Anonymous ID: 59626e Oct. 28, 2020, 8:57 p.m. No.3260   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3263 >>3264 >>3268 >>3288 >>3358

>>3258

 

Here's what probably happened:

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/10/28/tucker-carlson-bobulinski-documents-intercepted-and-removed-from-overnight-package/

 

I'd write a longer post, but can't compete with one-word and one sentence posts fired off.

 

.

Anonymous ID: 59626e Oct. 28, 2020, 9:55 p.m. No.3292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3294 >>3310

>>3273

>might be historic.

 

Sounds like it needs a special separate thread. Could cover the blow by blow there, with only occasional summaries here :)

 

… like 2 per bun, instead of 25 or 50 :))

Anonymous ID: 59626e Oct. 28, 2020, 10:11 p.m. No.3296   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3298 >>3301

>>3271

>POTUS Schedule for THURSDAY, October 29, 2020

 

Anon is continually impressed by not only superPOTUS's energy, but by the logistics behind all such activity.

 

Just awesome.

Anonymous ID: 59626e Oct. 28, 2020, 10:18 p.m. No.3299   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3310

>>3294

>It’s our aim here to stay out of the drama and have somewhere for us all to be able to get away from it.

 

Is that intended for me and my posts? It would seem so, since you are replying to my post.

 

Just checking, because I'm a bit confused.

Anonymous ID: 59626e Oct. 28, 2020, 11:52 p.m. No.3364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3372

>>3356

 

Not surw what "tweet" you are referring to.

 

If you mean taht Tucker didn't send the reply to roger, I think that's incorrect. Scroll uppage to the first posting of the messages ( in No. 3312) and you can see at the top of them Tucker's ID. It is in fact Tucker replying to Roger.