>>60602

Interesting read. Seems like a possible scenario to keep anons informed, while editing in some "We don't really know which way it'll go" potential disinfo just to keep the DS's hair on fire, or possibly make more mistakes along the way.

>>60632

Do you happen to have a direct link to that post? Impressive ID and post, you have to admit.

>>60817

>>60817

>>60839

In all seriousness, it would be nice to get dialogue going to hash things out. Let's see where it goes from here.