>>64002 Thanks for posting this. Read the entire thing and changed my mind re: reason for Robert's blackmail. The author cites articles as far back as 2005 regarding the children being Irish, adopted from Latin America, etc. However after reading this refresher, it seems odd that he could continue to be 'blackmailed' by information that has long been in the public domain. For approx. sixteen years this info has been published at various times. Since obomb-a-care, it has been touted by all and sundry as the 'reason Roberts has been blackmailed'. Nice cover story - he's human, he just wanted children, is it really so bad?, etc. and there really hasn't been any blowback about it. Most recently, Roberts sided w/the liberal wing of SCOTUS re: hearing the Pennsylvania mail in ballots question. There's gotta be something worse than 'he adopted Irish children' hanging over his head. What is the 'something worse'?
>>64006 Think I'll poke around at possible associates - starting with Roberts' CV as submitted at his circuit court nomination hearing in 2003. His CV begins on page 305 of the 734 page document. (not all Roberts - includes other federal appointments) Roberts' work history begins on page 306.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108shrg89324/pdf/CHRG-108shrg89324.pdf
>>64012 Nope - all Yours!