

Austal USA Completes Agreement to Set Up New Shop in San Diego

Published Dec 15, 2021 10:28 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

Austal USA has closed on a deal with Marine Group Boat Works to take over the lease for a small dockyard in National City, just south of San Diego. The 15-acre site will give Austal's growing service division a base at the home port of the Austal-built Independence-class of Littoral Combat Ships.

 

Austal is acquiring a newly-built floating drydock for the yard, which will allow it to offer full services for small surface combatants, U.S. Coast Guard cutters and similar vessels. After the transfer, Marine Group Boat Works will consolidate its commercial and superyacht repair business at its second yard in neighboring Chula Vista.

 

"When the dry dock is delivered we will be able to provide the Navy a highly capable full-service repair facility located in the homeport of San Diego,” said Austal USA President Rusty Murdaugh. “We know how valuable this additional repair facility is to our customers, the Navy, Coast Guard, and Military Sealift Command, and we are ready to meet the growing demand."

 

Austal has the Independence-class at front of mind as it makes plans for the new site. A service center in San Diego will allow the Independence hulls to come in for OEM repairs at their home port, without having to transit to another location - saving fuel and time.

 

Austal holds multiple service contracts for both series of Littoral Combat Ships, including the Marinette-built Freedom-class. In addition to the new site in San Diego, Austal maintains a service center near its newbuild yard in Mobile, as well as an overseas site in Singapore.

 

The U.S. Navy is phasing out future production of both of the lightly-armed LCS classes in favor of a conventional frigate, the Constellation-class, which will be built at Fincantieri's Marinette yard. To bid on future new construction opportunities, Austal is adapting its aluminum-centered production yard to incorporate a new focus on steel, reflecting the Navy's acquisition priorities.

 

https://maritime-executive.com/article/austal-usa-completes-agreement-to-set-up-new-shop-in-san-diego

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 9:37 p.m. No.111284   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

>>111283 (me)

Monday, January 4, 2021

Constellation Class Frigate - Success or Just Not Failure?

 

ComNavOps has often noted that the Navy, as an institution, seems utterly incapable of learning lessons regardless of how painful and obvious those lessons are. For example, concurrency has been proven to be an unmitigated failure time after time and yet it continues to be a cornerstone of Navy acquisition programs … which continue to fail.

 

 

Well, the Navy has managed to semi-learn one semi-lesson and that is to avoid bad press. It would be much, much better if they learned one of the lessons related to warship design, firepower, project management, cost control, requirements creep, or any of a hundred other valuable lessons but they didn’t. The only lesson they’ve learned is to avoid bad press.

 

 

How do you avoid bad press, you ask? Well, if you’re the Navy, you make sure that the next ship you build has already been built by someone else, in the past. This both minimizes risk and allows you to blame some other builder/country if things go badly.

 

 

Let’s be honest and acknowledge that this approach does reduce the degree of programmatic risk and, therefore, increases the chances for apparent success. Why do I use the qualifier ‘apparent’? Well, it’s because the program won’t be an actual success, even if everything works perfectly - and it won’t! It will be a success only in the sense that it may not generate bad press and be an out and out embarrassment. Well, wait a minute, now. The Fincantieri FREMM frigate that the Navy frigate will be based on is a proven success, isn’t it? So, why wouldn’t the US Navy version also be a success?

 

 

Well, consider this … the FREMM design dates back to the early 2000’s, making the design nearly two decades old by now and it will be three decades old, or older, by the time the first few US Navy frigates will enter actual service (scheduled delivery 2026, IOC around 2030 – and schedules always slip). Can a 30+ year old ship design really be called a success?

 

 

Consider the issue of stealth. When the FREMM was first designed, it may have been considered stealthy but by today’s standards, its appearance would suggest that it is only marginally stealthy, like the Burke. Is a brand new ship that will become our front line surface combat ship as the Burkes are replaced by unmanned vessels, really a success if it’s only marginally stealthy?

 

 

Consider the Navy’s actual needs. This one may be somewhat debatable but ComNavOps has laid out the very clear case that the Navy needs a small, dedicated ASW corvette (or minesweeper or any of a dozen other ship types) far more than a mini-Burke. Is a brand new ship that is, at best, far down the needs list really a success?

 

 

Consider cost and performance. We all (except the Navy) know that the frigate is going to cost $1B+ which pushes it into the conceptual ‘half the performance for two thirds the cost’ region. Is that really a success?

 

 

Okay, all the above are legitimate reasons why the frigate program can’t be a success no matter how well it manages to avoid bad press but those are not the real reasons why it can’t be a success. The real reason is because the design is already obsolete and fails to deliver the new capabilities that are needed to fight future wars.

 

 

We’ve seen that technology – and, hence, future war – has changed radically just in the last few years and has changed even more so over the last three decades that will have elapsed by the time the first frigates enter service. Consider the developments and advances in combat technology since 2000 with the advent of drones, swarms, artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced stealth, advanced stealth detection, advanced multi-sensor guidance systems for missiles, anti-ship ballistic missiles, hypersonic projectiles and missiles, lasers, rail guns, advanced SSK submarines, and many dozens of other technologies. In order to fight a future war with those technologies, either for us or against us or both, we need new ships designed from the start to use, or defend against, those technologies. The FREMM design has none of those capabilities. Why would it? It was designed almost 20 some years ago when those technologies didn’t exist.

 

More:

https://navy-matters.blogspot.com/2021/01/constellation-class-frigate-success-or.html

Anonymous ID: e3c027 Dec. 15, 2021, 9:57 p.m. No.111286   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1307

General Research #19230 >>>/qresearch/15200566

 

Smollett special prosecutor filed motion to have his full report made public.I’m told it might contain politically damaging material about how Kim Foxx’s office is run. Hearing Monday in front of Judge Toomin.

 

https://twitter.com/MattFinnFNC