Originally General Research #15994 >>12527556

Jade Sacker CNN in Capitol building during invasion was CNN in on the Capitol Building invasion?

CNN’s Jade Sacker penetrating the Capitol with a member of BLM/Antifa cheering, “We did it!” And then asking her conspirator if he was filming, he said he’d delete it, he lied. CNN was in on it.

Jade Sacker, a photojournalist who followed him into the Capitol to film his exploits as part of a documentary project. Here she's heard congratulating him - "We did it!" - and he says, "Is this not gonna be the best film you've ever made in yr life?" - Blumenthal

Wow! CNN photojournalist Jade Sacker was in the Capitol with BLM activist Sullivan & she heard celebrating with him saying “we did it!”

Did CNN collude in the Capitol Riot?

• Melissa Tate

https://youtu.be/n2xCwQ2CKgM

>>42668

So to combat these high tech weapons the lower tech flak guns come back. Fill their swarming asses with shrapnel as it were

>>42674

Why not? By end of WW2 the shells had radio transmitters inside them. The signal bounced of the plane and when the return was strong enough the thing went off. Now imagine electronics in those of 2020 instead of 1944

>>42686

I looked at the first article and Merkel is in until the end of of this year.

Netherlands are considering resigning, career politicians with no consulting/lobbying job to go to don't just resign.

What's with the muh joo thing?

>>42689

Roger that!

Rack Ops for me too

>>42690

Did you grab the stuff from General Research?

>>42693

I always go to put in the post if it is just me bringing something over. The "Originally General Research #XXXX >>YYYYYYY" or UK, or whatever. Gives credit to the original anon in a small way and if anything screwy keeps me from getting flame sprayed by angry anons

This time I really am going to snooze before the cat steals my pillow again