TYB
Q: Is there a cavalry in Space??
Since FJ was gonna post that dumb trololo vid, the least we could do is trololo it.
Looks like Japan slipped off the /qr/ catalog - one week wo/posting and you're toast. But there's a China thread, spacing is prolly off (Chrome never lines up):
China #1 >>>/qresearch/11250635 #1 – >>
>Japan
Probably just didn't have enough support. Side boards go to /qr/ to die, unless they have watchers to bump 'em initially.
unlikey bo/bv's are gonna bump posts. would be nice if FJ restored catalog to original condition, so stuff wouldn't disappear so fast, but doubtful that'll happen.
if you do restore, mebbe create a post warning anons on that thread that the catalog goes fast - so they need to bump stuff regularly.
also the PEN pics.
"danger, danger will robinson"
not sure whether this interview's been posted (Gen Flynn with Newsmax) but posted as an mp4 bc the OP was suspended from twatter - over this vid?
Alex Salvi @alexsalvinews
Pres. Trump reportedly asked Michael Flynn about imposing martial law—an idea he floated on Newsmax earlier in the week (below)—during a meeting at the White House on Friday. (@NYT)
Aides in the room forcefully pushed back against such a suggestion.
https://twitter.com/alexsalvinews/status/1340494794389274624
Lin Wood @LLinWood
Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pennsylvania are states in which martial law should be imposed & machines/ballots seized.
7 states under martial law.
43 states not under martial law.
I like those numbers.
Do it @realDonaldTrump!
Nation supports you.
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1340482330893365256
Ron @CodeMonkeyZ
SPECIAL PROSECUTOR ranking by Twitter vote:
Sidney Powell - 95% yes
Rudy Giulianni - 88% yes
Lin Wood - 85% yes
Ken Star - 68% yes
Trey Gowdy - 58% yes
90% support a limited martial law.
—tentative results—
—final results tomorrow—
6:56 PM · Dec 19, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1340491146791776257
Who says qr has nothing to offer?
<<<Nikked this - kekking
ahma still around - in and out, for awhile
POTUS ain't backin' off, neither are we.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
GREATEST ELECTION FRAUD IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY!!!
posted 9:26 pst
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1340529063799246848
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Why isn’t Congress giving our people a Stimulus Bill? It wasn’t their fault, it was the fault of China. GET IT DONE, and give them more money in direct payments.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1340527057151930369
took me two passes, kek
tx - so yer signing out now. I gotta go as well, eyez need rest.
o7
This is a coupla days old but somehow not in qresear.ch.
WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’
December 17, 2020
In a statement released on December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally owned up to what 100,000’s of doctors and medical professionals have been saying for months: the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 is a hit and miss process with way too many false positives.
This WHO-admitted “Problem” comes in the wake of international lawsuits exposing the incompetence and malfeasance of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not fit for purpose.
This World Health Organization admission is that the crux of the “problem” is a wholly arbitrary cycling process which “means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.” [emphasis added]
The UN body is now clearly looking to distance itself from the fatally flawed test as a growing number of lawsuits are processing through the courts exposing the insanity of relying on a test that even the inventor, Professor Kary B. Mullis said was never designed to diagnose diseases. [1]
https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/
>WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’
when posting this on qr, added the following:
SO:
the consensus - even among the DS - seems to be that we are now shutting down the ENTIRE PLANET to treat a malady that
uses a test which is completely unreliable
can be easily and effectively treated by HCQ and Ivermectin (see Oct stmt by the AMA, which reversed their anti-treatment stance)
has a 99%+ survival rate.
what's wrong with this picture???
looks good in Chrome - works well for other browsers, i hope?
Synopsis:
Rogue baker OSS attacked the kitchen in the spring, retreated but returned in the summer and convinced anons that the entire kitch was comp'd using constant repetion and fake data. Got FJ on his side so usual bakers' breads were beat out by OSS/allies breads over and over. In Oct, this thread was formed by bakers to provide a place for bakers/anons to post that preserved the traditional approach of /qresearch/.
>>12102566
Captured on twatter: Robt Kennedy's discussion of potentially dire effects from Covid19 vaxxes, due to Pathogenic Priming - where the vaccine appears to have triggered a robust immune response after administered but when the person encounters the actual virus in real life, he (for unknown reasons) is very badly affected (much worse than unvaxxed people).
https://twitter.com/lyne_ian/status/1335197467143356416
Here's the article that says the same thing K says on whatever program he's on (sorry, twitter poster did not sauce the program):
Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults
By James Lyons-Weiler, PhD & Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
In the development of vaccines against coronaviruses like SARS-COV-1 and MERS in the early 2000’s, researchers found evidence of a serious problem. Teams of U.S. and foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs.
This issue is well known. Early in the COVID-19 scenario, Dr. Peter Hotez, of Baylor College of Medicine, testified before Congress about the dangers of accelerating coronavirus vaccine development, saying “(The) unique safety problem of coronavirus vaccines” was discovered 50 years ago while developing the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine.”
He went to register that this “‘paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon’ means vaccinated people may still develop the disease, get sicker and die.”….
Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1950s. The vaccines not only failed to prevent infection; 80% of the children infected required hospitalization, and two children challenged with the RSV died (see Openshaw, 2005). In April of 2020, Hotez told CNN, “If there is immune enhancement in animals, that’s a showstopper.”
["Enhanced immune response" = "pathogenic priming"]
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/
Yes, it was the 'usual shit'. but this time, it hit the fan. Turns out that constant repetition of a Big Lie works not only on the mainstream but also on anons.
BTW, welcome back.
o7
nicely done!
if yer not stickin around, hope doc is an early riser. i gotta go to bed. but i imagine we got enough bakers around here that somebody will bake.
btw, breads on this board go to 200. Shills don't hang out here much so breds fill up with notes by then. It's a little light tonite coz Sat night.
gy shift fading
G'nite all.
-OUT
din know gretchen was alive then…..
Why I will not give up
by Newt Gingrich
A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden’s victory.
The friend made the case that Biden had gotten more votes, and historically we recognize the person with the most votes. Normally, we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events.
So, my friend asked why was 2020 different?
Having spent more than four years watching the left #Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on undoing and undermining the 2016 election, it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings.
As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes. My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election was over grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs.
The challenge is that I – and other conservatives – are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world. We live in alternative worlds.
The left’s world is mostly the established world of the forces who have been dominant for most of my life.
My world is the populist rebellion which believes we are being destroyed, our liberties are being cancelled, and our religions are under assault. (Note the new Human Rights Campaign to decertify any religious school which does not accept secular sexual values – and that many Democrat governors have kept casinos open while closing churches though the COVID-19 pandemic.) We also believe other Democrat-led COVID-19 policies have enriched the wealthy while crushing middle class small business owners (some 160,000 restaurants may close)….
https://www.gingrich360.com/2020/12/why-i-will-not-give-up/
Rep. Matt Gaetz Says He Will Challenge Electoral College Votes on Jan. 6
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said on Saturday that he plans to challenge electoral college votes when they are counted during a Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 6.
“So on January 6, I’m joining with the fighters in the Congress and we are going to object to electors from states that didn’t run clean elections,” Gaetz told a crowd during the first day of the Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit.
Republicans in Congress are considering whether to join the effort to challenge the 2020 general election results. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) initiated the push when he announced his intention to object to the electoral college votes come January, while several other Republican lawmakers from both chambers have remained open to participating in the effort.
Objections during the joint session must be made in writing by at least one House member and senator. If the objection meets requirements, the joint session pauses and each house withdraws to their own chamber to debate the question for a maximum of two hours. The House and Senate will then vote separately to accept or reject the objection, which requires a majority vote from both chambers.
If one chamber accepts and the other rejects, then according to federal law the “the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted.”
Several Republican senators have not ruled out the possibility of objection but have said that they would first monitor the developments regarding claims of voter fraud. Meanwhile, newly elected Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) has previously suggested that he may join the planned objection by members of the House of Representatives.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/rep-matt-gaetz-says-he-will-challenge-electoral-college-votes-on-jan-6_3625817.html/