Things may get interesting

General Research #19700 >>>/qresearch/15578675

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/02/08/insider-leak-canadian-federal-police-likely-to-begin-mass-arrests-in-ottawa-very-soon/

Insider Leak, Canadian Federal Police Likely to Begin Mass Arrests in Ottawa Very Soon

February 8, 2022 | sundance |

The Ottawa Freedom Convoy protests are exposing too many hypocrisies of the leftist Canadian government and their faux conservative opposition. It is only a matter of time before both wings of the Federal UniParty vulture known as Parliament sanction an aggressive federal response.

An insider within the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), essentially the Canadian federal police force, has leaked some of the details. The leaked plan as outlined in this video warning {Direct Rumble Link} does seem to be authentic and aligns with the statements from federal ministers inside the administration of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Previously Ottawa Police Chief Peter Sloly said his agency was working with RCMP officials “collecting financial, digital, vehicle registration, driver identification, insurance status and other related evidence.” Additionally, Justin Trudeau’s Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino stated that U.S. and Canadian intelligence units had been cooperating to identify targets within the protest. Federal agents have also been working undercover to gather information about the truckers and their supporters.

From the video of the leaked plan, the process is straightforward:

♦ Disable cell phone communication. Prevent communication and livestreaming.

♦ Add additional resources to raid the truckers, selecting key targets first.

♦ Remove arrested individuals to the Landsdown processing center. Dissident Detention Camp.

♦ Multiple Agency coordination including RCMP, POU, and local police departments.

♦ Timeline between now and Friday.

General Research #19700 >>>/qresearch/15578725

Gov. Ron DeSantis Speaks Out on Trump Rumors

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis responded to rumors that he and former President Donald Trump are embroiled in a behind-the-scenes feud, saying such reports and suggestions are “total bunk.”

“Donald Trump’s a friend of mine. He is proud when people do well, and it’s not just me, but obviously, he’s a Florida resident, and he appreciates the job that we’ve done,” the Republican governor told Fox News in a Tuesday interview from Tallahassee. “He’s told me that many times, not only with helping with the election but just how we govern the state.”

There has been speculation that DeSantis, who is popular among Trump’s voter base, could potentially run for president in 2024. In previous interviews, the governor has demurred on the possibility, and he’s also not commented extensively on whether he would run as Trump’s vice-presidential candidate if the former president runs in 2024.

Trump “wants to see Republicans doing well,” DeSantis added in Tuesday’s interview. “And I think when media is trying to act like he’s upset at me for doing well, I think that’s total bunk. I think they’re just making it up.”

He continued, “And I think he’s somebody that wants to see, you know, not just Republicans do well, but people that are actually going to stand and fight do well across the board. Obviously, Florida is an important state, the third-largest state in the country, and really us and Texas are the two biggest states that have sizable Republican footprints, and so we’re proud of that, and we’re going to keep it going.”

DeSantis, in his interview, suggested that Democrats and some mainstream media outlets are trying to suggest there is tension within the GOP because “they know the Democrats are in for a shellacking in 2022” during the midterm elections. Generally, the party of the president tends to lose seats during the midterms, while Democrats currently hold thin majorities in both the House and Senate.

https://www.ntd.com/gov-ron-desantis-speaks-out-on-trump-rumors_737611.html

Well now:

General Research #19700 >>>/qresearch/15578760

NEW: COVID-19 vaccine production quietly suspended at Johnson & Johnson

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1491128958540296193

General Research #19701 >>>/qresearch/15579704

Kekkity for sure!

https://twitter.com/TimJDillon/status/1490752435459178501?s=20&t=zm4zHonIFsgauk3d6x7Pug

General Research #19701 >>>/qresearch/15579903

The White House Now Says It Never Really Wanted Lockdowns

Last Friday, a reporter asked White House press secretary Jen Psaki to respond to the Johns Hopkins covid study showing lockdowns provided no real benefit in terms of disease prevention.

In response, Psaki dodged addressing the study directly, but then pivoted to claiming that the Biden administration had never pushed lockdowns.

“We are not pushing lockdowns,” she insisted.

“We’ve not been pro-lockdown - most of the lockdowns actually happened under the previous President.”

We have now reached the point in the media and political narrative where the party of lockdowns realizes lockdowns are increasingly unpopular and so now claims it never supported lockdowns at all.

But how can Psaki get away with saying this?

We all know that Joe Biden has always supported lockdowns. Well, that's not quite it, and she's not completely wrong. By the time Biden was actually sworn in as president, he had already stopped pushing for lockdowns as a continued anticovid option.

On the other hand, it is certainly true that as late as early November 2020, high-ranking Biden advisors were still holding up lockdowns as a possibility that fall and winter. For example, on November 11, 2020, Dr. Michael Osterholm, a member of Biden’s Covid-19 Advisory Board, suggested the country might require a “lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks” and recommended the US government spend additional trillions to “pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for individual workers.”

Osterholm also referenced an August 2020 column he cowrote with Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari in which the authors concluded, “To be effective, the lockdown has to be as comprehensive and strict as possible.”

For his part, Biden was keeping lockdowns very much on the table at least as late as August 2020.

Biden declared in a joint interview with Kamala Harris that if covid numbers increased again “I would shut it down. I would listen to the scientists…. We’re going to do whatever it takes to save lives.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/white-house-now-says-it-never-really-wanted-lockdowns

General Research #19701 >>>/qresearch/15579926

Dem governor confronted for evidence to prove mask mandates in schools were ever 'necessary.' But he has only talking points.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper confronted New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) Monday over what data ever supported forcing schoolchildren to wear face masks.

What is the background?

Murphy announced on Monday that New Jersey would eliminate its mask mandate for students and school employees. The mandate will be gone by the second week of March.

The Democratic governor described the announcement as a "huge step toward normalcy" and "an acknowledgment that we can responsibly live with this thing," according to the New York Times.

What happened on CNN?

In light of Murphy's announcement, Tapper had one question for Murphy: What definitive data supported mask mandates for schoolchildren in the first place?

"Have you seen evidence that these mask mandates have been necessary?" Tapper asked. "That the spread and mortality rates in states where they didn't have mask mandates were far worse than in places where they did have mask mandates like New Jersey?"

In response, Murphy said "there is no question" that forcing schoolchildren to wear face masks "has been a very smart public health step," but Murphy did not actually cite any data supporting his assertion.

"I think we've had just over 2,600 cases of students with COVID positive since the beginning of the school year. That's out of 1.4 million kids," Murphy said. "So, it is a pretty stark piece of evidence, I think, that this is absolutely worked."

Case numbers, of course, are not a reliable data point proving the efficacy of face masks. In fact, the Atlantic noted recently that a claim from the CDC "that schools without mask mandates have triple the risk of COVID outbreaks" is based on, at best, "very shaky science."

Tapper, therefore, pushed Murphy again for an answer.

"But have you seen data that definitively proves that these mask mandates have worked?" Tapper pressed. "I mean, the numbers you just presented are impressive. But are they different from the numbers in states where they didn't have mask mandates?"

Murphy, however, had nothing definitive to say and regurgitated pandemic talking points.

"Again, I know Jersey the best. But I'm highly confident and I'm sure our health officials will, could say it definitively," Murphy said. "There is no question it worked. There is no question getting vaccinated, getting boosted, and wearing masks indoors have all been positive public health steps, compared to the absence of any of those things in the alternative."

https://youtu.be/JtsIHR6Rg-w

https://www.theblaze.com/news/jake-tapper-confronts-dem-governor-over-evidence-to-prove-that-mask-mandates-in-schools-have-been-necessary

General Research #19701 >>>/qresearch/15579941

US Army releases its Climate Strategy

By U.S. Army Public Affairs | February 8, 2022

WASHINTGON — The U.S. Army announces the release of its first Climate Strategy that guides decision making in response to threats from climate that affect installation and unit sustainability, readiness, and resilience. The strategy directs how the Army will maintain its strategic advantage through deliberate efforts to reduce future climate impacts and risks to readiness and national security.

Experts have shown that climate change increases worldwide drought and insecurity, which places demands on fragile states and contributes to food scarcity, migration, and security concerns, and threatens U.S. national security interests and defense objectives. As a guide for future decisions, this strategy is the next step in the Army’s decades-long effort to combat climate change in support of national security interests.

"The time to address climate change is now. The effects of climate change have taken a toll on supply chains, damaged our infrastructure, and increased risks to Army Soldiers and families due to natural disasters and extreme weather,” said Secretary of the Army, Christine Wormuth. “The Army must adapt across our entire enterprise and purposefully pursue greenhouse gas mitigation strategies to reduce climate risks. If we do not take action now, across our installations, acquisition and logistics, and training, our options to mitigate these risks will become more constrained with each passing year."

The Army developed its Climate Strategy as a roadmap of actions that will enhance unit and installation readiness and resilience in the face of climate-related threats. Changing climate conditions requires the Army to meet new operational challenges, expand disaster response missions, and address risks to our people and lands.

These Army-wide efforts include enhancing resilience and sustainability on our installations, reducing sustainment demand, and preparing a climate-ready force with the appropriate knowledge, skills, concepts, and plans necessary to operate in a climate-altered world.

The Army will remain the dominant land fighting force by adapting to changing global conditions including climate change. This strategy will position our installations and supply chains to better withstand extreme weather, improve our training relevancy to a changing world, and our Soldiers will fulfill their missions under the harshest conditions.

https://www.army.mil/article/253754/us_army_releases_its_climate_strategy

General Research #19701 >>>/qresearch/15579945

TINA PETERS ARRESTED

https://twitter.com/CBSDenver/status/1491162688902230018

>>118842

Consider theatrical contact lenses, mess his mind up

General Research #19703 >>>/qresearch/15581533

Pelosi under fire for spending nearly $500K on private jet flights

While publicly advocating for limiting emissions in the hopes of stemming climate change, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi simultaneously spent nearly half a million dollars on private flights over the past year, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission first reported by Fox News.

Pelosi’s team reported expenditures to two private flight companies – Advanced Aviation Team in Virginia and Clay Lacy Aviation in California – that totaled $489,164.85 between October 2020 and December 2021.

During that span, Pelosi spoke at the COP26 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, Scotland. There, she invoked religion in advocating for global changes in emissions standards.

“I believe this is God’s creation, and we have a moral obligation to be good stewards,” Pelosi said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-under-fire-for-spending-nearly-500k-on-private-jet-flights/ar-AATCO1T

>>118844

Maybe these then