>>2285

Notice how the CCP is overboard with the Hunter porn pushes while this stuff, the real news, is dropping?

>>2303

>>2321

Welp; confirmed you cannot trust this "gnews" source in the least. And to my knowledge, Bannon never said that he's working with gnews or gtv (please correct me if I'm wrong). He did invite Hoft (GWP) to be a part of the War Room, though:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/tgps-jim-hoft-joins-bannon-war-room-discuss-huge-breaking-story-rocked-biden-family-come-tomorrow/

We were originally provided the link to these outlets by GWP. Who, BTW, were getting lots of help from a Cassandra Fairbanks. You anons know who she is, right? Anywho, the "Coons' daughter getting railed by Hunter" narrative fell apart because coomers ID'd the video on xvideos, and the other screenshots of the footjob that was labeled Mulan actress was actually (very obviously) with a black female.

Anyway, stuff's already getting debunked left and right. QRB link:

>>>/qresearch/11307058

The stories from gnews and gtv just aren't trustworthy at this point. Some of it might be true, but it's looking like some of it isn't, also, which spells problems for credibility. The real story is what Bannon is dropping. This porn shit is starting to really look like a bunch of noise to distract from the Bannon material.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/go-chinas-gtv-releases-videos-hunter-biden-sex-tapes-smoking-crack/

Again, the media itself; the pics, the vids, etc., all appear valid. But the stories on the gtv/gnews sites are really wonky. I'd keep focused on Bannon, and I'd even suggest keeping some of GWP's stuff at arms length. Trust but verify is what I'm getting at.

>>2317

>The 14 year old (at the time) has also been confirmed by Lude (on that site and through leaked text messages) as being Haylie

Whoa; wait. Beau and Hallie (the mother) had two kids together. Do you know what their names are? Link to where Lude said daughter "Haylie". That will just add more credence to the argument that this stuff isn't very trustworthy.

>>2334

Sorry so long, just trying to be thorough as we wade through all this stuff.

The Gnews stories surrounding the currently released vids/pics are being proven false. They say it was Mulan in one of the footjob vids, and it wasn't (unless she turned African descent since her movie). They say he was banging Malia, and used a dated pic of Malia's credit card that was from another drop long time ago and completely unassociated with this drop. Too many holes in their stories, no real evidence to back it.

I'm not saying that Hunter didn't do stuff with underage girls. I am affirming that has not been proven at all between the stories they are writing, or the pics/vids released to date that are featuring obviously very experienced and very expensive call girls.

>Just watched Chanel vid

It's good that people are doing the right thing and contacting the authorities to get them involved after seeing what's on that laptop. But after listening to Chanel's interview, it's still a narrative. Hunter was "being sexual" around her (vague?), Hunter and Natalie were facetiming back and forth, but nothing inappropriate or sexual is mentioned specifically about that. In one picture, Natalie was "horizontal" with Hunter (like, what, laying next to each other in the bed or on a couch? Fully clothed?). Hunter wasn't wearing a shirt around her at some point (I'm presuming they weren't at the swimming pool?). She doesn't say they had intercourse, or Natalie gave him a footjob, or gave each other oral sex, or traded nudes, or filmed themselves having intercourse or otherwise.

Also the pictures that are concerning? I think it's likely that Natalie took pictures of herself and sent them to Hunter (clothed). I think it's definitely possible that Hunter may have even took some pictures of Natalie himself, possibly (again, clothed), but if they've seen "everything on the hard drive", and the best she has is "Well, there's lots of suggestive shit on here", then there's no proof. Again, a narrative. Sure you can "paint a picture from all that", but notice the words they are using, and being very careful not to directly accuse Hunter of engaging in sexual activity with Natalie. It's because of everything on the laptop, there is zero evidence of it. Lots of "not so normal stuff" or "borderline stuff", but nothing that proves it outright.

Having said all that, It is very obvious that the family has problems. Look at the national review's release of Ashley (Joe Biden's Daughter) Biden's journals:

https://nationalfile.com/full-release-ashley-biden-diary-reveals-child-sex-trauma-drug-abuse-resentment-for-joe-whistleblower/

Yeah, that's fucked up. She describes masturbating to her parents' love making as a child, and inappropriate showers with Joe. That's solid accusations, and evidence of sheer perversion. It's likely she was not the only one abused in this family; very likely.

Hunter's got tons of problems. Drugs, hookers, international crime sprees/money laundering, etc. But in the end, there is ZERO solid evidence of CP on the laptop. Compare that to the Weiner laptop where it was confirmed by multiple sources that not only was there some dick pics from Weiner, but evidence of "crimes against children" as well.

>>2346

This is what I'm seeing, and I'm very open to being corrected on this.

The verifiable stuff:

1. The Hunter laptop, somehow, came into possession of all the right folks.

2. Bannon and Giuliani scraped through it, but also knew when the @FBI had it (important).

3. The FBI hasn't done shit.

4. Bannon and Co. are coordinating a release of all the contents of it right before election day (for BOOMs) with this "gnews" "gtv" crew.

5. The media (pictures, videos, emails, audio recordings) and generally everything else on the laptop is 100% verifiable and real.

6. The drops that Bannon, specifically, is discussing, is the real news.

The "iffy but interesting" stuff:

1. Chanel is sewing seeds of possible abuse of children (specifically Natalie Biden) from the content she's seen (perhaps to be validated in later releases/court proceeding results?).

2. OAN is sort of running with it.

The "proven false" stuff:

1. Shills on 4chan/qresearch are absolutely hammering thread after thread with disinfo and unverifiable nonsense and narratives. It's a tainted well type of scenario where they are trying to make anons look like idiots.

2. This Chinese news outlet is publishing stories that aren't lining up specifically with the videos/pictures at all (the sex stuff), and have been proven outright false in some cases.

3. The GWP sort of took a hit to their credibility by referring everyone to this Chinese news outlet because of the narratives these folks are writing to go with the salacious media (the stories are wrong).

My approach is:

1. Trust what Bannon is reporting on because that's the meat.

2. The stuff GWP is reporting on I'm using a "trust but verify" approach.

3. The news stories directly from gnews/gtv I'm not even paying attention to. Just the hard evidence (audio/emails/vids/pics).