FYI

Who voted no - complete lists

sauce

https://twitter.com/Yoder_Esqq/status/1341353462731255812

More info/succinct comments on the stimulus bill here:

https://twitter.com/Yoder_Esqq

(Attorney, @DhillonLaw, #Constitutional litigation, Political Consultant, #GOP & #Trump2020 Legal Advisory Board, @Article3Project)

President Trump signs the stimulus and the MSM highlights the foreign aid and ridiculous waste.

President Trump vetos the bill and the MSM blames Trump for blocking aid to Americans.

Either way, it's clear both parties have turned their back on @realDonaldTrump

• • • • -

NUKE THE SWAMP

>>27821

That's beautiful.

Corporate swamp and their PR dingbats won't come close to that.

Anon was thinking about the United States of America as a beacon of liberty for the world. And thinking about the storm.

>>27860

This post desperately needs sauce.

Not notableunless posed as a question needing digging, or unless someone comes up with documentation for the claims.

>>27860

>>27915

>sauce

The cap in the post includes

https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-democrats-file-omnibus-spending-bill

but it does nothing to support the assertions.

I looked at a lot which could fuel pages of argument, opinion and discussion. Don't want to encourage just that.

The most readworthy pages (about 20) I found:

https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3357&context=lcp

IMO, the tweet was good in that it, at the least, provides hope and points to something worth learning about, but the tweeter's research is unimpressive. He could at least have mentioned how funding for the Congressionally opposed wall came about.

Fortunately our President is not as lazy as some tweeters and posters; I'm confident he's on top of this in many ways (managing the money AND educating the public).

So I looked stuff up, yes.

>>27924

>"The state legislatures, they can look at all of this corruption, they can look at how their laws and their states were totally ignored, and they can take back their delegates at any time," said Ellis. "And they can refuse to go along with the certifications that are absolutely false and fraudulent. So that's the constitutional solution."

Right. So what progress with that?

>>27927

I don't see your point.

>>27931

>research omnibus bills/spending

. . . I did.

>let us know what you find

. . . I did, in the post nyou are replying to.

If you and others are saying that an omnibus bill (which is essentially a bunch of appropriations bills thrown together) by definition affords the President freedom to spend any of the money however he wants, that's untrue.

Regarding Presidential discretion, do you (anyone) see a difference between an appropriations bill and an omnibus bill? - something special because omnibus?

>the bill passed was an omnibus, as stated