>>17348 pb
>A good portion of last thread's notables are about "MNR".
can you sauce that, anon?
went looking but could not find that bun
>>17379 pb
Shills and faggots are argumentative, take things too literally, cry "enemy" to those who disgree, and have no sense of humor. Also claim to divine Q's intentions in ways that others cannot.
(Poor companions a for beer at the corner pub!)
Anons are beginning to see thru that and push back more strongly - encouraging. But hard for an anon group to put up effective resistance - one of the reasons i was always suspicious of those who pushed for "anonymity at all costs": because it guarantees a random group wo/leadership (innate 'one-down' position). All the folks with the actual power (either legit or rogue) have identities - Jim, Ron, FJ, OSS, Barkeep (etc).