Anonymous ID: 58ffa0 Feb. 1, 2021, 12:30 p.m. No.51613   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1615

>>51588

went over to /qr/ to digg on suspicious-looking twat

coz baker din give NO SAUCE

found the r-u-ready-to-die shill post but (unfortunately) no HRC, ha-ha

<<<also found this funny meme

ENJOY

Anonymous ID: 58ffa0 Feb. 1, 2021, 12:36 p.m. No.51614   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>51603

>Council on Foreign Relations calls for formation of state-owned media to quell subversive internet chatter

You mean like правда???

 

>public-service news

>neutral news

sounds SWELL.

 

>supported by Ben Sasse

great endorsement, too.

Anonymous ID: 58ffa0 Feb. 1, 2021, 12:50 p.m. No.51621   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1629 >>1664 >>1738 >>1750 >>1755

FAUCI FLIPS AGAIN! Now Says That There’s “No Data” To Support Double Masking

 

Just when the push to bully Americans into wearing two masks was picking up steam, Dr. Anthony Fauci has once again reversed course on advice that he had given only days ago.

 

Last week, Fauci put his stamp of approval on the double masking during a chat with Savannah Guthrie on NBC’s “TODAY” show.

 

According to Fauci: “So if you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on, it just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective”

 

Then over the weekend when Joe Biden’s top medical adviser was able to squeeze in yet another media interview into his busy schedule, Fauci flip-flopped – AGAIN.

 

Dr. Fauci now says:

 

“There are many people who feel, you know if you just wanna have a little extra bit of protection, maybe I should put two masks on.

 

There’s nothing wrong with that but there’s no data that indicates that that is going to make a difference and that’s the reason why the CDC has not changed the recommendations.”

 

The double masking was quickly embraced by virtue-signaling Democrats….

 

https://thetruedefender.com/fauci-flips-again-now-says-that-theres-no-data-to-support-double-masking/

 

https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

 

https://twitter.com/CortesSteve/status/1356009181648711685

[article embed]

Anonymous ID: 58ffa0 Feb. 1, 2021, 1:10 p.m. No.51632   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1634 >>1664 >>1738 >>1750 >>1754

>>51579

>>51624

should clarify - feel like it's white hats that are responsible for so many troops in DC, for ongoing ops involving troops.

Even found some sauce to support this idea.

 

Mayor is not a fan of extra troops:

''Bowser: 'We will not accept extra troops or permanent fencing as a long-term fixture in DC'''

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dc-mayor-bowser-rejects-permanent-capitol-fencing

 

NEVERTHELESS:

 

The National Guard will remain in Washington, D.C., through the end of March over concerns of potential civil unrest, a spokesman confirmed for Fox News Tuesday.

 

"As we continue to work to meet the final post-inauguration requirements, the National Guard has been requested to continue supporting federal law enforcement agencies with 7,000 members and will draw down to 5,000 through mid-March," National Guard Bureau spokesman Wayne Hall told Fox News. "We are providing assistance such as security, communications, medical evacuation, logistics, and safety support to state, district and federal agencies."

 

Acting Army Secretary John E. Whitley told reporters during a Monday press conference that the guardsmen will provide support to federal law enforcement agencies after four requests were submitted for additional aid from U.S. Park Police, U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dc-national-guard-deployment-extended-through-march

 

So who is actually ordering the troops to DC at this point?