https://twitter.com/USArmy/status/1678390879784955907
USArmy (Twatt) #MondayMotivation: I stand ready to deploy, engage and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.
9:09 EST
909
Just in: Planned Parenthood cuts ties with Women's March regional leader over Farrakhan support.
>>612417
>>612799
Review Congressional investigation.
Re_read drops PP.
We are working to END.
EVIL.
Not as it appears.
Q
(#1.)
07/09/2023
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1678495017474617376
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) EVERYWHERE HE GOES…😂😂😂
16:02 EST
1602
This tweet struck me as odd.. almost as if it were a marker of sorts
>>1925226
If you continue to proceed down this dangerous path only know that we are prepared.
You should know this based on earlier drops re: SA / Nat Guard / MIL Assets activate US soil.
The game is over when the public knows.
The fight to keep the LIGHTS OFF is all that matters to you.
You will FAIL.
The AMERICAN PEOPLE are AWAKE.
You lost CONTROL.
SHEEP NO MORE.
You underestimated their resolve and their ability to free-think away from the pipeline narrative.
We will DECLAS.
We will shine LIGHT.
THERE IS NOWHERE TO HIDE.
No amount of money, influence, or power can stop this.
Our rights to secure and protect at all costs then become justified.
We stand at the ready.
RED WAVE.
WHITE SQUALL.
IN GOD WE TRUST.
Q
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/110691385646521746
ILPresidento (TruSoc) EVERYWHERE HE GOES…😂😂😂
15:15 EST
1515
https://gettr.com/post/p2looej6a9a
Il Donaldo Trumpo (Gettr) EVERYWHERE HE GOES…😂😂😂
15:14 EST
1514
THIS Q
WE HAVE IT ALL
]HUBER[ ???
>>1768697
News unlocks.
Q
https://t.me/RealDonaldoTrumpo/16895
IL Donaldo Trumpo (T.me) EVERYWHERE HE GOES…😂😂😂
15:15 EST
1515
These reporters and networks have been named in the WikiLeaks to have colluded with the DNC or Hillary campaign during the 2016 election cycle:
ABC – Cecilia Vega
ABC - David Muir
ABC – Diane Sawyer
ABC – George Stephanoplous
ABC – Jon Karl
ABC – Liz Kreutz
AP – Julie Pace
AP – Ken Thomas
AP – Lisa Lerer
AURN – April Ryan
Bloomberg – Jennifer Epstein
Bloomberg – John Heillman
Bloomberg/MSNBC – Jonathan Alter
Bloomberg – Mark Halperin
Buzzfeed – Ben Smith
Buzzfeed – Ruby Cramer
CBS – Gayle King
CBS – John Dickerson
CBS – Norah O'Donnell
CBS – Steve Chagaris
CBS – Vicki Gordon
CNBC – John Harwood
CNN – Brianna Keilar
CNN – Dan Merica
CNN – David Chailan
CNN – Erin Burnett
CNN – Gloria Borger
CNN – Jake Tapper
CNN – Jeff Zeleny
CNN - Jeff Zucker
CNN – John Berman
CNN – Kate Bouldan
CNN – Maria Cardona
CNN – Mark Preston
CNN – Sam Feist
Daily Beast – Jackie Kucinich
GPG – Mike Feldman
HuffPo – Amanda Terkel
HuffPo – Arianna Huffington
HuffPo – Sam Stein
HuffPo – Whitney Snyder
LAT – Evan Handler
LAT – Mike Memoli
McClatchy – Anita Kumar
MORE – Betsy Fisher Martin
MSNBC – Alex Seitz-Wald
MSNBC – Alex Wagner
MSNBC – Andrea Mitchell
MSNBC - Beth Fouhy
MSNBC – Ed Schultz
MSNBC – Joe Scarborough
MSNBC – Mika Brzezinski
MSNBC – Phil Griffin
MSNBC – Rachel Maddow
MSNBC – Rachel Racusen
MSNBC – Thomas Roberts
National Journal – Emily Schultheis
NBC – Chuck Todd
NBC – Mark Murray
NBC – Savannah Gutherie
New Yorker – David Remnick
New Yorker – Ryan Liza
NPR – Mike Oreskes
NPR – Tamara Keith
NY Post – Geofe Earl
NYT – Amy Chozik
NYT – Carolyn Ryan
NYT – Gail Collins
NYT – John Harwoodje
NYT – Jonathan Martin
NYT – Maggie Haberman
NYT – Pat Healey
PBS – Charlie Rose
People – Sandra Sobieraj Westfall
Politico – Annie Karni
Politico – Gabe Debenedetti
Politico – Glenn Thrush
Politico – Kenneth Vogel
Politico – Mike Allen
Reuters – Amanda Becker
Tina Brown – Tina Brown
The Hill – Amie Parnes
Univision – Maria-Elena Salinas
Vice – Alyssa Mastramonoco
Vox – Jon Allen
WaPo – Anne Gearan
WaPo – Greg Sargent
WSJ – Laura Meckler
WSJ – Peter Nicholas
WSJ – Colleen McCain Nelson
Yahoo – Matt Bai
THE BRIDGE: PODESTA GROUP
Bridge between media, FBI/DOJ, HRC+
Why did the Podesta Group close?
Public charges?
No?
Why close?
When did Huber start?
November?
JP/ Huma NOV.
Sealed.
Do they know?
Why did the Podesta group close?
Why no leaks?
Who else knows?
HRC deal request?
Why?
IG>Huber
Can IG disclose evidence in pending criminal cases in public disclosures/reports?
Why not?
Grand jury TAINT/BIAS?
Everyone has an opinion.
Clickbait.
Q
(#2.)
07/102023
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1678498348666322949
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) I KNOW A FAN WHEN I SEE ONE!!!😍😍😍
16:16 EST
1616
https://yournewswire.com/clinton-campaign-official-arrested-child-rape/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Coincidence?
These people are sick!
Q
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/110691629648121446
ILPresidento (TruSoc) I KNOW A FAN WHEN I SEE ONE!!!😍😍😍
16:17 EST
1617
https://gettr.com/post/p2lohvfbab9
Il Donaldo Trumpo (Gettr) I KNOW A FAN WHEN I SEE ONE!!!😍😍😍
16:17 EST
1617
https://t.me/RealDonaldoTrumpo/16895
IL Donaldo Trumpo (T.me) I KNOW A FAN WHEN I SEE ONE!!!😍😍😍
16:17 EST
1617
Only the beginning.
Power to the people.
http://time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/
Q
https://twitter.com/BenNollWeather/status/1678175059771367426
(Twatt) Current scene in West Point, New York / #HudsonValley 🌊
The radar estimates that over 10 inches of rain fell today, nearly the amount that typically falls over an entire summer!
⚠️ There’s more rain to come…
📸 Megan Cardone via a resident of West Point, NY
https://twitter.com/VTStatePolice/status/1678415420968058881
(Twatt) Serious, life-threatening flooding is occurring today across much of Vermont. Emergency crews have conducted rescues in multiple communities. About two dozen state roads are closed as of 10AM. Flash flood warnings are in effect from the Massachusetts line to the Canadian border.
https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1678162919689781255
(Twatt) "THREAD/Comments": The mainstream media are coordinating with each other to attempt to discredit Sound of Freedom because it exposes real life child trafficking.
These outlets want to hide the truth:
Washington Post
Rolling Stone
Media Matters
Jezebel
The Guardian
(#3.)
07/102023
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1678511143688495104
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) HE SEEMS TO BE DOING WELL…😂😂😂
17:06 EST
1706
No name returning to headlines.
Q
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/110691894529495707
ILPresidento (TruSoc) HE SEEMS TO BE DOING WELL…😂😂😂
17:24 EST
1724
https://gettr.com/post/p2lomqabec1
Il Donaldo Trumpo (Gettr) HE SEEMS TO BE DOING WELL…😂😂😂
17:24 EST
1724
https://t.me/RealDonaldoTrumpo/16897
IL Donaldo Trumpo (T.me) HE SEEMS TO BE DOING WELL…😂😂😂
17:24 EST
1724
>>2310523
Public awareness forces hand.
Q
>>2310672
PS round 2.
[Lead investigator HRC/Russia].
Q
94C1F069-082D-4492-9BA8-08B323A3669D.jpeg
>>2310720
Warning to UK?
Decipher re: last.
[Redacted FISA].
Q
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna27545248
McCain concedes, urges unity with Obama(NBC"news".com)
Sen. John McCain ended his quest for the presidency Tuesday night in his home state of Arizona, where he conceded the race to his Democratic rival, Barack Obama.
Nov. 4, 2008, 11:06 PM EST
Republican John McCain conceded the presidential race to Barack Obama, saying the Democrat has achieved a "great thing for himself and for his country."
Flanked by wife Cindy and running-mate Sarah Palin, McCain spoke to supporters outside the Arizona Biltmore Hotel shortly after 9 p.m. Tuesday, saying the "American people have spoken and they have spoken clearly."
He conceded the contest as polls closed on the West Coast, adding a string of states to Obama's electoral vote tally and sealing the Illinois senator's victory.
McCain stressed the historic nature of the election, noting that an invitation to Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House by Theodore Roosevelt had been viewed as an insult in some quarters.
"Senator Obama has achieved a great thing for himself and for his country," McCain said.
'Failure is mine'
Although McCain had criticized Obama during the hard-fought campaign as too inexperienced to be president, the Arizona senator said that "in a contest as long and as difficult as this campaign has been, his success alone commands my respect for his ability and perseverance.
"But that he managed to do so by inspiring the hopes of so many millions of Americans who had once wrongly believed that they had little at stake or little influence in the election of an American president is something I deeply admire and commend him for achieving."
McCain told his supporters that it was natural "to feel some disappointment. Though we fell short, the failure is mine, not yours."
McCain had been all but counted out of the contest for the GOP nomination in the summer of 2007, when his campaign was all but broke, and his comeback was a remarkable political feat.
"I don't know what more we could have done to win this election," McCain said. "I'll leave that to others to determine. … I won't spend a moment in the future regretting what might have been."
McCain also praised Palin, his surprise choice for vice president. The Alaska governor excited the GOP base, especially evangelical voters, but critics dismissed her political resume as brief and light on substance.
Palin is "one of the best campaigners I have ever seen, and an impressive new voice in our party for reform and the principles that have always been our greatest strength," McCain said, adding that she and her family showed "courage and grace" in the "rough and tumble of a presidential campaign."
Anger among some supporters
Jeri Mott, 58, of Tucson, listened to McCain's concession speech with her arms tightly crossed and a look of disgust on her face.
"I'm thinking that I'm real worried about what's going to happen tomorrow, especially about my troops," said Mott, whose son recently enlisted in the Army. "He'd better be paying close attention to what he's doing with our troops," she said of Democrat Barack Obama. "Don't leave them with nothing."
As for the historic nature of the night, Mott didn't much care.
"I have no problem with an African American at the helm. It's his vision of what he wants to do that I have a big problem with."
"The wrong African American," she called Obama.
'I'm really sad'
Molly Pinckney, 60, of Phoenix stood frowning, the red pom pom she earlier had waved tucked by her side.
"I'm really sad. I'm sad for our country."
What happens next depends on the president-elect, she said. "It really depends on how Obama behaves … whether he's going to let rabble-rousers tear this country apart."
The night began appropriately enough with Elton John's "I'm Still Standing" booming from the speakers at the Arizona Biltmore resort, the same place where, 28 years ago, McCain and his wife, Cindy, celebrated their wedding.
Hundreds of supporters wore buttons and T-shirts proclaiming "Victory 2008," chanted their guy's name and, like the candidate they gathered to honor, projected optimism and faith.
But as the night wore on, organizers temporarily stopped broadcasting the returns overhead and announced few results, as if not to put a damper on the party. Those they did disclose lagged behind national projections showing Obama gaining on McCain.
Even after Obama had been declared the winner in Pennsylvania and Ohio, former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer walked on stage to tell the crowd about "another state in the McCain category. It's the great state of Louisiana!"
A roar erupted, and Roemer promised: "This election still has some anxious moments to go."
Building momentum?
Returns unavailable to them, supporters instead danced to Hank Williams Jr. singing, "Mac is going to survive."
"He's already lost Ohio. They think. Right?" said John Moore said from the back of the crowded ballroom. "I'm wondering why they're not showing us that much. I wish I had a BlackBerry so I could track it myself."
He and his wife tried to put a positive spin on the information blackout: "I'm sure it's going to be positive," said John. "Maybe they're building momentum."
But around 8:30 local time, U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., took to the stage to deliver what sounded like a eulogy to McCain's quest for the presidency.
"The truth of the matter is it is uphill. This has always been an uphill race. Yet John McCain kept clawing back, he kept clawing back until tonight." He applauded McCain's "fighting spirit," while still telling the crowd the race was too close to call.
One supporter muttered, "I'm feeling like doom is coming."
In closing, Kyl cited a Bible passage that seemed as appropriate an ending to McCain's campaign as any.
2 Timothy 4:7: "I have fought a good fight. I have finished my course. I have kept the faith."
Before McCain took the stage, Nathaniel Eyler, 29, of Phoenix, mouthed the words as the song "God Bless the USA" played.
"Scared," he said in response to how he felt about the outcome, calling Obama a "socialist."
"I'm not going to sugarcoat it. I'm scared. Just the idea of Barack Obama as president of the United States scares me. It does not embody the idealism I grew up with and am passionate about. We're Americans. We're resilient. We'll bounce back. Our government's idiot-proof. There's nothing he can do that we can't fix in the end."
Still, he said, "We're going to be taking steps backwards."
(#4.)
07/102023
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1678517591436939268
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) BOOOOOOOM!!!😎 #RedPilled
17:32 EST
1732
>>2311893
>Who has authority to launch a missle?
Q said unauthorized, so…
>>2311980
Given CoC process to launch what does this tell you?
CLAS removal WASH minutes after.
Q
>>2312021
Specific reason for the reminder.
Everything stated has a purpose.
Q
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/110691929304162875
ILPresidento (TruSoc) BOOOOOOOM!!!😎 #RedPilled
17:33 EST
1733
https://gettr.com/post/p2lpd7tb8f4
Il Donaldo Trumpo (Gettr) BOOOOOOOM!!!😎 #RedPilled
17:33 EST
1733
https://t.me/RealDonaldoTrumpo/16898
IL Donaldo Trumpo (T.me) BOOOOOOOM!!!😎 #RedPilled
17:33 EST
1733
Who recently pulled out of FB?
Artificial support.
What events recently occurred in China re: FB?https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/business/facebook-china.html
Why did China suddenly reverse course?
The more you know.
Q
https://twitter.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1678450354747318272
MarcoPolo (Twatt) CCN #16113799: “CIC reports the sound of gunshots at 2134 Flagler Pl. NW. Upon arriving at the scene, the decedent was laying in the Southwest corner of the intersection of W St. and Flager Pl. NW. The decedent was conscious and breathing with apparent gunshot wound(s) to the back. The decedent was alert and attempted to describe a suspect. The decedent stated he heard the suspect(s) speaking Spanish. The decedent started to slur speech and was unintelligible. The decedent handed officer O'Leary a cell phone speaking unintelligible [sic]. The decedent stated he was hit then unintelligible speech pointing to the cell phone. The decedent was transported to local area hospital and was pronounced by attending physician at 0557 hours."
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1496023589075.jpg
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02/exclusive-cyber-security-experts-release-damning-report-why-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians/
EXCLUSIVE… Cyber-Security Experts Release Damning Report: Why The DNC Was Not Hacked By the Russians(GateWayPundit.com)
EXCLUSIVE… Cyber-Security Experts Release Damning Report: Why The DNC Was Not Hacked By the Russians
by Jim Hoft Feb. 14, 2019 7:00 am269 Comments
Investigation by cyber-security and intelligence experts William Binney and Larry Johnson
WHY THE DNC WAS NOT HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS
The FBI, CIA and NSA claim that the DNC emails published by WIKILEAKS on July 26, 2016 were obtained via a Russian hack, but more than three years after the alleged “hack” no forensic evidence has been produced to support that claim. In fact, the available forensic evidence contradicts the official account that blames the leak of the DNC emails on a Russian internet “intrusion”. The existing evidence supports an alternative explanation–the files taken from the DNC on between 23 and 25 May 2016 and were copied onto a file storage device, such as a thumb drive.
If the Russians actually had conducted an internet based hack of the DNC computer network then the evidence of such an attack would have been collected and stored by the National Security Agency. The technical systems to accomplish this task have been in place since 2002. The NSA had an opportunity to make it clear that there was irrefutable proof of Russian meddling, particularly with regard to the DNC hack, when it signed on to the January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment,” regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election:
We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
Do This Immediately If You Have Moles Or Skin Tags (It's Genius!)
Ears Ringing? Do This Immediately, It's Genius (Watch)
Urologist: Enlarged Prostate? Do This Immediately (Genius!)
The phrase, “moderate confidence” is intelligence speak for “we have no hard evidence.” Thanks to the leaks by Edward Snowden, we know with certainty that the NSA had the capability to examine and analyze the DNC emails. NSA routinely “vacuumed up” email traffic transiting the U.S. using robust collection systems (whether or not anyone in the NSA chose to look for this data is another question). If those emails had been hijacked over the internet then NSA also would have been able to track the electronic path they traveled over the internet. This kind of data would allow the NSA to declare without reservation or caveat that the Russians were guilty. The NSA could admit to such a fact in an unclassified assessment without compromising sources and methods. Instead, the NSA only claimed to have moderate confidence in the judgement regarding Russian meddling. If the NSA had hard intelligence to support the judgement the conclusion would have been stated as “full confidence.”
Conservatives Are Looking For Ways To Boycott and Move Spending Away From Woke Corporations – Here Is One Way To Do It
POLL: Should Trump Declassify The FISA Documents To Expose The Deep State?
We believe that Special Counsel Robert Mueller faces major embarrassment if he decides to pursue the indictment he filed–which accuses 12 Russian GRU military personnel and an entity identified as, Guccifer 2.0, for the DNC hack—because the available forensic evidence indicates the emails were copied onto a storage device.
According to a DOJ press release on the indictment of the Russians, Mueller declares that the emails were obtained via a “spearphising” attack:
In 2016, officials in Unit 26165 began spearphishing volunteers and employees of the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, including the campaign’s chairman. Through that process, officials in this unit were able to steal the usernames and passwords for numerous individuals and use those credentials to steal email content and hack into other computers. They also were able to hack into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) through these spearphishing techniques to steal emails and documents, covertly monitor the computer activity of dozens of employees, and implant hundreds of files of malicious computer code to steal passwords and maintain access to these networks.
The officials in Unit 26165 coordinated with officials in Unit 74455 to plan the release of the stolen documents for the purpose of interfering with the 2016 presidential election. Defendants registered the domain DCLeaks.com and later staged the release of thousands of stolen emails and documents through that website. On the website, defendants claimed to be “American hacktivists” and used Facebook accounts with fictitious names and Twitter accounts to promote the website. After public accusations that the Russian government was behind the hacking of DNC and DCCC computers, defendants created the fictitious persona Guccifer 2.0. On the evening of June 15, 2016 between 4:19PM and 4:56PM, defendants used their Moscow-based server to search for a series of English words and phrases that later appeared in Guccifer 2.0’s first blog post falsely claiming to be a lone Romanian hacker responsible for the hacks in the hopes of undermining the allegations of Russian involvement.
Notwithstanding the DOJ press release, an examination of the Wikileaks DNC files do not support the claim that the emails were obtained via spearphising. Instead, the evidence clearly shows that the emails posted on the Wikileaks site were copied onto an electronic media, such as a CD-ROM or thumbdrive before they were posted at Wikileaks. The emails posted on Wikileaks were saved using the File Allocation Table (aka FAT) computer file system architecture.
An examination of the Wikileaks DNC files shows they were created on 23, 25 and 26 May respectively. The fact that they appear in a FAT system format indicates the data was transfered to a storage device, such as a thumb drive.
How do we know? The truth lies in the “last modified” time stamps on the Wikileaks files. Every single one of these time stamps end in even numbers. If you are not familiar with the FAT file system, you need to understand that when a date is stored under this system the data rounds the time to the nearest even numbered second.
We have examined 500 DNC email files stored on Wikileaks and all 500 files end in an even number—2, 4, 6, 8 or 0. If a system other than FAT had been used, there would have been an equal probability of the time stamp ending with an odd number. But that is not the case with the data stored on the Wikileaks site. All end with an even number.
The DNC emails are in 3 batches (times are GMT).
Date Count Min Time Max Time FAT Min Id Max Id
2016-05-23 10520 02:12:38 02:45:42 x 3800 14319
2016-05-25 11936 05:21:30 06:04:36 x 1 22456
Trending: Dad Dies in Front of Children as Wife Films Attempt at Viral Trend: ‘She Recorded His Death’
2016-08-26 13357 14:11:36 20:06:04 x 22457 44053
The random probability that FAT was not used is 1 chance in 2 to the 500th power or approximately 1 chance in 10 to the 150th power – in other words, an infinitely high order.
This data alone does not prove that the emails were copied at the DNC headquarters. But it does show that the data/emails posted by Wikileaks did go through a storage device, like a thumbdrive, before Wikileaks posted the emails on the World Wide Web.
This fact alone is enough to raise reasonable doubts about Mueller’s indictment accusing 12 Russian soldiers as the culprits for the leak of the DNC emails to Wikileaks. A savvy defense attorney will argue, and rightly so, that someone copied the DNC files to a storage device (Eg., USB thumb drive) and transferred that to Wikileaks.
We also tested the hypothesis that Wikileaks could have manipulated the files to produce the FAT result by comparing the DNC email files with the Podesta emails (aka Larter file) that was released on 21 September 2016. The FAT file format is NOT present in the Podesta files. If Wikileaks employed a standard protocol for handling data/emails received from unknown sources we should expect the File structure of the DNC emails to match the file structure of the Podesta emails. The evidence shows otherwise.
There is further compelling technical evidence that undermines the claim that the DNC emails were downloaded over the internet as a result of a spearphising attack. Bill Binney, a former Technical Director of the National Security Agency, along with other former intelligence community experts, examined emails posted by Guccifer 2.0 and discovered that those emails could not have been downloaded over the internet as a result of a spearphising attack. It is a simple matter of mathematics and physics.
Shortly after Wikileaks announced it had the DNC emails, Guccifer 2.0 emerged on the public stage, claimimg that “he” hacked the DNC and that he had the DNC emails. Guccifer 2.0 began in late June 2016 to publish documents as proof that “he” had hacked from the DNC.
Taking Guccifer 2.0 at face value—i.e., that his documents were obtained via an internet attack—Bill Binney conducted a forensic examination of the metadata contained in the posted documents based on internet connection speeds in the United States. This analysis showed that the highest transfer rate was 49.1 megabytes per second, which is much faster than possible from a remote online connection. The 49.1 megabytes speed coincides with the download rate for a thumb drive.
Binney, assisted by other colleagues with technical expertise, extended the examination and ran various tests forensic from the Netherlands, Albania, Belgrade and the UK. The fastest rate obtained — from a data center in New Jersey to a data center in the UK–was 12 megabytes per second, which is less than a fourth of the rate necessary to transfer the data, as it was listed from Guccifer 2.
The findings from the examination of the Guccifer 2.0 data and the Wikileaks data does not prove who copied the information to a thumbdrive, but it does provide and empirical alternative explanation that undermines the Special Counsel’s claim that the DNC was hacked. According to the forensic evidence for the Guccifer 2.0 data, the DNC emails were not taken by an internet spearphising attack. The data breach was local. It was copied from the network.
There is other circumstantial evidence that buttresses the conclusion that the data breach was a local effort that copied data.
First there is the Top Secret information leaked by Edward Snowden. If the DNC emails had been hacked via spearphising (as alleged by Mueller) then the data would have been captured by the NSA by means of the Upstream program (Fairview, Stormbrew, Blarney, Oakstar) and the forensic evidence would not modify times – the data would be presented as sent.
Second, we have the public reporting on the DNC and Crowdstrike, which provide a bizarre timeline for the alleged Russian hacking.
It was 29 April 2016, when the DNC claims it became aware its servers had been penetrated (see https://medium.com/homefront-rising/dumbstruck-how-crowdstrike-conned-america-on-the-hack-of-the-dnc-ecfa522ff44f). No claim yet about who was responsible.
According to CrowdStrike founder, Dimitri Alperovitch, his company first detected the Russians mucking around inside the DNC server on 6 May 2016. A CrowdStrike intelligence analyst reportedly told Alperovitch that:
Falcon had identified not one but two Russian intruders: Cozy Bear, a group CrowdStrike’s experts believed was affiliated with the FSB, Russia’s answer to the CIA; and Fancy Bear, which they had linked to the GRU, Russian military intelligence.
And what did CrowdStrike do about this? Nothing. According to Michael Isikoff, CrowdStrike claimed their inactivity was a deliberate plan to avoid alerting the Russians that they had been “discovered.” This is nonsense. If a security company detected a thief breaking into a house and stealing its contents, what sane company would counsel the client to do nothing in order to avoid alerting the thief? Utter nonsense.
We know from examining the Wikileaks data that the last message copied from the DNC network is dated Wed, 25 May 2016 08:48:35. No DNC emails were taken and released to Wikileaks after that date.
CrowdStrike waited until 10 June 2016 to take concrete steps to clean up the DNC network. Alperovitch told Esquire’s Vicky Ward that:
Ultimately, the teams decided it was necessary to replace the software on every computer at the DNC. Until the network was clean, secrecy was vital. On the afternoon of Friday, June 10, all DNC employees were instructed to leave their laptops in the office.
Why does a cyber security company wait 45 days after allegedly uncovering a massive Russian attack on the DNC server to take concrete steps to safeguard the integrity of the information held on the server? This makes no sense.
A more plausible explanation is that it was discovered that emails had been downloaded from the server and copied onto a device like a thumdrive. But the culprit had not yet been identified. We know one thing for certain—CrowdStrike did not take steps to shutdown and repair the DNC network until 18 days after the last email was copied from the server.
The final curiosity is that the DNC never provided the FBI access to its servers in order for qualified FBI technicians to conduct a thorough forensic examination. If this had been a genuine internet hack, it would be very easy for the NSA to identify when the information was taken and the route it moved after being hacked from the server. The NSA had the technical collection systems in place to enable analysts to know the date and time of the messages. But that has not been done.
Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.
166
(Repost to correct thread).
Expand your thinking.
What are patterns?
How are patterns formed and isolated?
What are data sets?
What is a map?
Re: Twitter (repeat)(important).
What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?
What is the purpose of this action?
Possible test to understand public / gov’t response?
When was this announced?
When did events in SA transpire?
Who controlled a large portion of Twitter stock?
Why is this relevant?
Expand your thinking.
What is the real purpose of this action?
What is the SS?
Who is the primary person protected under the SS?
What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?
Would POTUS be able to use Twitter post action?
Define the ‘known’ action.
Why is the MSM ignoring this action?
What transpired w/ POTUS’ Twitter account a short time ago?
Re-read crumbs on this topic (necessary).
Two scenarios (lose/lose).
POTUS advised by SS to terminate use of Twitter due to new website tracking policy (cookies) amongst other spyware not disclosed (risk) – 1st time they failed (re-read).
POTUS silenced on Twitter due to new policy (re: SS / risk).
Direct message failure.
POTUS refuses to be silenced.
Bad actors gather metadata and targeting.
Small example of the ongoing silent war.
Options?
Regulate?
Problem: time to complete.
Solution?
Patriots, get the word out.
Jason Bourne (Deep Dream).
Q
(#5.)
07/102023
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1678523084008038401
PapiTrumpo (Twatt) BOOOOOOOM!!!🥳🥳🥳
17:54 EST
1754
Offices of MA.
Work on Sunday?
Who is supplying feed?
Who is financing?
Q
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/110692024951513787
ILPresidento (TruSoc) BOOOOOOOM!!!🥳🥳🥳
17:57 EST
1757
https://gettr.com/post/p2lp9uae3f5
Il Donaldo Trumpo (Gettr) BOOOOOOOM!!!🥳🥳🥳
17:57 EST
1757
IL Donaldo Trumpo (T.me) BOOOOOOOM!!!🥳🥳🥳
17:57 EST
1757
Do you believe in coincidences?
https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1006008288318668800
Q
25
Follow up to last post.
Return to comments re: Pelosi and John M (some of us refuse to say his last name for a reason).
This all has meaning - everything stated. Big picture stuff - few positions allow for this direct knowledge.
Proof to begin 11.3.
We all sincerely appreciate the work you do. Keep up the good fight. The flow of information is vital.
God bless.
26
Think about it logically.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).
Biggest advanced drop on Pol.