>>56285 Tanks NB and Hiya.
B.o.B. (Bokey on board)
>>56301 This is a great suggestion - especially if the date of the quote is included to give it credibility. Also give the moar curious a place to start their own research. Adding a date / venue(?) might also make it less likely to fall into the 'disinformation' category since it can be confirmed.
Wut about a 'series' that shows what PDJT actually said vs. how it was reported? I keep going back to the 'compromised reporters' Q post. One way of cracking the bubble is to shine light on the 'people you were taught to trust' like reporters vs. the object of their scorn (us and PDJT).
>>56311 Hi ol' fren. Shoot. I came as I were.
>>56368 KEK! That'z about it, too.
I have a trooth account and interested parties across the pond. The 'board' thing is too much visual confusion (dyslexic) so send them to resear.ch for the highlights.
>>56387 Tru dat. I'm really amazed at how much they are depending on the US and us to pull out of this nose dive. Inspirational.