Military vehicles transported by train through Oregon on 12/6/20
https://twitter.com/SocrMom23js/status/1336466299275251712?s=20
Kary Mullis: PCR is a process to make a whole lot of something out of something.
Question: How did they misuse PCR to estimate all those free viral RNA's that may or may not be there?
Mullis: "I don't think misuse of PCR is quite…I don't think you can misuse PCR, actually. It's the results, the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all…you can find almost anything in anybody…it starts making you believe in the Buddist notion that everything is contained within everything else. If you can amplify one single molecule, up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, there is very few molecules that you don't have one single one of in your body."
"PCR is a process to make a whole lot of something out of something. That is what it is. It doesn't tell you you are sick or that the thing that got you is going to hurt you."
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7wt40u
https://mynewsla.com/education/2019/08/08/nobel-winner-kary-banks-mullis-who-revolutionized-dna-research-dies-in-o-c/
Notable
Researched this - found no evidence it existed before the date claimed. Did find a pattern of shills on other videos claiming they "saw video before" to debunk it.
if anon thinks it existed before post sauce
2nd x posted and not noted.
Kary Mullis: PCR is a process to make a whole lot of something out of something.
Another relevant quote in video:
"[PCR] allows you to take a minuscule amount of anything and talk about it in meetings like its important. That is not a misuse [of test] that is a misinterpretation."
Interview quotes
https://www.karymullis.com/pcr.shtml
Brandy Vaughn of 'Learn The Risk' Found Dead
Yesterday it was reported on social media that Brandy Vaughn, founder of Learn The Risk, a vaccine awareness non-profit organization, was found unresponsive by her 9-year-old son. Her community was shocked. She was a 47-year-old single mom, apparently healthy, and had been very clear that she no reason to commit suicide.
As a former executive of Merck who spoke out against vaccines, she was harassed and threatened. She knew she was at risk. A year ago, she made a video recording of how her home had been repeatedly broken into, items moved, and she suspected that her home had been bugged. Incidents occurred to demonstrate that someone had been listening to her conversations or watching her by camera.
All of this is extremely sad and frightening for our community. Those who benefited from her friendship, fundraisers for their vaccine-damaged child, insightful information, saw her numerous billboards about vaccine risks, or community organizing are particularly stricken with grief. They will mourn the loss of her life for years to come.
But those who did not know her also grieve because Brandy was a mom who stood up for the safety of other children. She was one of us. One of the best of us. The loss of her life is a loss for all of us. Her courage and generosity were the strongest bonds of camaraderie there are for women. We raise our children in a community, and when our closest community does not believe us, shuns us, and even mocks us, we turn to social media to find support and create a new community.
Brandy was a leader for many years in that online community, particularly in California during the opposition to SB 277 that removed a parent’s religious and personal beliefs regarding the vaccination of their children. She spoke publicly, mentioning Merck’s name and her background as a VIOXX sales rep, letting her audience know that she knew the tactics that were used and how vaccines were being pushed and sold, without safety testing, just like VIOXX was. She knew that the drive to make a profit, for Merck and Big Pharma, far surpassed their commitment to testing and safety. And she was vocal about it.
We don’t know how Brandy died. We may never know. It may have been a natural cause. It may have been murder by the people who most wanted her silenced…during a time of crucial vaccine scrutiny, before the COVID vaccine rollout. We don’t know.
What we do know is that Brandy would not want anyone to stop speaking out about the risks of vaccines. We know that her love for the safety and freedom of every child overwhelmed her fear for her own safety. We know that our own commitment to creating health and freedom is unwavering. Our commitment does not change, but in fact, grows stronger.
No matter what happens, war, death, sickness, famine…historically women have thought about the future, planned for the safety of their tribes, and implemented the actions that needed to be taken. We communicated directly to those in power, stocked up on food, ensured the safety of shelter and food, cared for the sick and wounded, and if needed, migrated to places of safety. But we did not do this alone. We did it as a tribe, a community of women and tribal members who saw the needs, acknowledged them, and took on being the ones to remedy the situation. We have been, and continue to be, the ones in power in our own families.
And that is what we will continue to do. We see the need. We do not ignore the risks of vaccines and government/corporate medical control. We see the risk to our safety, our society, and our long-term potential as a free nation. We see the devastation of our children and their potential eroded away by vaccine damage. We see our elderly struck down by the side effects of vaccines. We SEE these harms, and we do not look away.
As we do not look away from Brandy’s death. We see the tragedy, we feel the loss. We also, as a tribe, will take on the actions to restock and rejuvenate… and carry on.
https://www.momsacrossamerica.com/brandy_vaughn
A GoFundMe has been set up in her honor for potential legal fees.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/brandy-vaughan-learntherisk/donate
https://twitter.com/sallyKP/status/1336489020650557445?s=20
cbsnews.com - May 6, 2009
Merck Created Hit List to "Destroy," "Neutralize" or "Discredit" Dissenting Doctors
Jim Edwards
Merck made a "hit list" of doctors who criticized Vioxx, according to testimony in a Vioxx class action case in Australia. The list, emailed between Merck employees, contained doctors' names with the labels "neutralise," "neutralised" or "discredit" next to them.
According to The Australian, Merck emails from 1999 showed company execs complaining about doctors who disliked using Vioxx. One email said:
We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live …
The plaintiffs' lawyer gave this assessment:
It gives you the dark side of the use of key opinion leaders and thought leaders … if (they) say things you don't like to hear, you have to neutralise them … It does suggest a certain culture within the organisation about how to deal with your opponents and those who disagree with you.
The Australian:
The court was told that James Fries, professor of medicine at Stanford University, wrote to the then Merck head Ray Gilmartin in October 2000 to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers who had criticised the drug.
"Even worse were allegations of Merck damage control by intimidation," he wrote, … "This has happened to at least eight (clinical) investigators … I suppose I was mildly threatened myself but I never have spoken or written on these issues."
The allegations come on the heels of revelations that Merck created a fake medical journal the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine in which to publish studies about Vioxx; had pop songs commissioned about Vioxx to inspire its staff, and paid ghostwriters to draft articles about the drug.
Previously:
New Merck Allegations: A Fake Journal; Ghostwritten Studies; Vioxx Pop Songs; PR Execs Harass Reporters
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-created-hit-list-to-destroy-neutralize-or-discredit-dissenting-doctors/#app