wasn't around when mtg was arranged
so don't know if there is some kind of agenda
anything specific to talk about?
frebe
here - easier that way
i'm also swampfox as bv, in case anyone hasn't figured dat out yet
sorry, similar style - dat's a compliment
feel like i should be giving baking info
old habits die hard
;-}
i'm not runnin' dis non-mtg
but just wanna thank everyone who happens to be here
for making /mnr/ a solid board
proud to serve with you all
shadilay & happy new year, fellow anons
agree with everything
except wanna se crap removed from /mnr/ if it's spam
no need to put up with that
>comin here and spamming the breads though, calling names, where do we draw the line
I have a line
destructive spam is that line
don't care if they say it's censorship
let em
they'll say it anyway
most BOs remove spam - FJ & company too lazy
totally legit
/mnr/ needs no defense imo
board speaks for itself
organized, cooperative, constructive
good notables
just stay steady and hold the line
when shills are allowed to post crap
in a clean environment - can't totally be ignored
think of Rudy G policy with NYC:
when farebeaters jumped over fare boxes in subway, off to jail for a night
because small offenses grow when unchecked
spam is not free speech, no matter what is claimed
oss is a liar through and through
will make things up anyways
does it every day
let him - will hang on own petard eventually
let's figure out what the line is?
personal attacks & red text/muh graphics spam - it's a clear line
= harrassment, stalking, attempted bullying
This is not free speech
BO deleted it the first night and it didn't come back for a long time
Good policy imo
Rusty never tolerated it either - and no apologies given for that
>yurts
getting ready to move to Mongolia?
some of us are on /qr/ and try to make a difference, but in terms of baking there - cannot do wo/anon support. At least, this is my position.
If board as a whole wanted us bakers to bake, pretty sure every baker on /mnr/ would do it. But as always, bakers serve at the pleasure of anons. Can never really go against the 'will of the board'. Can defy BO but not board consensus. If enough anons would fully grasp the motivations that drive oss and allies - well, that would be a turning point. But that's their call now. We cannot do this for them.
Anons were never the enemy. But they are not children either - must gain greater situational awareness if they do not like the situation there. Must "learn to bake" - and not just in the literal sense. Need to understand how a functional board works and what is currently being done to undermine it.
Second post you capped is mine -
why posted?
>Mongolia
can ya still baker from there?
;-}
Gonna skeedadle
Good discussion, more later.
OUT