VIDEO: Bongino: This is how the left executes censorship (YouTube)
talking about 4am talking points.. "The Blue Stack" alliance of everyone from "banks to activists to contro you"
You see last night PDJT's twatt that said Maggot Haberman (could be tongue in cheek, but dont think it was) so OT vs IE
Will keep eyes on thanks!
ES is of course Eric Snowden or Eric Schmidt.. dasting..
Fugg yes he is!!
https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/1492873764945727496
PapiTrump ReTwTT: LauraIngraham (Twatt)Finally the walls are closing in on the Clinton campaign. Get the popcorn ready.
9:50 EST
950
>>678151
Trust the plan.
Full control.
Q
-----
Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at ā¦.png
Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at ā¦.png
>>678189
pompeo is trumps guy
as head of CIA gather intel on all the shady cia shit we've done both here and overseas
moves to state dept to use that intel to help free the world from the cia bullshitt
-----
>>678226
TRUST KANSAS.
Q
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1492916313794265089
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) IT'S TREASON!!! #TrumpWasRight
"I want to stay out of it otherwise it will look political" (This should be common sense. -Q)
12:39 EST
1239
@algore
Today is Earth Day.
Did you forget?
Do you feel safe?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/al-gore-has-thrived-as-green-tech-investor/2012/10/10/1dfaa5b0-0b11-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html?utm_term=.00a0de2fb3ae
Q
https://web.archive.org/web/20180913183518/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/al-gore-has-thrived-as-green-tech-investor/2012/10/10/1dfaa5b0-0b11-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html?utm_term=.00a0de2fb3ae
Before a rapt audience, Al Gore flashed slides on a giant screen bearing the logos of 11 clean energy companies he predicted could help slow climate change.
āWe canāt wait. .ā.ā. We have a planetary emergency,ā the former vice president told industry leaders and scientists at the 2008 conference. āHere are just a few of the investments that I personally think make sense.ā
Today, several of those clean tech firms are thriving, including a solar energy start-up and a Spanish utility company that has dotted rural America with hundreds of wind turbines.
Al Gore is thriving, too.
The man who was within sight of the presidency 12 years ago has transformed himself, becoming perhaps the worldās most renowned crusader on climate change and a highly successful green-tech investor.
VIEW GRAPHIC
Gore's green investments
Just before leaving public office in 2001, Gore reported assets of less than $2 million; today, his wealth is estimated at $100 million.
Gore charted this path by returning to his longtime passion ā clean energy. He benefited from a powerful resume and a constellation of friends in the investment world and in Washington. And four years ago, his portfolio aligned smoothly with the agenda of an incoming administration and its plan to spend billions in stimulus funds on alternative energy.
The recovering politician was pushing the right cause at the perfect time.
Fourteen green-tech firms in which Gore invested received or directly benefited from more than $2.5 billion in loans, grants and tax breaks, part of President Obamaās historic push to seed a U.S. renewable-energy industry with public money.
Over the course of his metamorphosis, Gore became an environmentalist hero with release of his award-winning film and book warning of carbon emissions dangerously overheating the planet. He founded an investment firm devoted in part to backing green-minded companies and later partnered with a leading venture capital firm to invest in clean energy start-ups.
āWe have work to do!ā Gore recently exhorted an audience while showing his trademark slide show about melting polar ice caps and the urgent need to stop burning so much oil and gas.
That declaration, his friends say, captures his obsession ā heās unable to rest in his self-appointed mission to save the planet.
āMaybe thereās someone as knowledgeable and passionate about climate change. I just havenāt met that person,ā said Orin Kramer, a leading New York hedge fund manager, friend of Gore and top Democratic campaign bundler. āHis schedule is intensely busy, and my sense is he lives a life that profoundly reflects his values and passions.ā
In building his new career, Goreās name has become ensnared in a broader criticism from Republicans, who put him among political allies they say the Obama administration has unjustly enriched with stimulus and clean-energy funding.
In last weekās presidential debate, Romney criticized the $90 billion that went to promote green technology, saying a number of businesses owned by Obama campaign contributors were winners.
Gore declined to be interviewed, but spokeswoman Betsy McManus said he had not asked the administration for support for any companies in which he had invested. āFor almost 40 years, he has consistently advocated for the rapid deployment of renewable energy and other sustainability technologies,ā she said. āHis investments are consistent with his beliefs.ā
White House officials have rejected charges of favoritism.
āThese are merit-based decisions made by professionals with the relevant policy expertise,ā White House spokesman Eric Schultz said.
One of the rare times Gore addressed the questions, at a congressional hearing in 2009, Republicans had suggested that Obamaās agenda appeared destined to help him become the nationās first ācarbon billionaire.ā
Gore bristled when Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) asked if he stood to profit from his investments and political connections.
āI believe that the transition to a green economy is good for our economy and good for all of us, and I have invested in it,ā he said. āAnd, congresswoman, if you believe that the reason I have been working on this issue for 30 years is because of greed, you donāt know me.ā
Gore 2.0
Gore, 63, divides most of his time now between his home in Nashville and a St. Regis tower apartment in San Francisco, where he can visit his West Coast investment partnership and see his new girlfriend, an environmental activist. (He and his wife of 40 years, Tipper, separated two years ago. She lives in the $8.9 million mansion they bought in 2010 outside Santa Barbara.)
His schedule includes international travel as well, often delivering speeches for fees that have reached as high as $175,000.
It is a huge shift from a decade ago, when Gore was considered a Washington lifer. The Tennessean was largely raised in the nationās capital as the son of a U.S. senator. As his father had hoped, Albert Arnold Gore Jr. went on to serve in office for 24 years: 16 years in Congress and eight as vice president under President Bill Clinton.
His loss to George W. Bush in 2000 was personally devastating, and Gore went into a kind of mourning, friends say.
āThe way he coped with the 2000 disaster was to throw himself into this new work,ā said Elaine Kamarck, a former Clinton aide and friend of Gore who was chief policy adviser on his 2000 campaign. āHe just didnāt lick his wounds and go away.ā
Gore eventually turned the painful experience into a punchline. He didnāt miss a beat when a conference organizer in 2008 confessed it āhurtsā to think of the environmental agenda that could have been, if only Gore had won.
āYou have no idea,ā he said in a deep baritone of mock grief.
By then, Gore had won a Nobel Prize and Oscar for his 2006 book and movie, āAn Inconvenient Truth.ā Supporters had begun hailing him as the single most effective spokesman on the threat of climate change.
With his prize winnings, Gore created the Alliance for Climate Protection, an advocacy group that ran ads warning of looming climate change. In the process, he gained high-placed admirers and business associates in Silicon Valley.
Gore entered the investment world full time by co-founding Generation Investment Management, a London-based investment firm. He was the type of high-profile partner sought by Goldman Sachs executive David Blood, who had headed Goldmanās $325 billion asset management division and was looking to start a new firm. The pair launched GIM in 2004 to back companies focused on sustainability, including clean energy, water scarcity and poverty.
GIM also invested in established companies such as Colgate Palmolive and John Deere, as well as medical technology, Internet and other businesses. Within three years, the firm was managing $1 billion.
Gore also found himself to be a sought-after star among elite Silicon Valley investors. In late 2007, he became a senior investment partner at one of the worldās most successful venture capital firms, Kleiner Perkins. He was combining forces with longtime friend John Doerr in a joint mission to spur clean tech.
Doerr had won legendary status at Kleiner by betting early on the meteoric rise of Internet start-ups Google and Amazon. But by 2007, he had switched his bets to green energy and vowed to raise $500 million to invest in what he called the next āmother of all markets.ā
Gore and Doerr began comparing notes about start-ups with promise in renewable energy, including biofuels, advanced batteries and solar.
His friends and colleagues say Gore is relishing his new role and has remarked that he feels lucky to be doing something he loves and enjoying financial success.
Kramer, who serves on Goreās climate change advocacy group, said he has watched with amazement as Gore debates obscure research with a room full of scientists.
āHe knows the studies theyāre citing and the three other studies which shed a different light on it,ā Kramer said.
Washington ties
Eight years after losing the presidential race, with Bush in the final stretch of his administration, Gore was working hard to build support in Washington for his cause. By then a rising green investor, he was keenly focused on shaping policy should a Democrat win in 2008.
Before the election, Gore launched a public campaign known as āRepower America,ā aimed at encouraging the public and the next administration to support government investments in clean energy. His Alliance for Climate Protection was running numerous ads, and he delivered speeches laying out his goal that, within 10 years, 100 percent of the nationās electricity should come from clean energy.
āThe future of human civilization is at stake,ā Gore said in a 2008 speech, stressing that such projects would create jobs.
At the same time, Goreās venture partner, Doerr, had been raising money for Democrats to take back the White House, holding big-check receptions with Silicon Valley investors. He and fellow Kleiner partners and spouses donated more than $800,000 to Democrats, much of it for Obama and state efforts to get out the vote.
At GIM, five of Goreās principals, including co-founder David Blood, wrote $130,000 in checks to aid Obamaās bid, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
As Obama was preparing to take office, it was clear his public agenda supporting clean energy aligned with Goreās personal agenda. Obama held a highly publicized meeting with Gore at transition headquarters in Chicago to talk about energy policy. Later, Obama closely echoed several of Goreās talking points and his plan for public investment in clean energy. Obama even adopted Goreās campaign catchphrase for the effort, āRepower America.ā
āThis is a matter of urgency and national security,ā Obama said. āWe have the opportunity now to create jobs all across this country in all 50 states to repower America, to redesign how we use energy and .ā.ā. make us competitive for decades to come ā even as we save the planet.ā
Goreās orbit extended deeply into the administration, with several former aides winning senior clean-energy posts. Among them were Carol Browner, a former Gore political operative who became the presidentās climate change czar, and Ron Klain, Goreās former chief of staff who went to work for Vice President Biden overseeing the stimulus.
Those connections were underscored in October 2009, when Jonathan Silver, under consideration to head the $38 billion Āclean-energy loan program, hosted a party to help Gore raise money for the Alliance for Climate Protection.
Silver invited the Department of Energyās chief financial officer, days before the official was scheduled to meet Silver to discuss the job.
āAt the risk of seeming presumptuous, I want to mention that my wife and I are holding a small event for Al Gore at our home this coming Thursday evening,ā Silver wrote in an e-mail. āI expect there will be about 40 people or so, generally folks we know who are interested in this issue and have the capacity to write significant checks and a couple of others with professional involvement in the topic.ā
Help for a portfolio
Goreās investments coincided with the governmentās largest investment in clean tech. A full 10 percent, estimated at $80 billion to $90 billion, of the 2009 stimulus package was devoted to clean energy.
Like thousands of other companies, those Gore invested in entered the competition for a piece of the pie. (An administration official said more than 80 percent of applicants the first year were turned away.) Several companies in Goreās portfolio emerged as winners. Of the 11 companies he mentioned in his 2008 slide show, nine received or directly benefited from stimulus or clean energy funding.
Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), who chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee and is a leading critic of clean tech funding, said Goreās portfolio āis reflective of a disturbing pattern that those closest to the president have been rewarded with billions of taxpayer dollars .ā.ā. and benefited from the administrationās green bonanza in the rush to spend stimulus cash.ā
Department of Energy officials have noted that many of the funds that went to companies Gore invested in were available to all eligible firms, and some had won funding from the Bush administration.
āDecisions about the competitively awarded grants and loans were made on the merits by career civil servants after a careful review of the applications,ā said Dan Leistikow, director of public affairs at the Department of Energy, which administered the awards.
Gore appeared well-positioned. Generation Investment Management saw its earnings quadruple from 2008 to 2009, although there is no way to know how much can be tied to federal support. GIM reported earnings of $51 million in 2009 available to Gore and his nine partners.
But some of the firms in Goreās portfolio have struggled since winning federal funds. For others, the money was a major boon.
Iberdrola Renovables, a wind subsidiary largely owned by the Spanish electricity giant Iberdrola, received $1.5 billion for 20 wind farms it built across the United States.
The company benefited from a program that had been reshaped by the Obama transition team to award cash grants to defray construction costs for renewable energy plants. The grants, available to any eligible builder, replaced tax credits that had become worthless in the financial crisis. With early warning from the Obama team, Iberdrola and other developers could time construction and qualify for the cash for some plants largely built in 2008 ā before Obama took office.
GIM had invested modest amounts in Iberdrola Renovables in early 2008 but began dramatically increasing its holdings in early 2009, eventually owning 4.2 million shares.
GIM officials declined to comment, citing their policy not to publicly discuss investment strategies.
Iberdrola spokeswoman Jan Johnson credited the Obama program as a savior that came ājust in time,ā helping the company avoid halting construction that was underway in 2008.
The company now has 40 renewable energy plants operating in the United States, and its parent is the worldās largest provider of wind energy.
GIM also invested in Johnson Controls, a long-established Milwaukee company that in August 2009 won the largest award ā $299 million ā in a $2.4 billion program Obama had launched to help firms making electric car batteries.
Goreās investment firm had earlier invested modestly in the company, then ramped up its holdings in late 2008 and held 5.6 million shares by 2009.
The grant to Johnson Controls was meant to help retrofit one plant and build another. But the company has dramatically scaled back, after executives concluded demand for electric cars was far lower than the administration forecast. The factory outfitted with stimulus funds is nearly idle, and plans to build a second plant have been postponed.
Johnson Controls Vice President Alex Molinaroli stressed that the company has tapped just half of the funds it was awarded. He said the program helped build the foundation for a U.S. electric battery industry that could compete internationally when demand picks up.
āWeāll have to wait a long time to see if this was a good investment or not,ā Molinaroli told the Post in 2011.
The companyās decision to pull back, however, will not affect GIMās portfolio. When the investment firm doubled its holdings, shares were as low as $9; GIM sold them from April to December 2009, with prices running from $21 to $26.
Goreās support for companies that also won federal funds is a natural alignment of interests, his friends and partners said. Gore chose to invest in firms with promising technologies, they said, and it makes sense that the administration would choose some of the same firms in hopes of backing successful companies.
āIs he better than averageā at picking the best companies, Kamarck asked. āOf course he is. Why is that a surprise? Heās spent his life studying this sector.ā
Alice Crites contributed to this article.
mod powers basiclaly, the long and short, you can write out longer, why I stay logged in more times than not, I can damn near get whole articles over. I tried to extend out the lines available when MR was new, but I don't know if that had any effect, it may be set globablly and not locally.
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1492907262716915712
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) Hussein Looking in on Trump (climbing windows w/ suction cups)
Mack is naming names.
Big names in H-Wood / Govāt (local/federal).
Proof.
The āStandardā Hotel.
Helicopter crash.
All related.
Future will prove past.
AS.
Feeling ok today?
Why is the MX border / Long Beach Port so important?
Tick TOCK (LLC).
Q
https://web.archive.org/web/20220213190501/https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/
June 5, 2020 UPDATE
Contacted by DNC/Brennan, put software on system, that told it was in fact Seth Rich. I believe Seth understood what had been done, but still went through with the mission to get WL more info on teh server.. the breach was D/L physically, not via the net.. speed of D/L was too great for over the net, but consistent with a physical D/L
Blog update following the release of the testimony by Shawn Henry, CSO and President of CrowdStrike Services, before the House Intelligence Committee that was recently declassified.
What was CrowdStrikeās role in investigating the hack of the DNC?
CrowdStrike was contacted on April 30, 2016 to respond to a suspected breach. We began our work with the DNC on May 1, 2016, collecting intelligence and analyzing the breach. After conducting this analysis and identifying the adversaries on the network, on June 10, 2016 we initiated a coordinated remediation event to ensure the intruders were removed and could not regain access. That remediation process lasted approximately 2-3 days and was completed on June 13, 2016.
Why did the DNC contact CrowdStrike?
The DNC contacted CrowdStrike to respond to a suspected cyber attack impacting its network. The DNC was first alerted to the hack by the FBI in September 2015. According to testimony by DNC IT contractor Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, the FBI attributed the breach to the Russian Government in September 2015 (page 7).
Why did the DNC hire CrowdStrike instead of just working with the FBI to investigate the hack?
The FBI doesnāt perform incident response or network remediation services when organizations need to get back to business after a breach.
CrowdStrike is a leader in protecting customers around the world from cyber threats. It is common for organizations to hire third-party industry experts, like CrowdStrike, to investigate and remediate cyber attacks when they suspect a breach even if they are collaborating with law enforcement. As John Carlin, former Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division at The Department of Justice, testified before the House Intelligence Committee (cited from page 21 of his testimony):
āA lot of ā outside of any political organization, companies, most corporations, they often would use these third party contractors, who they hired through their own counsel, and maximize the control from the point of view of the victim.ā
Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.
Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.
To reference, CrowdStrikeās account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, āCrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network ā COZY BEAR and FANCY BEARā¦. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.ā
This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
The Senate report states on page 48:
āThe Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.ā
Furthermore, in his testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Henry stated the following with regards to CrowdStrikeās degree of confidence that the intrusion activity can be attributed to Russia, cited from page 24:
HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence.
Have any other organizations concluded that Russia was behind the DNC hack?
Yes. CrowdStrikeās conclusion that Russia was behind the DNC hack is supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and also by independent Congressional reports. Most recently, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report in April 2020 that validated the previous conclusions of the Intelligence Community Assessment, published on January 6, 2017, all concluding that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
Page 157 of the Senate report states that the Select Committee on Intelligence āconducted an extensive examination of the intelligence demonstrating Russiaās intrusions into DNC networks.ā Senator Richard Burr (R ā North Carolina), who served as Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time the report was issued, confirmed this finding: āThe Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Communityās conclusions.ā
The Intelligence Community Assessment, published on January 6, 2017 also confirms that Russia was behind the DNC hack, stating on page 2 of the report: āIn July 2015, Russian intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016. This unclassified ODNI report was based on extensive classified intelligence collected by the CIA, NSA, and FBI; the ODNI determined the classified intelligence should not be released in order to protect the sensitive sources and methods by which it was collected.
Itās also worth noting that other security companies, including Fidelis and FireEye have supported CrowdStrikeās analysis.
Does CrowdStrike have evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC network?
Yes. Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration (page 32) and that data had clearly left the network. Also, on page 2, the Intelligence Community Assessment also confirmed that the Russian intelligence agency GRU āhad exfiltrated large volumes of data from the DNC.ā
Did CrowdStrike see in real-time the adversaries exfiltrate data and emails from the DNC network?
No and thatās typical for incident response cases. In the vast majority of cyber investigations, incident responders donāt witness exfiltration in real-time. In fact, often we are called in after theft has taken place. We collect forensics, evidence of prior activity on the network, map where the adversary has gained access and prepare remediation plans.
In this particular case, CrowdStrike saw circumstantial evidence of data exfiltration from the DNC network. As a reference point circumstantial evidence is the type of evidence such as DNA analysis or fingerprints that are fully admissible in courts.
Shawn Henry stated in his testimony that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration (page 32 of the testimony):
āCounsel just reminded me that, as it relates to the DNCā we have indicators that data was exfiltrated. We did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated.ā
and circumstantial evidence that data was taken as he states on page 75 āso there is circumstantial evidence that it was takenā and page 76:
āMR. HENRY: So, to go back, because I think itās important to characterize this. We didnāt have a network sensor in place that saw data leaveā We said that the data Ieft based on the circumstantial evidence. That was a conclusion that we made. when I answered that question, I was trying to be as factually accurateā I want to provide the facts. so I said that we didnāt have direct evidenceā But we made a conclusion that the data left the network.ā
On page 32 of the testimony, Henry also explains that
āWe donāt have video of it happening, but there are indicators that it happenedā and āwe did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated.ā As another reference point, the independent report by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller also cites the theft of documents from the DNC and DCCC on page 40, stating the following:
āOfficers from Unit 26165 stole thousands of documents from the DCCC and DNC networks, including significant amounts of data pertaining to the 2016 U.S. federal elections. Stolen documents included internal strategy documents, fundraising data, opposition research, and emails from the work inboxes of DNC employees.ā
Is it true that part of the exfiltration happened after CrowdStrike was already engaged by the DNC?
This question about the specific timeline of the exfiltration is addressed directly by Shawn Henry in his testimony on page 26.
āMR. HENRY: So the analysis started the first day or two in May, and then that was about 4 to 6 weeks. I think, on June 10th, we started what we call the remediation event. so we collected enough intelligence. We identified where the adversaries were in the environmentā We came up with a remediation plan to say we see them in multiple locations. This ā these are the actions that we need to execute in order to put a new infrastructure in place and to ensure that the adversaries donāt have access to the new infrastructure. So that would have been June 10th when we started. And we did the remediation event over a couple of days.ā
Of note, it is a standard practice in incident response to first coordinate a remediation event to prevent the adversary from doing further damage and following that to fully restore network functionality. We followed industry best practices to accomplish the fastest remediation path for our customer.
On page 27 of Shawn Henryās testimony, he further explains CrowdStrikeās role as incident responders:
āTo be clear, our goal, my goal was to protect the client. We were hired to protect the client. We identified an adversary there. The goal was to make sure that the adversary was removed and the client had a clean environment with which to work.ā
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1492918418697302022
PapiTrumpo ReTwTT: DefiantL's (Twatt) Hypocricy of Hillary Blaming others not headlines blaming her
12:47 EST
1247
>>1158695
Just don't forget the Americans Boss! MAGA!!
>>1158720
Happening now.
Q
>>1158853
Happy hunting!
http://www.un.org/en/auditors/board/faq.shtml
Q
Happy hunting!
http://www.un.org/en/auditors/board/faq.shtml
Q
United Nations ran by China, Chile, & Germany?!
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1492938114599428099
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) Blackhat Bill & Cryin Hillary
14:05 EST
1405
UK NSA Fsurv_LondonPS1
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1492931654385647616
PapiTrumpo ReTwTT: DanScavino (Twatt) Trump Was Right about Everything
13:40 EST
1340
This is why we are here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ia0vu/the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q_and_how/
Q
https://web.archive.org/web/20180511000043/https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ia0vu/the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q_and_how/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180511000043/https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ia0vu/the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q_and_how/
The long and secret info wars against Q and how he stayed alive. You really need to know this and move on.
I promised there would be a follow up to [my post about Q1295] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8hqo5n/q1315_trumps_tweet_confirms_the_q_5_photo_puzzle/?st=jgz6twag&sh=0dceaa85) Be careful who you are following. Here it is. It's a long post but if you are a Q follower, this information is worth knowing.
As many among you already know, Dr. Corsi is just the tip of the iceberg. There are dark forces at work trying to divide us and hijack Qās work and our Movement. I will show you today who these dark forces are and how they are related to Dr. Corsi.
To those who think this issue should be put to rest for the sake of unity, this is my response:
if Q himself has spoken about it [here] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1233188.html#1233458) after having put up with these dark forces trying to undermine him for months, he must have some kind of intel pushing him to react;
A glass of fine wine mixed with water is no longer fine wine and is certainly not water;
When a snake enters the house, there is no time for poetry: you secure the kids, close the doors and do what you have to do.
The Truth has a price my friends and no strong movement in human history has succeeded avoiding the issues challenging its foundations. Roses are beautiful, but they come with thorns. To be safe, we need to know how to hold them. This is why we are here today. We owe it to Trump, we owe it to Q, we owe it to the patriots who have sacrificed their lives for True Freedom, we owe it to ourselves for our efforts to not go to waste and above all, we owe it to the abused children whose lives, safety and freedom depend on the success of our Movement. Isnāt this the ultimate reason we are all here?
Letās get to it.
Qās first days were not easy. At all. Immediately after his first posts on October 2017, a violent information war was launched against him to ridicule him and silence him. All sorts of vicious information war techniques were used against him. I will show you some of them in this post. Q stoically stood still and after 3 months, despite this info-war against him, his audience grew to the point the phenomenon could not be ignored anymore. On December 08 2017, Infowars resorts to inviting Jordan Sather from Destroy the Illusion to talk about Q. Even though Jordanās main field of expertise is secret space programs, free energy and the like he has been following Q on his YT channel and has done an excellent job bridging Q with the masses. When Jordan is invited by Infowars, we can see how proud he is: [tweet] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://twitter.com/Jordan_Sather_/status/939206347928698880).
Letās listen to Jordan and Roger Stoneās conversation until 6:40: [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/iLOveorNUB4?t=215).
Did you catch what Roger Stone is implying? This is the first info-war technique I want to show you. Stone is an old fox, he knows all the subtle communication techniques used in information warfare to swing peopleās opinion and spread confusion. He knows how the subconscious mind works and how it makes an association between a skillfully asked question and its implied response. For clarity, here is Roger Stoneās question: Img1
You see it now? He is implying and subtly instilling in peopleās mind through his timed and insidious question that the Q phenomenon Jordan has described may just be bots or humans hired to limit Infowarsā reach and cut them off from those who follow them. This is Roger Stone essentially saying: āInfowars is a shareholder in the election of the President and we will not accept to lose the leverage we have because of some bot playing on 8chanā. You think itās far-fetched? Bear with meā¦
December 24 2017. For the first time Alex Jones talks about Q. At last. Itās been 3 months! You can find the entire video [here] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6BXPFZjK2s) so nobody can accuse me of taking things out of context. Letās listen to him from 0:54 to 1:56. [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/K6BXPFZjK2s?t=53).
As you can see, Jones starts with Q but immediately shuts him down by saying this: Img2 This information warfare technique is used to zero or reduce the relevancy of the subject: you name the subject (Q), then you immediately replace him in peopleās mind by talking about another person (Zak) with praises and hypertrophy. Then Jones goes into a long verbal journey about Zak, the color of the moon and other irrelevant subjects, beating around the bush, preparing, preparing, until he could finally throw this at his audience (watch until 8:46) [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/K6BXPFZjK2s?t=430).
There are 2 techniques used here. The first one is [Downgrading] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://i.imgur.com/z4ueO91.png). Alex claims to know who Q is, where he get his info, Q is not really high levelā¦ secondarilyā¦ That technique is pretty straightforward.
Did you catch the second one? At 8:19 he says: āso they want to take Trump out in November, but we dodged it, and people go: look Q anon is not right, it didnāt happenā.
Q never said Trump was going to be taken out on November. Alex Jones did. You see how he did it: he lied, then he attributed the lie to Q, then he defends him. This is another information warfare technique consisting of artificially victimizing someone in order to pull his base. You push someone through the balcony, you take the stairs to catch him and then pay for his funeralā¦
But it gets better:
January 5 2018. Alex Jones invites Zak. The YT video title is āHigh Level Intelligence Source Confirms QAnon Is REALā. You can watch the [entire video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmnBywq8zR8) later. Itās a 23 minute video. Despite the title, Q is not mentioned any single time except at the 10th minute when Alex says the following; letās listen until 11:15: [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/tmnBywq8zR8?t=636) .
If you take a look at [this composition] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://i.imgur.com/5SynTxC.png), you realize Alex has obviously explored Qās board. He is ridiculing him and asking people to hold on to Zak, his āreal Q Anonā who is not a āLARPā acting in āFantasy Landā. Unlike Q, his beloved Zak is acting in the āreal worldā. Sounds familiar? Yesā¦ He is echoing his friend Roger Stone! They both talked about it and both have agreed their communication strategy was to convince Q is not real, heās a bot or a hired human LARPING on 8Chan. Of course this strategy has to be implemented covertly in order not to risk any backlash from their audience that may have been following Q. Hence all these sneaky communication and manipulation techniques. After this vicious attack, Alex will never mention Q throughout the interview again. Those who are familiar with subliminal messages understand why the title did not have anything to do with the interview. The title was aiming at subliminally planting in peopleās brains: āThe real QAnon is Zakā.
The next day, commenting on Zakās interview, Owen Shroyer airs a segment titled: āInfowars Own #QAnon Discusses Deep Stateā Img.
Need I say more? You see the problem now?
On January 27 2018, Infowars invites Jordan Sather for the second time. Despite the attacks, Qās movement has grown exponentially so we are hoping to hear Jordanās update on the Q phenomenon. Well, here is the [entire video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK6zi-6X2_0). There is not a single word about Q. Infowars invited him to talk about secret space programs. Not Q. Why is Infowars putting Jordan in the āSecret Space Programā drawer. Why? I will tell you. So that this can happen the next day: Img
Infowars positions Dr. Corsi to be the in-house Q guy. Alex Jones has now realized he could not crush the Q phenomenon. He tried to confuse us, ridicule Q, downgrade him and replace him with Zak, didnāt work. Soā¦ If you canāt fight them, join them. Dr. Corsi, the Infowars Washington Correspondent is now missioned by Alex to lead the containment strategy and infiltrate Q. Notice the title: āWhat is QAnon?ā. Not who. Again, the bot/LARP theory. But there is worse, did you catch it? Letās zoom, look: Imgur.
We clearly read on Infowars YT channel:āDr. Jerome Corsi reveals what QAnon is and how it will be used against the people.ā What do you think this is? Error? No. This is a subliminal message folks. Your eyes will not notice it but your brain sees it. Once this particular message is processed by the subconscious mind, the conscious mind starts to develop defense mechanisms against Q and his message. Welcome to the info wars against Q! It has been Infowars against Q all along. MSM fights Q by trying to ignore him, Infowars fights Q by trying to crash him. Wake up.
Now question: why do you think Alex did not use Jordan instead? Why didnāt he try to hijack Jordanās base instead of starting from scratch with Corsi? Answer: because of this: Img. 4 days before, during the [Infowars Fisa Memo debacle] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.weeklystandard.com/holmes-lybrand/fact-check-did-infowars-release-the-secret-fisa-memo), Jordan showed his independence with this [tweet] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://twitter.com/Jordan_Sather_/status/955970371018108930). Alex Jones realized he was not controllable. Jordan is a real truth fighter. This is why Infowars invited him 3 days after this tweet to talk about what he likes and forget Q. Classic bait & control tactics. Once this bait was offered to Jordan, he could then position Dr. Corsi who would do what he is told about Q. Why? Because of this: Img
Dr. Corsiās YT channel was dead. His last video was published on 2014 and had 2,2k views. As the inactive Infowars DC correspondent who is invited from time to time on Infowars, Dr. Corsi is a vulnerable asset Jones can use to deal with the Q problem. He instructs him to start commenting on Q and to progressively build his crowd based on a business model that will not link him to Infowars. Perfect bone for an inactive asset. How do I know? Letās listen to the following until 1:25: [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/mcL3XKy0I-s?t=29)
Did you catch it? āa number of people who I consider to be very important to me said youād better start looking at thisā. How does that sound to you? āyouād better start looking at thisā. You think it is a professional advice? Now that we know what we know, we know it's not. This is Alex essentially telling him: I tried to contain this thing, didnāt work, youād better get in and take control remotely for us before it gets out of hands. This is how we got Corsi my friends. It has never been about decoding, it has always been about containing. Dr. Corsi is the Infowars Trojan horse sent to the Q Movement. And in exchange of this work, Jones is capitalizing on his vulnerability by allowing him to do his little business. Does Corsi know Jonesā endgame? I donāt believe so. I think he is just being manipulated by someone more intelligent. You know why? Because the next day, on the Hagmman Report, this is what he says, letās listen carefully until 2:22: [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/Dn-nsXSFkls?t=65)
So here the version slightly changes: he decided he would dig into the Q phenomenon after Trumpās executive order. Itās no longer āa number of people who I consider to be very important to me said youād better start looking at thisā. Now itās about trumpās Executive Order. Why is the version changing? You got it: Alex told him he made a mistake at Tracyās interview. He needed to change the story so Alex could remain invisible, working in the shadow. This corrected discrepancy is proof Corsi is just a pawn.
Now letās take a look at his Youtube and Twitter stats: Img Img
As you can see, Dr. Corsisās current notoriety has everything to do with Q. His book was published on March 2018 and you see there is no significant change on the curves at that date. So Dr. Corsi has successfully conducted his mission: infiltrate Qās base and build a substantial number of followers he can now manipulate according to Alexās instructions.
Now the relevant question would be: is Dr. Corsi loyal to Q? I have the answer. I will give it to you.
Do you remember Alexās rant on Syria? I will not provide links because it was a dark moment for alternative media. Those who read Q knew all along what was going on in Syria, you may explore my posts about it. Events proved Alex was way off in his assessment of the situation and we are therefore entitled to question the relevancy of his āhigh level sourcesā. When asked about Alexās meltdown, this is Corsisās response, letās listen until 4:40 [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/Z7fQwczsks8?t=147)
Now letās analyze:
āAlex has his own way of doing things, he doesnāt really need my approval to do it, and I donātā¦ you knowā¦ā Corsi stops after āand I donātā and looks for his words. Now question: what do you think was the natural ending of this sentence? You got it: he was about to say: āand I donāt need his approval eitherā. But he could not say it because he knows itās not true and, as a vulnerable asset in Alexās mighty hands, he did not want to risk upsetting his boss with a little independence displayed in a YT interview.
The other important sentence is this one: āThe real strength of Alex is heās the most disruptive media to the MSM that exists worldwide and as such he has tremendous impact.ā
The only reason Alex was able to disrupt MSM was because of privileged intel he had right? People came to him to know what the Mockingbird MSM would not disclose right? But then, as early as October 29th 2017, Q said this:
Q12 Military Intelligence ref above is the absolute biggest inside drop this board will ever receive.
Then, a few months later, he says this:
Q761 This board has more power than you can imagine. Q
Q768 This board in the coming months will be spread & discussed across ALL PLATFORMS.
You see the problem? Q has been and still is an existential threat to Infowars. As simple as that. Alex Jones has done everything he could to shut down this phenomenon.
āI donāt criticize Alex. I try to understand where heās going and I try to appreciate it.ā āI still greatly admire what Alex does and would never criticize him or offer advice or opinions unless he specifically asked and then I would be happy to share that privately with him.ā
Okayā¦ It seems Corsi has beautiful manners. Now letās listen to what he thinks about Q. I have already shared with you in my [previous post] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8hqo5n/q1315_trumps_tweet_confirms_the_q_5_photo_puzzle/?st=jgz6twag&sh=0dceaa85) how he ridiculed him even though he had no clue what Q was saying. But there is more here, letās listen until 5:35 [video] (https://web.archive.org/web/20180511191025/https://youtu.be/wR-97KGaiq4?t=307).
āQ is in disinformationāā¦ āI started trashing Qāā¦ āI was ready to quit this board all together and do it myself, and that is seriously under consideration by the wayā.
Whaaaaaaat?!
So there you have it. Corsi would never criticize mighty Alex but Q? Oh no! Q is to be trashed and even replaced! Replaced? You see? We went full circleā¦
Corsi would never advise Alex unless he was asked to and he would do it privately but Q? And Trump? Go listen to a few of his Youtube videos: Corsi tells them what to do with Mueller, Sessions, Iranā¦ He knows exactly what to do on pretty much everythingā¦
Corsi even forgets the hand that fed him and dares to make threats: āand that is seriously under consideration by the wayā.
Yesā¦ now that you have infiltrated our Movement, fed off of some of its crowd (check the stats above), you can get out with the hijacked goods the silence the anons (the real ones) have given you all these months out of respect, patiently putting up with your limitations and constant disrespect towards Trump and Q. You should have finished the mean and revealing sentence you have started (did you catch it?): āAs far as I am concerned, Q has servedā¦ā. Watch the video again. Unbelievable. I hope to shortly see the memes of the side by side statements of Q, Jones and Corsi. This long post has given you the material to produce them. This post is based on facts. Real facts. It was not aiming at anything else except presenting verifiable facts so that people know who is who and what the motivations of each actor are.
The final issue that needs to be addressed is the idea of a cult that has been agitated by Alex and Corsi. Those who follow Q are not in a cult. Q is given the respect he deserves because he is risking his life to give us the intel MSM or Infowars will not give us. Who told us about Saudi Arabia before it happened? Who told us Trump was in Las Vegas? Who told us the real reason behind the steel price issue? Who told us about Flynn it would be done in 30? Yes, Q delivered here too but Corsi failed to decode it correctly. And the list goes onā¦ Q is listened to because we have proof he is right next to Trump, the President we elected to clean up the mess and save our children. People did not vote for Infowars, they voted for Trump. So youāll have to accept it if they drop you without hesitation should you express any kind of opposition.
Now that things are clarified, I think I will never have to write about Infowars, Alex Jones and Corsi again. We are busy. We have things to do.
Q1296 You decide. This is not a game. The only profit we should all be striving for is TRUE FREEDOM. God bless you all. Q
JuanitaBroaddrick (Twatt) Was anything ever done to this teacher? Where was this?
https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1492955147101683718
(Twatt) Canadian police are removing protestors from their cars and arresting them
https://twitter.com/MAGAJew2/status/1492865048993316864
USArmy (Twatt) Behind the Victory!
From Obstacle courses to tank live fires - there's always something to see at
@FortBenning
!
Take a look at some recent training highlights!
#BehindtheVictory
12:04 EST
1204
Mack is naming names.
Big names in H-Wood / Govāt (local/federal).
Proof.
The āStandardā Hotel.
Helicopter crash.
All related.
Future will prove past.
AS.
Feeling ok today?
Why is the MX border / Long Beach Port so important?
Tick TOCK (LLC).
Q
>>1121272
Alison Mack singing like a canary, as Alan Dershowitz would say
>>1121283
Canary palm tree?
Signal?
Q
https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1492893773256437760
KANSAS (Twatt) āāFor I know the plans I have for you,ā declares the Lord, āplans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.āā Jeremiah 29:11
11:09 EST
1109
https:// twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/983423715332558848
CA Targeted.
How often does POTUS RT weekly address?
April Showers.
Q
2911
Test 10
Q
11
Key:
Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA
No approval or congressional oversight
State Secrets upheld under SC
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?
Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.
29
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, heās an actor in the play. Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.
The pedo networks are being dismantled.
The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries) are paused (not terminated until players in custody).
We pray every single day for Godās guidance and direction as we are truly up against pure evil.
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1492962994858385411
JennaEllis (Twatter) For everyone making fun of Mike Lindellā¦ I donāt always agree with his political views, but I respect that he is unashamed of his Christian witness and his testimony. He has helped so many people through Lindell Recovery Network. Donāt lose sight of Christ because of politics.
https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1492964604129034242
KANSAS (Twatt) On this day we honor the memory of Justice Antonin Scalia, a true constitutionalist. His legacy will carry on forever.
15:51 EST
1551
Why wasn't HRC prosecuted for the emails?
(( on 2016 TIMELINE BREAD LINKS about Scalia death Feb 11-~14, 2016 >>104554, >>104555, ))
(( TIMELINE BREAD Posts of the Tarmac Meeting >>104598, >>104599))
Tarmac to dropping of the "Mid Year Exam" email look into scandal Tarmac Meeting: June 27 - July 5th announcing the end of investigation.
June 27, 2016 ā Lynch met with President Bill Clinton at an airport in Phoenix after Clinton realized the two were on separate planes on the same tarmac.
July 1, 2016 ā Lynch said at the Aspen Institute that she āwouldnāt do it againā; she made clear she wouldnāt formally recuse herself from the investigation, but would accept the recommendations of career DOJ staff and the FBI.
July 2, 2016 ā Hillary Clinton was interviewed by FBI for three-and-a-half hours.
Morning of July 5, 2016 ā Comey, in āA Higher Loyalty,ā said he called Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and told them that he planned to hold a news conference on the Clinton case and was not coordinating the statement with the Justice Department. Comey writes in the book Lynch asked only, āWhat will you be recommending?ā and he replied with, āIām sorry, but Iām not going to answer that.ā He added: āItās very important that I not have coordinated this in any way with the department. I hope some day you will understand why.ā Lynch said nothing, according to Comey.
Later on July 5, 2016 ā Comey issued a surprise statement on the email server investigation recommending no charges against Clinton; he said DOJ officials ādo not know what I am about to say.ā
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/key-dates-fbi-hillary-clinton-emails/index.html