hey doc
just got back
took muh car w/snow tires, studs and 4 wheel drive for a spin (after appt) and it works great in heavy slush, much better than previous car wo/4 wheel. ice would be harder but slush is great, really fun. helped tamp down the slush in muh neighborhood espec on hills.
than came home, dunked real think slices of boston brown bread in egg and threw it in a hot pan of coconut oil - plus already cooked BACON as a side.
Heaven.
>new intel tool
https://datorss.com/
visiting the main site left me puzzled - so lean and mean i didn't know what it was.
Open source search engine sounds interesting but still for nerds, as far as I can tell.
here's more:
https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/lkfhfj/datorss_the_best_rss_search_experience_you_can/
much more control with 4wd
i always had studded tires but not the combo
last time i had a 4wd vehicle, it was a 69 truck
4wd wasn't exactly convenient but did get me outta a flash flood once
(really fun trying to finagle the 4wd as the water's risin)
last 3 days physically exhausting
went to chiro & everything hurt , was moaning & groaning at first - better now
nappening time
might intro new hat line later, we'll see
sorry so long but it's not an easy q.
Here's my general approach.
When i notable something from a twitter acct, there's two different reasons:
the message is relevant & quality sauce is provided (e.g., somebody i've never heard of links to a trusted source, e.g. America's Frontline Doctors)
the source itself is of interest (or also of interest) because of their special insider status: PDJT, Scavino, Don Jr, John Solomon, etc.
In the first case, vetting the source doesn't really matter (focus is on vetting the info itself)
In the second case, it does (because the
source is presumed to be using subtle comms)
*
Ideas how to vet in the second case:
see if other trusted sources cite them.
see if the same message is put out by other trusted sources.
use my gut (but very conservatively)
If not still not sure, what to do? Possibilities:
do not notable (wait for more info if it's an early report on something)
use but use a question mark about the message (w/Scavino pics, won't work)
say "acct not fully verified") or "Scavino (?)"
My tendency is usually - 'do not use.
Credibility matters.
We might have a hunch about something, but it's not newsworthy unless there's the kind of sauce that's really solid, imo.
If there's an 'insider' message, it's up to anons to stay alert for that kind of thing. A lot of times, it's gets around thru the anon grapevine.
If something like a Scavino pic is a message to 'insiders' or Q posts wo/tripcode (etc), we don't need to broadcast to the world anyway
(BTW, not implying that Scavino pics are not from Scavino, just using him as an example of someone where the messenger's identity is a kind of sauce)
Don Jr reporting from the Trump Car Parade on Prez Day!
https://t.me/TrumpJr/8768
can't show the whole thing, too big.
2 clips:
procession in front of MarALago
PDJT driving thru a wildly cheering crowd
this is not the look of a guy who lost an election.
https://youtu.be/zFoL4SjbSG4
based on >>>/qresearch/12942868
no notes collected for 3 breads - going on 4
let's get em out anyway.
Trump Attorney Michael Van Der Veen Says He Sent His Children to Secretive Location, Has Hired Armed Guards at Home and Work due to Threats
Attorney Michael van der Veen joined Rob Schmitt on Newsmax TV on Monday night following his big victory Saturday defending the President of the United States.
Schmitt asked Van der Veen about reports that his home was attacked.
[in reference to driveway being spray-painted "TRAITOR:]:
Michael Van Der Veen:
We had a lot more than that happen to our home. We’re doing fine. I moved my children to a secretive location. We’ve hired armed guards to protect our places of living and working. And we’re doing fine. My family understands and my law firm understands that we fight on the side of right.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/trump-attorney-michael-van-der-veen-says-sent-children-secretive-location-hired-armed-guards-home-work-due-threats-video/
Things not going well next door. It's bad, even for them. Trying to rouse anons to collect notes, and to throw the damn shills outta there. Q deserves better. Hardly any news this bread. Just shills & shitposters. Damn shame.
compare and contrast.
KEK.
~~775,000~~ 1.14 Million Watch Trump Parade on President’s Day – ~~38,000~~ 76,000 Watch Dementia Joe Biden’s Speech on President’s Day
Trump supporters held a huge President’s Day celebration in West Palm Beach, Florida today for President Trump.
There were no celebrations planned for Joe Biden today but we’re expected to believe Dementia Joe got 81 million votes!
President Trump surprised the Florida rally-goers on Monday and the crowd went wild!
Over half a million Trump supporters viewed the Pro-Trump celebration in West Palm Beach, Florida on President’s Day.
now up to 1.14 million views for impromptu Trump celebration.
Biden has ~~1,200~~ 1,800 upvotes and ~~5,700~~ 15,000 down votes on his speech on YouTube.
There’s no way this guy won in November. You all know it. They know it.
https://world365.info/775000-watch-trump-parade-on-presidents-day-38000-watch-dementia-joe-bidens-speech-on-presidents-day/
Ok here's the link to Joe's speech. Wasn't gonna embed it, it's awful. Less than 2 minutes long and even watching that much is painful.
But i relented - really gotta see it to believe it. Ck out the lighting, the music, the message. FUNEREAL ("befitting or suggesting a funeral").
https://youtu.be/mv6Ne0zkbr0
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/103309429/
you can still read the comments there.
the ultimate genesis is probably not /pol/
>ready to roll i suppose
ha-ha-ha
and i'm ready to rest, i suppose.
things are pretty quiet at night right now, so i just gather what i can and tend the dough.
really enjoyed comparing biden prez day "speech" with trump crowd cheering PDJT on.
handoff confirmed?
let's see what post-peachmint times are like.