Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 5:37 a.m. No.59340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9342 >>9351

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/12978566.html#12979543

 

Lots of fear mongering going on in that thread. 8-bit, FJ, and others are making it seem like Jim's going to hand over everyone's IP over to FEMA for gulag. In reality, it looks like MNR was "Righting the ship" as requested by Q, and Site admins/global vols were slowly clamping down on the chaos over at /qresearch/.

 

Is that about right?

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 5:42 a.m. No.59343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9345 >>9350 >>9353

>>59342

Why would someone that is sitting at the helm of the most popular research board in probably the history of the internet allow it to get as bad as it did? I mean, I know I took a break from posting here while /qresearch/ appeared to limp along, but the appearance of it limping along was also like watching the curtains slowly close. Not on the movement, per se, but on that particular board.

 

Now I don't feel so stupid for jumping over here when I did before.

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 6:04 a.m. No.59357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9360

>>59345

>can only hope it stays the way it is.

Well, the way they are talking (lots of schizo going on over there) Jim basically endorsed this board a while back. That seems fair, and a good choice, but those guys seem very dejected over letting QR get to the point that it did. All they had to do was right the ship. So many people were getting frustrated for so long with how it was being run, you'd think they'd at least put forth a little bit more effort to keep the thing from tanking so hard.

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 7:28 a.m. No.59391   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9393 >>9489

https://twitter.com/nickbackovic/status/1362328580332670976

 

@nickbackovic

Total despair on the QResearch board on 8kun. Volunteers are apparently unhappy with the way Jim Watkins is running things since Ron quit. "Ron, you're still cool," this one says, "but god damn I don't like your dad."

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 7:30 a.m. No.59393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>59391

Look at the narrative being painted:

 

https://twitter.com/MarthaM00086745/status/1362407214657462276

 

https://twitter.com/nickbackovic/status/1362408772224897026

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 8:54 a.m. No.59434   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9444

A great thread. The Antarctica Cruise Ship as an armchair analysts' case study.

 

https://twitter.com/VincentRK/status/1275838416236580867

@VincentRK

Important insights from the Antarctica cruise ship story. @ThoraxBMJ

. #COVID

 

217 on cruise

All asymptomatic before cruise, & for first 7 days

 

128 developed COVID (59%) despite precautions after 1 case

 

81% asymptomatic

19% symptomatic

3.1% Intubated

1 death (0.8%)

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 9:14 a.m. No.59450   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>59444

Here's a source doc from the thread. They mention the PCR test, but not frequency specifically. It would appear as though they did multiple tests throughout the incident.

https://thorax.bmj.com/content/75/8/693

Anonymous ID: 6e087e Feb. 18, 2021, 10:01 a.m. No.59479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9486

>>59473

>>59474

Be honest, I had to hang around qr just to see how it'd eventually end up, though I did post here way back near the first few breads to just stop in and say "Hi". Just thankful there's still a home for anons still focusing on the reason behind the movement.