Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 3:27 p.m. No.13585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3662 >>3694 >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

>>>/qresearch/11729842

listing here for digs.

 

Sequoia Licensed Cell Phone Reporting Hardware From Smartmatic

2008

 

"Smartmatic promises to grant to Hart a license to use its intellectual property currently found in Sequoia’s machines."

 

https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/court-of-chancery/2008/105040-1.html

 

What IP was Sequoia using?

 

"What Blaine did not say is that the Edge2Plus and Hybrid Activator Accumulator Transmitter (“HAAT”) are owned by Smartmatic and licensed by Smartmatic to Sequoia."

 

https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/itl/vote/SequoiaSmartmaticReport61208.pdf

 

What is HAAT?

 

"Sequoia's Optech Insight has an optional modem for transmitting election results, and can also transmit results via a proprietary Sequoia device called a Hybrid Activator and Accumulator (HAAT).The HAAT accumulates results from machines in a polling place, and transmits them to the jurisidiction's central election office via a wireless cellular network."

 

https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/sequoia/optech-insight/?format=pdf

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 4:54 p.m. No.13627   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13613

as it 'i'm outta here on the double'

 

>>13623

mr foodies, kek

 

>>13626

>Atlantic Council defending Smartmatic

fox meet fox

 

>>13626

trying to sort this stuff out

is like untangling fishing line

but then - that's on purpose

hey look, our old fren Ciaramella - connected to Malloch-Brown

And KA-ma-la has another connection to SGO/Smartmatic

plus Soros, Clintons, and UK royalty

COZY.

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 5:25 p.m. No.13635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3662 >>3694 >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

Saw a ref to this on /qresearch/

 

What is Scytl's InVote?

Simplify the elections process for your office while allowing your voters to participate from anywhere in the world ON ANY DEVICE

 

Like - a CELL PHONE?

 

https://www.scytl.com/wp-

content/uploads/2018/03/Brochure-Invote.pdf

 

Scytl Expands to the Private Market With Online Voting Solution Invote

Oct 30, 2018

Leveraging the technology and expertise trusted by governments from more than 20 countries over the past 15 years to run their most critical elections, Invote brings end-to-end encryption and verifiable online voting to private sector organizations to ensure voter privacy, vote anonymity, election integrity and transparency throughout the entire election process.

 

https://www.scytl.com/en/scytl-expands-private-market-online-voting-invote/

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 8:12 p.m. No.13693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3694 >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

Ron

@CodeMonkeyZ

The Colorado Secretary of State is DELETING DOMINION DOCUMENTS from the official Colorado Secretary of State website:

https://sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/files/2015/projectPlans/Dominion.pdf

 

Luckily we have archives, local copies, and printed hard copies:

https://archive.is/EB8JX

 

@JenaGriswold

What are you trying to hide?

 

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1330362078368960512

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 8:34 p.m. No.13698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

FORMER CHIEF OFFICER FOR PFIZER SAYS "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"

 

In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."

 

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

 

https://discover.hubpages.com/politics/Pfizer-Chief-Science-Officer-Second-Wave-Based-on-Fake-Data-of-False-Positives-for-New-Cases-Pandemic-is-Over?fbclid=IwAR3IypCjPlQn518OToyLO2-VGwne0tvxUxT8hYPNBQoOKSSpkqRSFUaI6JI

 

The full article includes 3 things that make it worth reading:

 

  1. current stats on incidence vs death rates (incidence sky high vs almost zero death rates

 

  1. comparison of Sweden with other countries (guess what that looks like, kek)

 

  1. death rates of covid vs other diseases

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 8:40 p.m. No.13700   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3701 >>3705 >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

>>13696

What is Election Guard?

 

Every election year, millions of Americans are eligible to cast their ballots to elect officials ranging from members of school boards to the President of the United States. Those millions of voters need to be confident that the democratic process is carried out without interference.

 

However, in recent years, technology designed to help elections run smoothly has been targeted by those seeking to influence, subvert or sabotage democracy.

 

That’s why Microsoft has been working with governments, NGOs, academics and industry on the Defending Democracy Program. One of the key components is ElectionGuard.

 

[Read more: Another step in testing ElectionGuard]

 

What does ElectionGuard do?

 

ElectionGuard is a way of checking election results are accurate, and that votes have not been altered, suppressed or tampered with in any way. Individual voters can see that their vote has been accurately recorded, and their choice has been correctly added to the final tally. Anyone who wishes to monitor the election can check all votes have been correctly tallied to produce an accurate and fair result.

 

Why do we need it?

 

There is overwhelming evidence that attempts have been made to target digital election infrastructure. For example, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, actors sponsored by the Russian state infiltrated voter registration databases as part of a wider campaign of election interference. Fortunately, there is no evidence of any successful tampering with actual votes.

 

But, as Josh Benaloh, Senior Principal Cryptographer at Microsoft Research, explains, vote casting and tabulation systems are extremely vulnerable. “The challenge is asymmetric. In the U.S., elections are run locally – mostly by counties, sometimes even by townships – yet the attackers can be nation states. It’s simply not reasonable to expect a small county government can withstand an attack from a nation-state attacker.”

 

How does it work?

 

Because attacks cannot always be prevented, it is vital that they are detected, so that voters know if the result can be trusted. That requires stringent auditing.

 

Election monitors carry out spot checks on individual ballots in what is known as risk-limiting audits. But ElectionGuard allows for a much more comprehensive – and public – audit, by providing end-to-end verifiability.

 

Each vote is encrypted and given a unique identifier. The voter is given a tracking code that lets them check that their vote goes through the system unchanged and ends up in the final tally.

 

page 1, con't.

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.13701   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3704 >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

>>13700

 

Not every voter needs to track their ballot to ensure the system maintains its integrity. In fact, if just 1% of voters nationally check that their ballots are correctly encrypted and tallied, it would be almost impossible for anyone to tamper with more than 100 votes out of 100 million without being caught.

 

At the same time, the way the encrypted votes are tallied can be checked by anyone to make sure that each candidate gets the correct number of votes.

 

Will anyone be able to see who I have voted for?

 

No. The principle of secret ballots means that not only should each person’s vote be private, it must be private, so that votes cannot be bought, sold or coerced.

 

ElectionGuard uses something called homomorphic encryption to ensure that nobody can tell how a person voted. In fact, even the voter cannot use the tracking code to prove to anyone else how they voted – they will only be able to prove that their vote wasn’t changed.

 

It is also possible to add up encrypted data so that only the final tally can be decrypted. This means that people can check the final tallies without seeing any information about the individual votes.

 

Will it change the way elections have to be run?

 

No. ElectionGuard is designed to work with current voting systems, and Microsoft has been working alongside manufacturers and vendors to incorporate it into existing infrastructure (although it won’t be available for the Presidential election in November, and won’t be widely deployed for some time). Paper ballots can be scanned and voting machines used as they are now. The only difference voters will see is the unique tracking code they are given at the end, which they can choose to use or throw in the trash.

 

Spot checks and administrative audits can be carried out by the members of the existing canvassing boards who currently decide on whether ballots are eligible or spoiled, with built-in safeguards to make sure no individual can either disrupt or influence the verification process.

 

How can we trust it?

 

The fundamental principle behind ElectionGuard is that it gives the power to check whether elections are valid to individuals. Every single voter has the ability to verify their own vote – most likely on public websites set up by election boards or local authorities. And anyone can use a verification program to check the final tallies.

 

Nobody has to just take Microsoft’s word for it – or anyone else’s for that matter. ElectionGuard is a set of open source software components that can be accessed here. Anyone with the programming skills can create their own verification tool. In practice, this means every political party, candidate, news organization or pressure group can run their own checks and make their preferred program publicly available for others.

 

The first pilot has already been successfully carried out in an election in Fulton, Wisconsin.

 

Is this just a way of Microsoft making money off elections?

 

ElectionGuard is not a for-profit enterprise, and Microsoft will make no money from it. The technology is being developed and piloted with multiple stakeholders, and is freely available to anyone who wishes to use it, whether in the U.S. or in democracies around the world.

 

For more on how technology can be used to protect the integrity of elections, visit Defending Democracy Program And follow @MSFTIssues on Twitter.

 

https://news.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2020/03/27/what-is-electionguard/

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 8:57 p.m. No.13705   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3712 >>3768 >>3775

>>13696

>>13700

Couldn't find any articles critical of Electionguard - but it's less than a year old. And given MS's reputation for buggy software, that's not great news.

 

But this short vid of Roger Stone doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Something's wrong with him - weird eye movements. He also seems disoriented.

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 9 p.m. No.13706   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13704

I worked for Microsoft a coupla times - long time ago, when they were still producing millionaires and people marvelled at the free juice in the cafeteria.

So no trust after that.

But take a look at the Roger Stone vid - weird.

Can't help but wonder whether he's just jumping on the bandwagon.

Anonymous ID: 296748 Nov. 21, 2020, 9:13 p.m. No.13708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3728

Jenna Ellis

@JennaEllisEsq

MicroPenis syndrome. Sad.

 

https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1330346436760903682

 

              • -

 

this chic's got balls.