Anonymous ID: df7697 Jan. 15, 2021, 1:59 a.m. No.42702   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2703

Since there is going to be a datadump, a reminder about the Russian Collusion narrative. I snagged it in Dec. 2018 but think it was floating around before then. If the author (don't think he was ever figgured out) is even close, it was all about hiding election fraudโ€ฆ.. "Hillary's Election Trap".

Anonymous ID: df7697 Jan. 15, 2021, 3:08 a.m. No.42711   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2715

>>42706 Goood Morning, Morning. Took this quiet time to 'clean up' some files and move a bunch off line. "One never knows, do one?" Think there's a collective 'hold your breath' going on r/n but once the screaming starts, it's gonna get real loud, real fast.

Anonymous ID: df7697 Jan. 15, 2021, 6:17 a.m. No.42767   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2768 >>2770 >>2783 >>2796 >>2841 >>2847

The press and pundits seem to be concentrating on declass of hussein-o-gate. Saw whispers yesterday that Ukraine documents will also be declassified. Found this little jewel among the files. That guy whose name caused insta-banish across many platforms. Ciaramella. If Ukraine docs are opened and this guy's name shows up moar than one time, ain't none of us gonna need propane - at least for a while.

Anonymous ID: df7697 Jan. 15, 2021, 7:41 a.m. No.42791   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2796 >>2809 >>2841 >>2847

There is nothing suspicious at all about the timing of this report.

 

Covid-19 infections offer as much protection against reinfection as vaccines, UK study shows

 

Public Health England regularly tested two matched groups of volunteers between June and November โ€” 6,000 health workers who had previously been infected with coronavirus and 14,000 who had not.

 

A comparison of infections in the two groups, described in preliminary results released on Thursday, found that prior infection provided at least 83 per cent protection against reinfection. It gave better than 94 per cent protection against symptomatic Covid-19, matching the figures for the most effective Covid-19 vaccines.

 

https://cuencahighlife.com/covid-19-infections-offer-as-much-protection-against-reinfection-as-vaccines-uk-study-shows/

Anonymous ID: df7697 Jan. 15, 2021, 8:15 a.m. No.42809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2841 >>2847

>>42791 Moar information. Freakin' amazing. The study was a SIREN study. Guess who funds SIREN Studies and if you said NIH, you win a prize. So one part of NIH says 'you all gonna die' and another part of NIH says Hey, here's some money to figgur out if yo really gonna die. SMDH.

 

From the DM: People previously infected with the coronavirus have more protection against reinfection five months later than people getting the Oxford vaccine, and the same level of immunity that is provided by the Pfizer jab, a Public Health England (PHE) study has found.

Data from PHE's SIREN study, which follows more than 20,000 healthcare workers at more than 100 sites across Britain, looked at how many members of NHS staff in the study group caught the virus more than once.

A total of 6,614 workers were found to have had the virus in early 2020, either through antibody testing, PCR swabs or clinical evaluation based on symptoms.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9142659/Previous-coronavirus-infection-gives-protection-against-reinfection-Oxford-vaccine.html

dailymail archived: https://archive.vn/7mEA1

https://siren.network/about-siren