Anonymous ID: f65cd8 Dec. 8, 2020, 1:13 p.m. No.20178   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0186 >>0192 >>0214 >>0267

Trump is just golfing…right

 

What Trump has achieved since Nov 3rd

 

Trump placed the entire nuclear stock pile under his command

 

Trump ousted the Secretary of Defense and replaced him with a Loyalist

 

Trump had new Secretary of Defense take control of all Special Forces

 

Trump flooded the skies with Military planes that has never been witnessed before and is still ongoing

 

Trump withdrew from Open Skies Treaty to prevent foreign nations flying over America

 

Trump began a massive purge of the Pentagon and replaced the majority with Loyalists

 

Trump ordered the immediate amending of Federal Execution Laws to include to death by hanging, electric chair, gas chamber and firing squad

 

Trump placed America in a State of War on May 20, 2020 and it is not over until May 20, 2021.

 

https://twitter.com/VincentCrypt46/status/1336186439466426368?s=20

Anonymous ID: f65cd8 Dec. 8, 2020, 1:36 p.m. No.20187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0191 >>0214 >>0227 >>0267

>>20173

 

Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules

 

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.

This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.

Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/487348461/TX-v-State-Mpi-2020-12-07-Final#from_embed

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/07/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court-election-rules/

Anonymous ID: f65cd8 Dec. 8, 2020, 1:46 p.m. No.20192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20178

*correction loyalist lowercase - as in a person who remains loyal to the established ruler or government, especially in the face of a revolt.

Anonymous ID: f65cd8 Dec. 8, 2020, 2:58 p.m. No.20227   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0252 >>0267

>>20187, >>20191, >>20173

 

The significance of Texas' lawsuit against battleground states over potential voter fraud.

 

This case is argued in Original Jurisdiction which means it doesn't begin at the district level it begins at the Supreme Court; states can sue states for violation of law or claims in Supreme Court. It is discretionary whether they accept the case and four justices decide.

 

Constitution, 14th Amendment, Article 3 Equal Protection Clause

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

'''Article 2 Section 1

Each state is entitled to select electors pursuant to statutory rules - all of these battleground states have elections at variants with their own statutory rules and secondly, in Pennsylvania the Secretary of State made an affirmative representation to U.S. Supreme Court that ballots would be segregated that were challenged and she failed to comply.'''

 

Key: Outcome Determinative if the Supreme Court were to agree with Texas the four states state legislatures pick electors to determine the outcome.

 

https://aclj.org/election-law/breaking-texas-sues-pa-ga-mi-wi-at-supreme-court

Anonymous ID: f65cd8 Dec. 8, 2020, 3:14 p.m. No.20231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0240

>>20202

Q Post #4953, We're Not Gonna Take It, Anymore

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1l-nR1Apj4

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11709084.html#11953143

https://qagg.news/